Evaluation of Horizontal Anterior Mandibular Augmentation With Split Bone Block Technique From the Chin

NCT ID: NCT06727591

Last Updated: 2024-12-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-10

Study Completion Date

2024-10-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to compare clinically and radiographically bone gain, healing of the surgical site, healing of the grafted bone and stability of the grafted area following horizontal ridge augmentation at anterior mandible using split bone block from the chin area.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alveolar Bone Grafting

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Horizontal Ridge Augmentation with Split Bone Block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Split Bone Block Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

An intraoral crestal incision with/out vertical arms was performed on alveolar ridge using blade no.15. After flap reflection, patroning the defect to help guide the area to be grafted from the donor site. At the chin area (donor site) unicortical cuts will be made at least 5 mm inferior to root tips, 5 mm superior to inferior border of mandible and 5 mm away from the mental foramen. The graft was luxated and split into two bone shells each 1 \~ 2 mm in thickness using disc. The bone shells and the donor site were scrapped for autogenous graft particles. Decortication of the recipient site. The graft was stabilised into the recipient site using two or more self tapping titanium screws placed midway corono-apical in the bone shell following the ridge contour. The autogenous particles were packed into the space between the split bone block and the ridge. Collagen sponge was used to cover the donor site. After 4 months the site was approached for implant placement using crestal incision

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Split Bone Block Technique

An intraoral crestal incision with/out vertical arms was performed on alveolar ridge using blade no.15. After flap reflection, patroning the defect to help guide the area to be grafted from the donor site. At the chin area (donor site) unicortical cuts will be made at least 5 mm inferior to root tips, 5 mm superior to inferior border of mandible and 5 mm away from the mental foramen. The graft was luxated and split into two bone shells each 1 \~ 2 mm in thickness using disc. The bone shells and the donor site were scrapped for autogenous graft particles. Decortication of the recipient site. The graft was stabilised into the recipient site using two or more self tapping titanium screws placed midway corono-apical in the bone shell following the ridge contour. The autogenous particles were packed into the space between the split bone block and the ridge. Collagen sponge was used to cover the donor site. After 4 months the site was approached for implant placement using crestal incision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient with missing anterior mandibular teeth
* horizontal bone width \< 5 mm
* Adequate zone of keratinized tissue

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of infection or periapical lesions in adjacent teeth
* Medically compromised patients with a condition that affect the procedure
* Insufficient inter-arch distance
* Bruxism or clenching
* Alcoholism
* Smokers
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

hossam samy mohamed saleh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

hossam samy mohamed saleh

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University

Alexandria, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

#8/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id