Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting of Horizontal Deficient in Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Ridge

NCT ID: NCT03533309

Last Updated: 2018-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2019-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In patient with horizontal deficiency in alveolar ridge of the anterior maxilla, Dose computer Guided stent enhance the accuracy and clinical outcome vs conventional ridge splitting surgery????

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PICO P- Horizontal deficient alveolar ridge in Anterior Maxillary Region I- Computer guided surgical cutting guide C- Conventional alveolar ridge splitting O- Clinical outcome and radiographic outcomes Primary outcome: Accuracy In computer Guided: CBCT will performed pre-operative and post-operative for measure the difference of degree in superimposition after ridge splitting.

In conventional method: Ridge mapping will applied in preoperative clinical evaluation, and measure in post-operative, the difference in splitting will calculate in millimeter (mm) Secondary outcome: Thickness of buccal cortical plate In both technique CBCT will performed and measuring the Both Buccal and palatal cortical bone in millimeter(mm)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ridge Deficency

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

computer guided

Group (A): comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent.

.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Computer guided surgical cutting guide

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent

conventional

Group (B) comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional alveolar ridge splitting

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Computer guided surgical cutting guide

comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional alveolar ridge splitting

comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Partial edentulous in the aesthetic zone.
* Patient with bucco-lingual bone width is 3 mm or greater but \< 6mm
* Normal alveolar bone height
* Adequate oral hygiene
* Free of soft tissue or dental pathology
* Patients accepting to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient medically compromised.
* Uncooperative patient.
* Poor oral hygiene and periodontal disease.
* Patients who smoked and pregnant women
* Systemic disease directly affecting bone healing
* Atrophic ridges (1.5 mm or less)
* History of radiotherapy \& treatment with bisphosphonates.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

abdalrahman Aburas

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

abdelrahman akram aburass, master

Role: CONTACT

00201288769226

niveen asker

Role: CONTACT

00201001558769

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

152018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Autogenous Tooth Graft for Ridge Augmentation
NCT06416605 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA