Computer Guided Modified Ridge Splitting Versus Free Hand Technique in Horizontal Deficiency in Posterior Mandible
NCT ID: NCT06195761
Last Updated: 2026-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-05-15
2026-06-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Computer Guided Versus Free Hand Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in Anterior Mandible.
NCT05556330
Radiographic Assessment of Guided Cortical Shell Technique for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
NCT06942013
Radiographic Assessment Of The Accuracy Of 3D Ridge Augmentation In Anterior Mandible Using Computer Guided Autogenous Cortical Shell Technique Versus Free Hand Technique
NCT06691516
The Efficiency of Computer Guided Ridge Splitting Using Piezosurgery in Horizontally Deficient Posterior Mandible
NCT03748615
Assessment of Vertical Ridge Augmentation for Posterior Mandible by Computer Guided Onlay vs Free Hand Onlay Graft
NCT05512078
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The second treatment plan includes manually harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area without a surgical guide.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
computer guided modified ridge splitting technique (study group)
The first treatment plan includes harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area using a computer-modified surgical guide.
computer guided modified ridge splitting technique in horizontal bone deficiency in posterior mandible
treatment plan includes harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area using a computer-modified surgical guide
conventional modified ridge splitting technique (control group)
The second treatment plan includes manually harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area without a surgical guide
free hand modified ridge splitting technique in horizontal bone deficiency in posterior mandible
treatment plan includes manually harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area without a surgical guide.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
computer guided modified ridge splitting technique in horizontal bone deficiency in posterior mandible
treatment plan includes harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area using a computer-modified surgical guide
free hand modified ridge splitting technique in horizontal bone deficiency in posterior mandible
treatment plan includes manually harvesting and fixing the bone graft in posterior mandibular area without a surgical guide.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age range from 25-55 years. No sex predilection.
* Patients free from any systemic conditions and bone metabolism diseases that might interfere with the surgical intervention, soft tissue or hard tissue healing.
* Patients of adequate alveolar bone width.
* Both genders males and females will be included
* Normal vertical dimension with normal inter-arch space. The minimum number of missing teeth in the posterior mandible alveolar ridge is two adjacent anterior teeth
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous grafting procedures in the edentulous area.
* General contraindications to implant surgery.
* Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation.
* Untreated periodontitis.
* Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
* Uncontrolled diabetes.
* Pregnant or nursing.
* Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised
* Heavy smokers
* Patients undergo medication interfere with bone healing
25 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mina ElHadidi Sobhi Ramzi Michael
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohamed Mounir Shaker, BDS,MSc,PHD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Cairo University
Rofaida Atef Abaas, BDS,MSc,PHD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry - Cairo University
Cairo, Manial, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Al-Ani O, Nambiar P, Ha KO, Ngeow WC. Safe zone for bone harvesting from the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24 Suppl A100:115-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02393.x. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
Sanchez-Labrador L, Molinero-Mourelle P, Perez-Gonzalez F, Saez-Alcaide LM, Brinkmann JC, Martinez JL, Martinez-Gonzalez JM. Clinical performance of alveolar ridge augmentation with xenogeneic bone block grafts versus autogenous bone block grafts. A systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Jun;122(3):293-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
De Stavola L, Fincato A, Bressan E, Gobbato L. Results of Computer-Guided Bone Block Harvesting from the Mandible: A Case Series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2017 Jan/Feb;37(1):e111-e119. doi: 10.11607/prd.2721.
Schwartz-Arad D, Levin L, Sigal L. Surgical success of intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for alveolar ridge augmentation. Implant Dent. 2005 Jun;14(2):131-8. doi: 10.1097/01.id.0000165031.33190.0d.
Assaf A, Saad M, Daas M, Abdallah J, Abdallah R. Use of narrow-diameter implants in the posterior jaw: a systematic review. Implant Dent. 2015 Jun;24(3):294-306. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000238.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
computer guided modified ridge
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.