Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
140 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-08-01
2022-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Communication Skill Training Program for Occupational Therapy Interns
NCT05434221
Client Understanding, Expectations, and Intern Performance in Occupational Therapy
NCT07333794
Effects of Communication Training for Mental Health Occupational Therapy Interns
NCT07333781
A Family-centered Teaching Model in Pediatric Occupational Therapy Internship
NCT06519461
The Effectiveness of Using Empathy Courses to Guide OT Students in Case-base Clinical Reasoning
NCT05479110
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CST-SF group
The feedback process was as follows. Feedback was given after each interview, including brief feedback and SF. Brief feedback was provided by the clinical instructor based on the Gap-Kalamazoo Communication Skills Assessment Form immediately after each interview. Within two weeks after the first and second interviews, the interns received SF from experts and clinical instructors based on the Communication Skills Measure for Therapist. The SF of the third interview could not be completed because the internship had ended.
specific feedback based on an in-depth assessment tool for communication skills training
In addition to the specific feedback based on an in-depth assessment tool, four strategies modified from common strategies in the previous studies were incorporated into the intervention protocol, including lecture, patient interview, brief feedback, and self-reflection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
specific feedback based on an in-depth assessment tool for communication skills training
In addition to the specific feedback based on an in-depth assessment tool, four strategies modified from common strategies in the previous studies were incorporated into the intervention protocol, including lecture, patient interview, brief feedback, and self-reflection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
TZU-TING CHEN, Master
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chang Gung Medical Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Niaosong Dist, Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gillis AE, Morris MC, Ridgway PF. Communication skills assessment in the final postgraduate years to established practice: a systematic review. Postgrad Med J. 2015 Jan;91(1071):13-21. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132772. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
van Es JM, Schrijver CJ, Oberink RH, Visser MR. Two-dimensional structure of the MAAS-Global rating list for consultation skills of doctors. Med Teach. 2012;34(12):e794-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.709652. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
Riess H, Kraft-Todd G. E.M.P.A.T.H.Y.: a tool to enhance nonverbal communication between clinicians and their patients. Acad Med. 2014 Aug;89(8):1108-12. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000287.
Epstein RM, Street RL Jr. Shared mind: communication, decision making, and autonomy in serious illness. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;9(5):454-61. doi: 10.1370/afm.1301.
Fallowfield L, Jenkins V. Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 1999 Oct;35(11):1592-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00212-9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202001194B0
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.