Graftless Technique in Open Maxillary Sinus Lifting Using PEEK Versus Ti -Meshwork

NCT ID: NCT06846632

Last Updated: 2025-02-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-03

Study Completion Date

2024-11-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to assess the amount of bone formation with PEEK (intervention group) in comparison with Titanium Meshwork (control group) in maxillary sinus lifting using CBCT and assessment of the biocompatibility of the Meshwork and PEEK with the schniederian membrane integrity.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All patients involved in this study will be divided into two equal groups, each group will be; (Tested group): PEEK after maxillary sinus lifts (Caldwell luc approach). (Control group): Titanium meshwork after maxillary sinus lifts (Caldwell luc approach).

Clinical evaluation:

A through medical and dental history followed by clinical examination was carried out for all patients. Clinical measurements were taken to ensure patient adherence to our initial inclusion criteria prior to further investigations.

A preoperative digital panoramic radiograph with 1:1 magnification was taken for each patient as a primary survey in order to exclude the presence of any lesion at the area of interest and take a primary measurement for the residual bone height of maxillary sinus.

CBCT will be taken in order to design the custom-made PEEK model and its guide of external window before the milling.

Intra operative procedures for two groups:

The operation was carried out with the patient under local anesthesia (2% Lido HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine). The perioral areas were aseptically prepared. A crestal incision was made on the midline of the gingiva attached to the edentulous ridge. The flap was elevated carefully and extended labially to expose the bone. A mesial and distal vertical releasing incision will be made as needed. The mucosal flap was denuded subperiosteally to fully expose the sharp and thin alveolar ridge and the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus. Extreme care was taken to radically elevate the sinus membrane from the lateral access window opened by using an electric-motor drill with appropriate water cooling. The floor, lateral wall, medial and posterior wall of the sinus membrane were meticulously detached and pushed upward for the placement of PEEK in intervention group and titanium meshwork in control group.

• Follow up: Patients will be evaluated after 3 days and weekly for the first month and then after 6 months Radiographic assessment will be achieved by CBCT scan 6 months postoperatively to calculate the amount of vertical bone gain.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Maxillary Sinus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

placement of titanium meshwork after maxillary sinus lifting

placement of titanium meshwork after maxillary sinus lifting

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

titanium meshwork

Intervention Type DEVICE

placement of titanium meshwork after maxillary sinus lifting

placement of PEEK after maxillary sinus lifting

placement of PEEK after maxillary sinus lifting

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PEEK

Intervention Type DEVICE

placement of PEEK after maxillary sinus lifting

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PEEK

placement of PEEK after maxillary sinus lifting

Intervention Type DEVICE

titanium meshwork

placement of titanium meshwork after maxillary sinus lifting

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

poly ether ether ketone

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Posterior edentulous ridges with pneumatized maxillary sinus and remaining bone height of 3 to 6 mm.

* Patient age ranges from 25 to 50 years.
* ASA physical status I and II.
* Patients willing to be a part of the study and ready to give their consent in writing for the same.
* Patient not complains from maxillary sinusitis
* Patients are free from T.M.J disorders, abnormal oral habits such as bruxism.
* Patient with good oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Untreated gingivitis, periodontitis.

* Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation.
* Untreated periodontitis.
* Insufficient oral hygiene and motivation.
* Pregnant or nursing.
* Bone pathology.
* Patient with blood disease.
* Patient with any systematic disease that may affect normal healing.
* Active infection or severe inflammation in the area intended for implant placement.
* Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

mohamed gamal hammad

MSc degree of oral and maxillofacial surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

33-6-24

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cranioplasty Using Titanium Mesh Vs Bone Cement
NCT06662903 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2