Radiographic Assessment Of The Accuracy Of 3D Ridge Augmentation In Anterior Mandible Using Computer Guided Autogenous Cortical Shell Technique Versus Free Hand Technique

NCT ID: NCT06691516

Last Updated: 2024-11-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-21

Study Completion Date

2026-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

\* this study aims to evaluate accuracy of fixation of the bone shells by a calculated distance which is always a challenging step for inexperienced surgeons to fix a cortical shells at the ideal position in the conventional protocol.

the fixation guides used to make the shells precisely fixed at the proper position and angulation the problem is if it fixed with insufficient distance with proposed volume loss leads to totally insufficient volume gain for future implant placement

* also to evaluate the efficacy of the CAD/CAM surgical guide during chin harvesting (harvesting guide ) procedure in reducing the risk of anatomical structure damage (mental neve) and patient morbidity with more accuracy compared with the standard technique and preserve the roots of the lower anterior teeth or any fracture to the inferior border of the mandible also allow to harvest the bone shells from the suitable area with cancellous bone which prevent bad split of the bone shells this trial versus free hand conventional cortical shell bone technique both harvested from symphysis area (chin),
* also to evaluate thickness of implanted bone shells , the thickness should be enough to preserve the graft(autograft 50% and xenograft 50%) between the buccal and lingual bone shells
* also aims to evaluate the vertical and horizontal bone augmentation achieved at the anterior mandible using computer-guided cortical shell bone technique.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

this study aims to evaluate accuracy of fixation of the bone shells by a calculated distance which is always a challenging step for inexperienced surgeons to fix a cortical shells at the ideal position in the conventional protocol.

the fixation guides used to make the shells precisely fixed at the proper position and angulation the problem is if it fixed with insufficient distance with proposed volume loss leads to totally insufficient volume gain for future implant placement

* also to evaluate the efficacy of the CAD/CAM surgical guide during chin harvesting (harvesting guide ) procedure in reducing the risk of anatomical structure damage (mental neve) and patient morbidity with more accuracy compared with the standard technique and preserve the roots of the lower anterior teeth or any fracture to the inferior border of the mandible also allow to harvest the bone shells from the suitable area with cancellous bone which prevent bad split of the bone shells this trial versus free hand conventional cortical shell bone technique both harvested from symphysis area (chin),
* also to evaluate thickness of implanted bone shells , the thickness should be enough to preserve the graft(autograft 50% and xenograft 50%) between the buccal and lingual bone shells
* also aims to evaluate the vertical and horizontal bone augmentation achieved at the anterior mandible using computer-guided cortical shell bone technique.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

computer guide cortical shell technique in anterior mandible 3d defect

in study group there are bone harvesting guide and two fixation guides

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

horizontal and vertical bone augmentation using computer guided cortical shell technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Computer-guided cortical shell technique in anterior mandible 3d defect using bone harvesting guide and fixation guides

free hand cortical shell technique in anterior 3d defect

in control group, the bone harvesting and shells fixation will done with free hand technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

free hand cortical shell technique in anterior 3d defect

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation in anterior mandible using free hand cortical shell technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

horizontal and vertical bone augmentation using computer guided cortical shell technique

Computer-guided cortical shell technique in anterior mandible 3d defect using bone harvesting guide and fixation guides

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

free hand cortical shell technique in anterior 3d defect

vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation in anterior mandible using free hand cortical shell technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ranges from 20-60 years. No sex predilection.

Patients free from any systemic conditions and bone metabolism diseases that might interfere with the surgical intervention, soft tissue or hard tissue healing.

Edentulous anterior mandible with a horizontally deficient alveolar ridge that is less than 3mm in width and with a vertically defect at least 3mm in height.

The minimum number of missing teeth in the anterior mandible alveolar ridge is two adjacent teeth.

Exclusion Criteria

* Intra-bony lesions (e.g., cysts) or infections (e.g., abscess) that may retard the osteotomy healing.

Previous grafting procedures in the edentulous area
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Salah Sayed Ibrahim Elballal

Dr.Ahmed Salah

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed Salah Ahmed Salah Sayed

Role: CONTACT

+20 010207395

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Computer guided cortical shell

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Autogenous Tooth Graft for Ridge Augmentation
NCT06416605 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA