Custom-made Ceramic Barrier vs Titanium Mesh

NCT ID: NCT03734094

Last Updated: 2018-12-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2018-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is a comparative study between custom-made ceramic barrier and titanium mesh for augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ceramic Barrier

The use of a ceramic barrier to induce bone formation during GBR

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Titanium Mesh

Intervention Type DEVICE

The use of a titanium mesh to induce bone formation during GBR

Titanium mesh

The use of a titanium mesh to induce bone formation during GBR

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ceramic barrier

Intervention Type DEVICE

The use of a ceramic barrier to induce bone formation during GBR

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ceramic barrier

The use of a ceramic barrier to induce bone formation during GBR

Intervention Type DEVICE

Titanium Mesh

The use of a titanium mesh to induce bone formation during GBR

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with atrophic posterior mandible
* Both sexes
* No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology
* No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement

Exclusion Criteria

* Untreated gingivitis
* Periodontitis
* Insufficient oral hygiene
* Previous radiation therapy
* Head and neck neoplasia
* Systemic disorders
* Heavy smokers
* Bone pathology
* Psychiatric problems
* Emotional instability
* Unrealistic aesthetic demands
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mohamed El Saharty

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

737

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id