Clinical Assessment of Computer-assisted PEEK Versus Conventional Titanium Plates on Mandibular Body Fractures
NCT ID: NCT03466190
Last Updated: 2018-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-08-02
2019-03-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical and Radiographical Assessment of Patients With Sub-condylar Fracture Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Trapezoidal Plates Versus Titanium Trapezoidal Plates
NCT06940115
A Comparative Study Between Three Different Plating Techniques in Management of Mandibular Parasymphyseal Fractures.
NCT06323122
Patient Centered Outcomes and Marginal Bone Changes in CAD/CAM Metallic and (PEEK) Partial Denture Frameworks
NCT05622448
InterFlex Plate Versus Conventional Miniplates in the Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures.
NCT06740292
Patient-Specific Guides vs. Classical Workflow in Class IV Mandibular Fracture Fixation
NCT07153354
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Inclusion criteria:
All subjects were required:
1. Patients with at least a unilateral body fracture indicated for Open reduction internal fixation alone or in combination with fracture elsewhere in the mandible or midface.
2. All ages and both sexes were included in this study.
3. Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome.
4. Patients with good general condition allowing major surgical procedure under general anesthesia.
5. Patients with physical and psychological tolerance.
Exclusion criteria:
1. Patients with high risk systemic diseases like uncontrolled diabetes . As uncontrolled diabetes has a negative impact on normal bone healing.
2. Patients with old fractures. As they will affect accuracy of reduction of the fractured segments.
3. Patients with physical and psychological intolerance. As psychological stress will affect the immune system and patient's fitness including healing capacity.
Interventions:
Eligible patients will be randomized in equal proportions between the study group (PEEK custom made plates) and the control group (titanium plates).
A- Computer-assisted PEEK custom made plates:
* All cases will undergo surgery under general anesthesia.
* Exposure of the fractured segments will be done using a standardized surgical approach.
* The fractured segments will be reduced in normal anatomic position guided by customized plate.
* Fracture fragments will be fixed using PEEK custom made plate utilizing 2.0 mm screws.
B- Conventional titanium plates:
* All cases will undergo surgery under general anesthesia.
* Exposure of the fractured segments will be done using a standardized surgical approach.
* Inter-maxillary fixation will be done.
* The fractured segments will be reduced in normal anatomic position guided by occlusion.
* The fracture fragments will be fixed using 2.3 titanium plate on the inferior border and 2.0 titanium plate on the superior border utilizing bone screws.
Follow up:
Clinical evaluation will be performed at the first week postoperative. Computed tomography will be performed at the first week postoperative then patients will be recalled for clinical evaluation every week for one month. Final follow up visit will be at 3 months postoperative.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
* A trial will be carried out in hospital of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery department- Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo University
* Equal randomization: participants with equal probabilities for intervention.
* Positive controlled: Both groups receiving treatment.
* Parallel group study: Each group of patients receives a single treatment simultaneously.
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Custom made PEEK plate fixation
Open Reduction Internal Fixation using Custom made PEEK plates.
Custom made PEEK plate fixation
Under General Anesthesia, exposure of the fractured mandibular body segments will be done using a standardized surgical approach. Open Reduction Internal Fixation using custom made PEEK plates will be performed.
Titanium plate fixation
Open Reduction Internal Fixation using conventional titanium plating system.
Titanium plate fixation
Under General Anesthesia, exposure of the fractured mandibular body segments will be done using a standardized surgical approach. Open Reduction Internal Fixation using conventional titanium plates will be performed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Titanium plate fixation
Under General Anesthesia, exposure of the fractured mandibular body segments will be done using a standardized surgical approach. Open Reduction Internal Fixation using conventional titanium plates will be performed.
Custom made PEEK plate fixation
Under General Anesthesia, exposure of the fractured mandibular body segments will be done using a standardized surgical approach. Open Reduction Internal Fixation using custom made PEEK plates will be performed.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. All ages and both sexes were included in this study.
3. Patients should be free from any systemic disease that may affect normal healing of bone, and predictable outcome.
4. Patients with good general condition allowing major surgical procedure under general anesthesia.
5. Patients with physical and psychological tolerance.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients with systemic diseases like uncontrolled diabetes mellitus. Because uncontrolled diabetes mellitus has a negative impact on normal bone healing.
3. Patients with old and/or mal-union fractures. As they will affect accuracy of reduction of the fractured segments.
4. Patient with bad oral hygiene. As it has an influence on normal osseous healing
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Rofaida Atef Atef
Assistant lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Khaled Amr, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine -Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine -Cairo University
Cairo, Giza Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Open reduction and rigid internal fixation of mandibular condylar fractures by an intraoral approach: a long-term follow-up study of 15 patients
Accuracy of the Computer-Aided Surgical Simulation (CASS) System in the Treatment of Patients With Complex Craniomaxillofacial Deformity: A Pilot Study.
A Comparative Evaluation of Fixation Techniques in Anterior Mandibular Fractures Using 2.0 mm Monocortical Titanium Miniplates Versus 2.4 mm Cortical Titanium Lag Screws
Titanium osteosynthesis hardware in maxillofacial trauma surgery: to remove or remain? A retrospective study.
Camerani, et al. Reconstruction of frontal bone using specific implant polyether-ether-ketone
The effect of diabetes mellitus on osseous healing.
Unfavourable outcomes in maxillofacial injuries: How to avoid and manage
Stress-induced immune dysregulation: Implications for wound healing, infectious disease and cancer
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEBD-CU-2018-02-27
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.