Clinical and Radiographical Assessment of Patients With Sub-condylar Fracture Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Trapezoidal Plates Versus Titanium Trapezoidal Plates

NCT ID: NCT06940115

Last Updated: 2025-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Some of titanium's drawbacks that is commonly used in maxillofacial surgery included scatter artefacts on regular imaging, implant exposure and inflammation, high thermal conductivity, and high elastic modulus. Very few clinical studies have been published on using a PEEK plate in the mandibular fractures and to the best of the author's knowledge, this is the first study that will be done comparing trapezoidal condylar 3D printed PEEK plates and titanium trapezoidal condylar plate in subcondylar fractures in terms of clinical and radiographical outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Mandibular subcondylar fractures are common injuries that require treatment to restore function and aesthetic. Titanium plates have long been the gold standard for fixation in these fractures due to their strength, durability, and ability to provide rigid stabilization. However, they are associated with limitations such as a higher elastic modulus than bone, imaging artifacts (e.g., CT or MRI interference), and hardware-related complications. These drawbacks have prompted interest in alternative materials like polyetheretherketone (PEEK).

PEEK is a novel biomaterial with promising properties, including biocompatibility, a modulus of elasticity closer to bone, and reduced imaging artifacts. These characteristics suggest it may mitigate some of the challenges associated with titanium plates. The improved elasticity of PEEK could reduce stress shielding and enhance functional recovery, while its imaging compatibility could simplify postoperative assessments.

Researchers have shown significant interest in the application of PEEK composites in trauma plating systems, total replacement implants, and tissue scaffolds, highlighting its potential as a versatile biomaterial. Despite these advantages, evidence specifically evaluating PEEK trapezoidal plates for subcondylar fractures remains scarce, there are a no clinical studies directly comparing the outcomes of PEEK and titanium trapezoidal plates in terms of clinical outcomes. Conducting a study to evaluate these two materials would provide valuable evidence to guide material selection in mandibular subcondylar fracture management.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Condylar Neck Fractures Polyetheretherketone Mandible Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group

CAD/CAM titanium trapezoidal plates

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

titanium trapezoidal plates

Intervention Type OTHER

ORIF subcondylar fracture using trapezoidal titanium plates

comparator group

CAD/CAM polyetheretherketone (PEEK) trapezoidal plates

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PEEK trapezoidal plates

Intervention Type OTHER

ORIF subcondylar fracture using trapezoidal PEEK plates

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

titanium trapezoidal plates

ORIF subcondylar fracture using trapezoidal titanium plates

Intervention Type OTHER

PEEK trapezoidal plates

ORIF subcondylar fracture using trapezoidal PEEK plates

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged 18 years or older, irrespective of gender
* Recent mandibular subcondylar fractures indicated for open reduction and internal fixation

Exclusion Criteria

* Medically compromised patients contradicting operation (ASA III, IV \& V).
* Patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
* Infection at the fracture line.
* Pathological fractures and old fractures
* comminuted fractures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ibrahim Yousef Badrasawi

principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PEEK plate in condyle fracture

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.