The Effect of Jigsaw Technique Used in Critical Article Review on Critical Thinking Disposition and Communication Skills

NCT ID: NCT05864781

Last Updated: 2024-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

112 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-12

Study Completion Date

2025-08-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

For nursing education to be sufficient to provide students with the contemporary roles required by the profession, education programs should be provided that will enable students to participate in the learning-teaching process actively. One of these programs is cooperative learning methods. The jigsaw learning technique, one of the collaborative learning methods, creates a contemporary learning model by providing a positive learning environment, individualization of students and the development of a sense of responsibility. Since distance education has become widespread worldwide, it is necessary to use these methods to increase interaction and group work in distance education.

Aim: This study aims to determine the effect of the Jigsaw technique used in critical article reviews given by distance education on the critical thinking disposition and communication skills of nursing students.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For nursing education to be sufficient to provide students with the contemporary roles required by the profession, education programs should be provided that will enable students to participate in the learning-teaching process actively. One of these programs is cooperative learning methods. The jigsaw learning technique, one of the collaborative learning methods, creates a contemporary learning model by providing a positive learning environment, individualization of students and the development of a sense of responsibility. Since distance education has become widespread worldwide, it is necessary to use these methods to increase interaction and group work in distance education.

Aim: This study aims to determine the effect of the Jigsaw technique used in critical article reviews given by distance education on the critical thinking disposition and communication skills of nursing students.

Method: This is a quasi-experimental study. The study will be carried out in the Spring Semester of the 2022-2023 Academic Year, with the students who attend the Research in Nursing Course with distance education at the Nursing Department of the Faculty of Health Sciences of Duzce University. The study is planned to comprise 112 students, 56 students in each group, taking into account possible losses. The sample was calculated using the G\*Power 3.1.9.7 programme.

Data accumulation methods: In the study, descriptive features form, critical thinking disposition scale and communication skills scale will be used as data collection tools.

Pre-tests will be administered to the students in the control group after the theoretical part of the course is over. Individual homework will be given to the students and they will be provided to analyze articles under the supervision of the researcher. Post-tests will be applied.

Students in the experimental group will be administered a pre-test. Students will be heterogeneously divided into eight groups according to their academic grade point average. The groups will consist of 7 people. Each student will be responsible for one of the 7 article sections. These sections are: 1) Title - Abstract 2) Introduction 3) Method 4) Results 5) Discussion 6) Conclusion and Recommendations 7) Limitations - Resources. Within the group, it will be determined which member will be responsible for which article section.

Students who have chosen the same article section in their main groups will come together to form expert groups. These expert groups are called "Peer critical article review" groups. After the expert groups are determined, they will come together and learn the article section they will be experts on. To ensure positive group cohesion during the group process in expert group work, members will be assigned one of the responsibilities of group leader, reporter, and monitoring the participation of members. The researcher will answer the questions asked by the students during the expert group work and provide support to the groups (3 hours).

Students who are experts in their chosen article section return to their main groups to share their knowledge. Each group reviews one descriptive research and presents their review (3 hours). The instructor advises and selects the first group. The first group wins a research award with the support of the lecturers.

Experiences in the process are shared and Post-tests are applied.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Education, Distance Students, Nursing

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

With the students in the control group, a standard individual article review will be conducted under the supervision of the instructor.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Experimental group

The students in the experimental group will be divided into 8 main groups of 7 students according to their academic grade point average. In these groups, each member will be responsible for one of the 7 sections of the article. Those who take the same section in the groups will unite to form expert groups and specialize by working on this section. Students will then return to their main groups and analyze an experimental article. From the groups presenting their reviews, a winner will be selected and a prize will be awarded.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Jigsaw Technique

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Jigsaw technique is one of the cooperative learning methods. A topic planned to be learned in the lesson is divided into sections and these sections are distributed to the students in the main group. Students who are responsible for the same sections in the groups combine to form expert groups and specialize by working on the subject. They then return to their main group to share their knowledge and make a presentation on the topic.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Jigsaw Technique

Jigsaw technique is one of the cooperative learning methods. A topic planned to be learned in the lesson is divided into sections and these sections are distributed to the students in the main group. Students who are responsible for the same sections in the groups combine to form expert groups and specialize by working on the subject. They then return to their main group to share their knowledge and make a presentation on the topic.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Students must volunteer to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Students who decline to participate in the study
* Students who will not be able to participate in the application continuously
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duzce University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Merve Cakar, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duzce University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duzce University

Düzce, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DuzceU-merve-0001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

7E Model in Nursing Education
NCT06689306 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA