Assessment of Bone Gain Following Composite Graft Rehabilitation of Horizontal Maxilla Atrophy With Sausage Technique Utilizing (Pericardial) Collagen Membrane
NCT ID: NCT06831214
Last Updated: 2025-02-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
22 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-02-01
2025-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Reconstruction of Deficient Maxillary Ridges Using Retromolar Blocks With and Without Collagen Membrane
NCT06900933
Assessment of GBR in Augmentation of Horizontally Atrophic Maxillary Ridge Using Collagen Membrane Versus Using Titanium Mesh
NCT03635658
Reconstruction of Deficient Atrophic Ridges Using Guide Bone Regeneration Technique
NCT06746935
Radiographic and Histological Assessment of Autogenous Onlay Block Versus Cortical Shell on Anterior Maxilla
NCT06450535
Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxillary Ridges Using Mandibular Blocks With and Without Coverage Using Collagen Membrane
NCT04462575
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, to guarantee the success of implant stability at the time of insertion, a sufficient amount of bone width is robust. As known that bone surrounding extracted teeth resorb in all directions. This leads to horizontal and vertical bone volume loss reaching up to 50% in width reduction which compromises dental implant insertion. Cawood and Howell in 1988 categorized the degrees of edentulous ridge atrophy into six categories, emphasizing category IV atrophies which are known as "knife-edge" ridge, present a serious horizontal defect, making dental implant placement a challenge.
The challenge of bone defects augmentation primarily lies in the insufficient bone volume at the implant site, which can negatively impact the success of dental implants. Severe horizontal bone defects, such as those classified as "knife-edge" ridges, present significant obstacles for effective implant placement. Sausage Technique: Specifically designed for cases with severely thin ridges, this technique utilizes a collagen membrane stabilized with titanium pins to secure the bone graft. This helps prevent the migration or collapse of graft particles, promoting better bone gain and healing. Still some limitation of this technique including possibility of the collagen membrane becoming exposed during the healing process, which can compromise the regenerative outcome. Limited Bone Gain: In some cases, the amount of bone gain achieved may not meet the expectations, particularly in severely atrophic ridges, which can lead to the need for additional augmentation procedures. A study by Fernando V, et al showed that recipient sites augmented with autogenous bone grafts and preserved periosteal membranes maintained an average bucco-lingual width of 8.1 mm after augmentation, which was significantly greater than the baseline width of 3.2 mm. This augmented width was maintained at 98% after an average follow-up of 2.9 years. Another study by Kubota and Shirasuna evaluates the effectiveness of free periosteum in secondary bone grafting for maxillary alveolar clefts.
Results indicate that 97.1% of patients receiving free periosteum achieved significant vertical bone formation, compared to 79.5% in the control group. While the free-periosteum group experienced a higher rate of postoperative wound dehiscence. The rationale of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a combination of autogenous bone and an organic bovine bone-derived mineral (ABBM) for horizontal ridge augmentation using sausage technique utilizing (pericardial) collagen membrane versus Periosteal membrane harvested from the iliac crest. The study aimed to Assess bone gain in insufficient maxillary alveolar ridge width, particularly in patients with knife-edge ridges, to facilitate successful dental implant placement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
pericardial collagen membrane
Sausage Technique: Specifically designed for cases with severely thin ridges, this technique utilizes a collagen membrane stabilized with titanium pins to secure the bone graft. This helps prevent the migration or collapse of graft particles, promoting better bone gain and healing
(pericardial) collagen membrane
bone gain following composite graft rehabilitation of horizontal maxilla atrophy with sausage technique utilizing (pericardial) collagen membrane
periosteal Membrane harvested from anterior iliac bone
The choice of comparators in clinical studies involving guided bone regeneration (GBR) often includes both nonresorbable and resorbable membranes. Resorbable membranes have demonstrated better soft tissue compatibility compared to nonresorbable options, making them a preferred choice in many cases. For instance, studies have shown that using an organic bovine bone-derived mineral (ABBM) in conjunction with a rapidly resorbing natural collagen membrane is effective for horizontal ridge augmentation, as evidenced by positive histologic outcomes.
periosteal Membrane harvested from anterior iliac bone
The choice of comparators in clinical studies involving guided bone regeneration (GBR) often includes both nonresorbable and resorbable membranes. Resorbable membranes have demonstrated better soft tissue compatibility compared to nonresorbable options, making them a preferred choice in many cases. For instance, studies have shown that using an organic bovine bone-derived mineral (ABBM) in conjunction with a rapidly resorbing natural collagen membrane is effective for horizontal ridge augmentation, as evidenced by positive histologic outcomes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
(pericardial) collagen membrane
bone gain following composite graft rehabilitation of horizontal maxilla atrophy with sausage technique utilizing (pericardial) collagen membrane
periosteal Membrane harvested from anterior iliac bone
The choice of comparators in clinical studies involving guided bone regeneration (GBR) often includes both nonresorbable and resorbable membranes. Resorbable membranes have demonstrated better soft tissue compatibility compared to nonresorbable options, making them a preferred choice in many cases. For instance, studies have shown that using an organic bovine bone-derived mineral (ABBM) in conjunction with a rapidly resorbing natural collagen membrane is effective for horizontal ridge augmentation, as evidenced by positive histologic outcomes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with unilateral or bilateral horizontal atrophy in maxilla with minimum 1 quadrant.
* No intervention done previously on the donor and host sides.
* No sex predilection
Exclusion Criteria
* bone metabolism \& systemic diseases.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Manaf Omar Alhabshi
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Manaf O Alhabshi, Msc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1-25
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.