The Efficiency of Computer Guided Ridge Splitting Using Piezosurgery in Horizontally Deficient Posterior Mandible

NCT ID: NCT03748615

Last Updated: 2018-11-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-20

Study Completion Date

2019-11-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The use of implants has significantly increased prosthetic options for edentulous patient. However, implant placement in the Posterior mandibular region is often hampered significantly by insufficient atrophic width limitations

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Ridge splitting technique causes lateral ridge expansion which creates new implant bed by longitudinal osteotomy, positioning buccal cortex laterally. The buccal cortex is positioned laterally to create space between buccal and lingual cortical plates, which is filled by an endosseous implant with or without any graft material limitations.

Ridge split technique is a very predictable procedure that can achieve substantial gains in horizontal ridge width of the edentulous posterior mandible without associated morbidity. This technique allows the clinician to augment the site and do the implant insertion in a single stage surgery, shortening the healing period drastically.

In the conventional ridge splitting technique, a complete flap is raised to allow adequate visibility of the bone defect which can result in disturbance of vascular supply and increase bone resorption rates. In this case report, a new innovative computer guided closed alveolar ridge splitting flapless technique has been advocated to avoid this disruption.

As Guided implant placement showed a statistically superior accuracy when they are compared with freehand placement after guided osteotomy Computer guided ridge splitting may have a superior accuracy than the freehand ridge splitting and may reduce the time of surgery, healing period and post-operative pain.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Edentulous Patients Atrophic Posterior Mandible With Insufficient Width

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Computer Guided ridge splitting in posterior mandible

fabrication of a computer aided surgical guide and performing ridge splitting in posterior mandible using piezosurgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Computer Guided ridge splitting in posterior mandible

Intervention Type DEVICE

The computer guided ridge splitting for patients with atrophic posterior mandible and with residual bone width at least 3 to 5mm of residual ridge.

The selected patients will be informed of the nature of the research work and informed consent will be signed.

Radiographic examination included preoperative digital panoramic radiograph with 1:1 magnification for each patient as a primary survey to obtain an approximation of the available bone height and detect the presence of remaining roots and localized pathosis.

Computer surgical guides are fabricated for partially edentulous patients using teeth and tissue as support for the guide.

The same surgeon performed all surgeries. All surgical procedures were performed under strict aseptic conditions, all patients received nerve block local anesthesia (Articaine 4% 1:100 000 epinephrine).

A crestal incision is made using No. 15 blade extending over the posterior mandible using computer guided surgical stent.

no flap elevation .

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer Guided ridge splitting in posterior mandible

The computer guided ridge splitting for patients with atrophic posterior mandible and with residual bone width at least 3 to 5mm of residual ridge.

The selected patients will be informed of the nature of the research work and informed consent will be signed.

Radiographic examination included preoperative digital panoramic radiograph with 1:1 magnification for each patient as a primary survey to obtain an approximation of the available bone height and detect the presence of remaining roots and localized pathosis.

Computer surgical guides are fabricated for partially edentulous patients using teeth and tissue as support for the guide.

The same surgeon performed all surgeries. All surgical procedures were performed under strict aseptic conditions, all patients received nerve block local anesthesia (Articaine 4% 1:100 000 epinephrine).

A crestal incision is made using No. 15 blade extending over the posterior mandible using computer guided surgical stent.

no flap elevation .

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with edentulous posterior area of the mandible insufficient width less than 5m, Both sexes.
* No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology
* No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement.

Exclusion Criteria

* Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day.
* Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
* Psychiatric problems.
* Disorders to implant are related to history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site.
* Immunodeficiency pathology, bruxism, stress situation (socially or professionally), emotional instability, and unrealistic aesthetic demands.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

walla farhat mohamed

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

wallaa farahat mohamed, bds

Role: CONTACT

01069543488

mohammed khashaba, phd

Role: CONTACT

01227754765

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CairoUimplant master course

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.