Comparison Between Different Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Techniques

NCT ID: NCT06176417

Last Updated: 2023-12-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-26

Study Completion Date

2023-08-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sixteen patients were selected from the Outpatient Clinic of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University for replacement of missed single tooth / teeth in posterior atrophic mandible by dental implant.

Patients' grouping:

Patients were divided randomly into two equal uniform groups as follow:

Group I:

Eight implants were placed in patients of missing single tooth / teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by decompression technique.

Group II:

Eight implants were placed in patients of missing single tooth / teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by ridge splitting technique using piezosurgery.

All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at regular time interval immediately, 6 and 12 months after surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrophic Ridge

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group 1

Eight implants were placed in patients of missing single tooth / teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by decompression technique.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

horizontal ridge augmentation by decompression technique.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Instead of a cover screw, a 2-mm healing abutment was used after implant insertion

group 2

Eight implants were placed in patients of missing single tooth / teeth in posterior mandible with subsequent horizontal ridge augmentation by ridge splitting technique using piezosurgery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

horizontal ridge augmentation by ridge splitting technique using piezosurgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

horizontal ridge augmentation was done using piezosurgery tips and bone expanders

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

horizontal ridge augmentation by decompression technique.

Instead of a cover screw, a 2-mm healing abutment was used after implant insertion

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

horizontal ridge augmentation by ridge splitting technique using piezosurgery.

horizontal ridge augmentation was done using piezosurgery tips and bone expanders

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient's cooperation, motivation and good oral hygiene.
* Patient medically free from systemic diseases that absolutely contraindicate implant surgery.
* Moderately atrophic posterior mandible (horizontal alveolar dimension is not more than 4 mm at the crest), with minimum 10 mm vertical height.
* Patients prepared to comply with the follow-up and maintenance programme.
* Free from history of bruxism / parafunctional habits.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with local pathological disease such as cyst, tumor at the planned surgical site.
* Pregnant patients.
* Heavy smoker patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sara elmaghraby

assistant lecturer of oral and maxillofacial surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sara Elmagraby

Al Mansurah, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A03030821

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id