A Comparative Study Between Three Different Plating Techniques in Management of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.
NCT ID: NCT06323122
Last Updated: 2024-03-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
60 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-01-01
2023-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
3D Interlocking Miniplates in Fixation of Mandibular Fractures in the Mental Foramen Region: A Split-mouth Study
NCT06939010
InterFlex Plate Versus Conventional Miniplates in the Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures.
NCT06740292
Evaluation of Z-shaped Bone Plates in Management of Mandibular Fractures
NCT07184762
Evaluation of Modified Omega Plate in the Management of Mandibular Fractures Compared With Conventional Fixation
NCT07206134
Clinical Assessment of Computer-assisted PEEK Versus Conventional Titanium Plates on Mandibular Body Fractures
NCT03466190
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of the current study was to compare between the effect of two miniplates, 2.3 high profile Miniplates and three dimensional (3D) Miniplates for internal fixation treatment of mandibular para-symphyseal fractures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
group (I)
ORIF was done using two 2.0 miniplates
2.0 miniplates
2.0 miniplates
Group II
ORIF was done using 2.3 high profile miniplates
2.3 high profile miniplates
2.3 high profile miniplates
Group III
ORIF was done using 3D miniplates.
3D miniplates
3D miniplates
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
2.0 miniplates
2.0 miniplates
2.3 high profile miniplates
2.3 high profile miniplates
3D miniplates
3D miniplates
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients presenting within 7 days of trauma.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Medically compromised patients who are unfit for management under General Anesthesia
3. Patients with gross infection at the site of fracture
4. Patients not willing to return for follow-up
5. Patients with associated bone pathology
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
October 6 University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nermine Ramadan Mahmoud
Associated Professor of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Oral Surgery Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nermine Ramadan Mahmoud, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Associated Professor of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Oral Surgery Department
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
October 6U
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hu W, Agrawal M, Thadani S, Mukul SK, Sood R, Patel A, Dhanak R, Tailor S. Comparative evaluation of a single 2.0-mm AO locking reconstruction plate with conventional miniplate osteosynthesis for treatment of linear non-comminuted fractures of symphysis and parasymphsis region of the mandible. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Feb;120(1):11-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Plating Techniques 2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.