Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting of Horizontal Deficient in Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Ridge
NCT ID: NCT03533309
Last Updated: 2018-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
14 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-01
2019-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Computer Guided Versus Free Hand Horizontal Ridge Augmentation in Anterior Mandible.
NCT05556330
Computer-guided vs. Conventional Cortical Shell Technique for Horizontal Augmentation
NCT05311332
Computer Guided Modified Ridge Splitting Versus Free Hand Technique in Horizontal Deficiency in Posterior Mandible
NCT06195761
Ridge Splitting Using Autogenous Bone Wedge Versus the Conventional Intercortical Augmentation Technique in Horizontally Deficient Anterior Maxilla
NCT06529653
Ridge Expansion by Osseodensification Simultaneously With Implant Placement in Narrow Alveolar Ridges
NCT03592381
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In conventional method: Ridge mapping will applied in preoperative clinical evaluation, and measure in post-operative, the difference in splitting will calculate in millimeter (mm) Secondary outcome: Thickness of buccal cortical plate In both technique CBCT will performed and measuring the Both Buccal and palatal cortical bone in millimeter(mm)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
computer guided
Group (A): comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent.
.
Computer guided surgical cutting guide
comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent
conventional
Group (B) comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique
Conventional alveolar ridge splitting
comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Computer guided surgical cutting guide
comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent
Conventional alveolar ridge splitting
comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with bucco-lingual bone width is 3 mm or greater but \< 6mm
* Normal alveolar bone height
* Adequate oral hygiene
* Free of soft tissue or dental pathology
* Patients accepting to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Uncooperative patient.
* Poor oral hygiene and periodontal disease.
* Patients who smoked and pregnant women
* Systemic disease directly affecting bone healing
* Atrophic ridges (1.5 mm or less)
* History of radiotherapy \& treatment with bisphosphonates.
16 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
abdalrahman Aburas
Doctor
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
152018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.