Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-18
2026-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Artificial Intelligence/Computer Guided Ridge Splitting for Treating Horizontal Ridge Defects
NCT06135506
Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Ridge Deficiencies
NCT06693921
Autobone and Bioactive Glass With Ridge Splitting
NCT04814160
Radiographic Assessment Of The Accuracy Of 3D Ridge Augmentation In Anterior Mandible Using Computer Guided Autogenous Cortical Shell Technique Versus Free Hand Technique
NCT06691516
Comparison Between Different Horizontal Ridge Augmentation Techniques
NCT06176417
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Implant-based dental rehabilitation of partly or completely edentulous areas has become a frequent procedure with consistent long-term outcomes in recent decades. Nevertheless, alveolar ridges are frequently impaired with horizontal inadequacy as a result of bone resorption, which has an impact on implant application.
The resorption of alveolar bone is a common sequelae of tooth loss and presents a clinical problem for implant placement. Implants must be placed with at least 1 mm of bone on the buccal and lingual aspects to maintain crestal bone levels.
Narrow edentulous ridges less than 5 mm wide present a challenge to the clinician for implant placement. Hence, lateral bone augmentation procedures are necessary to overcome maxillary and mandibular bone deficiencies. These procedures involve the use of bone augmentation, such as guided bone regeneration (GBR), bone block (autogenous or non-autogenous), and conventional onlay/inlay graft. Those procedures have many drawbacks such as longer healing time (6-9 months) for adequate bone regeneration before implant placement, the possibility of membrane exposure, an increased risk of infection, high cost, and rapid graft resorption; thus leading to inadequate bone regeneration or loss of the newly formed bone.
Based on previous knowledge, ridge split/expansion was introduced as an alternative to treat the width insufficiency of alveolar ridges with specific indications. The basic procedure includes a sagittal osteotomy in the center of the edentulous ridge, where the two cortical plates are expanded to increase the width and thereby simultaneous implant insertion with an appropriate diameter could be achieved.
Due to double cellularity and double vascularity gained from the lateral bony plate, bone healing, and regeneration tendency were significantly improved without the need for bone graft or membrane. A shorter treatment period, no need for donor sites, and the possibility of simultaneous implant placement are among the merits of ridge splitting over different augmentation techniques.
For successful ridge split with simultaneous implantation, the alveolar ridge width should be 3 mm or more with at least 1 mm trabecular bone between the cortical plates.
The splitting could be performed using the chisel and mallet, the surgical disc, ultra-fine fissure burs, and recently the piezoelectric surgical devices and the electromagnetic mallet. Osteotomes, chisels, bone spreaders, and engine-driven expanders were utilized for Ridge expansion.
The traditional ridge split technique might be performed simultaneously with implant placement, resulting in a shortened treatment time. However, this approach has the potential for serious complications, including buccal bone fracture, prolonged pain or paresthesia, and loss of bone height. On the other hand, the staged approach has been proposed with splitting and expansion performed followed by implant placement after a 3-week healing interval to allow re-establishment of the blood supply to the surgical site.
Linear Micro-Perforation Osteotomy (LMPO) has emerged as a less invasive alternative, promoting natural bone expansion through controlled micro-perforations in the cortical bone, allowing for ridge widening without extensive grafting. However, the precision required for LMPO can be difficult to achieve manually, especially in anatomically complex or narrow ridge areas, leading to variability in outcomes and potential risks such as bone fractures or inadequate expansion.
Computer-guided technology presents an opportunity to enhance LMPO by providing a structured, pre-planned guide for split-osteotomy and expansion. Utilizing 3D imaging data, a computer-guided splint can be custom-fabricated to fit each patient's unique anatomy, offering unparalleled accuracy in osteotomy execution and minimizing the risk of error. Additionally, performing LMPO without flap elevation with the assistance of this guided splint further reduces surgical trauma, preserves periosteal blood supply, and promotes faster healing, making it a more patient-friendly option.
Limited clinical data are available about LMPO. Our study aims to evaluate the efficacy, clinical, and radiological outcomes of the flapless AI-powered/computer-guided LMPO ridge split/expansion technique compared to the traditional LMPO ridge split/expansion method for lateral ridge reconstruction of mandibular horizontal ridge deficiencies.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
study group I
ridge split and expansion with free-hand linear micro perforation osteotomy approach with simultaneous implant placement
Free-hand linear micro perforation osteotomy and ridge splitting
AI-assisted/computer-guided linear micro perforation osteotomy and ridge splitting
study group II
ridge split and expansion with AI-assisted/computer-guided (linear micro perforation osteotomy approach with simultaneous implant placement)
AI-assisted/computer-guided linear micro perforation osteotomy and ridge splitting
AI-assisted/computer-guided crestal ridge splitting expansion after linear micro perforation osteotomy will be performed using electromagnetic mallet
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Free-hand linear micro perforation osteotomy and ridge splitting
AI-assisted/computer-guided linear micro perforation osteotomy and ridge splitting
AI-assisted/computer-guided linear micro perforation osteotomy and ridge splitting
AI-assisted/computer-guided crestal ridge splitting expansion after linear micro perforation osteotomy will be performed using electromagnetic mallet
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Minimum bone width of 3 mm
* Ridge width of not less than 3 mm in CBCT image
* Minimum bone height of 10 mm
* Proper inter-occlusal space
* Perioperative cone beam CT scan image of the atrophic ridge
Exclusion Criteria
* Heavy smokers.
* Current chemotherapy or radiotherapy.
* Alcohol or drug abuse.
* Pregnant women.
* Active infection.
* Inter-occlusal space not less than 7-8 mm.
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kafrelsheikh University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Walid Elamrousy
Assistant Professor of periodontology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
faculty of dentistry, kafrelsheikh University
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafrelsheikh, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KFSIRB200-467
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.