Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-01
2022-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Background: From a person-centred care approach, the fostering of authentic relationships with patients is key for therapeutic benefits. Therefore, it is essential to help nurses to establish meaningful relationships with patients and help them to achieve these abilities. In this line, clinical narratives can be used as a way to promote reflective practice and professional competences development between nurses. A guide to evaluate the knowledge, skills, attitudes and values necessary for developing authentic encounters with patients reflected by nurses on clinical narratives was developed and implemented.
Design: Design and evaluation of the RCGT, and evaluation of its implementation Methods: This study was conducted in three major steps. Step one entailed the conceptualization. Step two included the generation of items and content validation. Then, in step three, the tool was used to independently evaluate 25 narratives by two researchers, in order to identify and exemplify the attributes of the nurse patient relationship defined on the guide and identify barriers and facilitators. One of the narratives was linguistically analysed in the light of the guide, in order to provide a comprehensive view of the interpretative strategies deployed by evaluators.
Results: The RCGT helped to identify nursing professional competences reflected in clinical narratives. The tool guided in the process of assigning scores to the corresponding items. The use of the tool helped to identify some barriers and facilitators before and during the narrative evaluation process.
Conclusions: A clear, relevant, conceptually and linguistically adequate guide for assessing clinical narratives was obtained. The RCGT can be applied to accurately interpret how nurses reflect professional competences in a clinical narrative as a preliminary step to design a measurement tool.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Nursing Narratives, Reflective Practice and Professional Development (NarratUN)
NCT03791411
Communication Practices to Develop the Health Literacy Competencies in Nursing Students
NCT06490406
Evaluation of a Communication Skills Training for Nurses
NCT05700929
Simulation Training in Undergraduate Nursing Education as a Means to Improve Awareness of Team Member Roles
NCT02289001
Debriefing Styles and Clinical Judgment in Nursing Students
NCT07262424
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Writing a clinical narrative
The participants had to write a clinical narrative regarding a significant encounter with a patient.
Writing a clinical narrative
The participants had to write a clinical narrative regarding a significant encounter with a patient.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Writing a clinical narrative
The participants had to write a clinical narrative regarding a significant encounter with a patient.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* nurses from different hospitals and clinical departments/services, such as general hospital wards, intensive care units, outpatient services, and other departments (i.e., perioperative, elder care, and haemodialysis, emergency, etc).
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ana Choperena
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ana Choperena, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Navarra
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra
Pamplona, Navarre, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Choperena A, Oroviogoicoechea C, Zaragoza Salcedo A, Olza Moreno I, Jones D. Nursing narratives and reflective practice: A theoretical review. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Aug;75(8):1637-1647. doi: 10.1111/jan.13955. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
Choperena A, Pardavila-Belio MI, Errasti-Ibarrondo B, Oroviogoicoechea C, Zaragoza-Salcedo A, Goni-Viguria R, Martin-Perez S, Llacer T, La Rosa-Salas V. Implementation and evaluation of a training programme to promote the development of professional competences in nursing: A pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Apr;87:104360. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104360. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020.002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.