Assessment of Efficacy of Prebent Titanium Mesh Versus Customized Poly-ether Ether Ketone Mesh for Three Dimensional Augmentation in Deficient Maxillary Ridge. a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-01

Study Completion Date

2025-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In conclusion, the choice between titanium and PEEK meshes should consider patient-specific factors, clinical requirements, and surgeon expertise. The PEEK mesh, with its patient customized design enabled by CAD/CAM technology, offers significant advantages, including greater gained bone volume and reduced operative time. Its tailored fabrication ensures precise adaptation to the patient's anatomy, effectively maintaining the space required for optimal bone formation. The integration of such advanced technologies in regenerative procedures represents a significant step forward in achieving predictable outcomes and enhancing patient care. However, continued innovation and evaluation are crucial to refine these approaches and expand their applicability in oral rehabilitation

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Custom-Made 3D PEEK for Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fractures.

NCT07156812

Mandibular Angle Fracture Three Dimensional Polyetheretherketone

COMPLETED PHASE4

Graftless Technique in Open Maxillary Sinus Lifting Using PEEK Versus Ti -Meshwork

NCT06846632

Maxillary Sinus

COMPLETED NA

Augmentation of Atrophic Mandibule Using Poly Ether Ether Ketone Mesh

NCT04017117

Mandible Small

UNKNOWN NA

Ridge Augmentation Using Patient Specific PEEK Sheets vs. Autogenous Bone Shell Technique.

NCT03607006

Ridge Deficiency

COMPLETED NA

Custom-made Ceramic Barrier vs Titanium Mesh

NCT03734094

Bone Loss

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Deficient Alveolar Bone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

prebent titanium mesh

participants receive alveolar ridge augmentation using pre-bent titanium mesh

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ti mesh

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

prebent titamesh on a 3-d virtually augmented model

3d peek mesh

participants receive maxillary ridge augmentation using 3d milled peek mesh

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

3d peek mesh

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

milled 3d peek mesh

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ti mesh

prebent titamesh on a 3-d virtually augmented model

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

3d peek mesh

milled 3d peek mesh

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 1\. Adult patient of both sexes presenting with partially edentulous maxillary ridge with horizontal bone defect. 2. The horizontal ridge dimension measured 2mm below the alveolar crest should range from 2-5 mm. 3. No local pathosis that may interfere with bone healing. 4. Good oral hygiene. 5. Age between 20-65 years old.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient taking any medication that may interfere with normal bone physiology or impair bone healing. 2. All patients suffering from any systemic disease that may affect bone healing. 3. Heavy smokers (more than 10 cigarette per day) 4. Patients with parafunctional habits such as bruxism and clenching 5. Poor interest and cooperation from the patient. 6. Patients that have undergone any horizontal augmentation procedure at the site of interest

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes