The Effects of Autonomy and Perceptions on Resistance Training Outcomes
NCT ID: NCT05371587
Last Updated: 2025-03-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
129 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-05-01
2024-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Investigating the Feasibility and Acceptability of Co-created Intervention to Improve Women's Participation in Muscle-strengthening Exercises
NCT07095322
Post-activation Performance Enhancement Improves
NCT06825065
Effects of Resistance Training Preconditioning on Skeletal Muscle Recovery From a Period of Disuse in Young Adults
NCT05760066
Individual Response to Different Volumes of Resistance Training
NCT02179307
Resistance Training, Detraining, and Retraining Study 2022
NCT05553769
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A - Standard resistance training prescription
Standard resistance training prescription: participants will perform three sessions per week comprised of six resistance training exercises - horizontal leg press, lat-pulldown, knee extension, chest press, leg curls and shoulder press. They will perform 3 sets of 10 repetitions using 65% percent of the maximal load that can be lifted once according to a one repetition maximum (1RM) test. Their progression model will be as follows:
Weeks 1-3 65%1RM; Weeks 4-6 70%1RM; 1RM reassessment at week 6; Weeks 7-9 70% of the updated 1RM; Weeks 10-12 75%1RM.
Prior to beginning of the program four visits will take place:
1. Laboratory visit for measuring physiological and anthropometric outcomes (see outcomes section)
2. 1RM testing
3. Endurance and maximal voluntary contraction testing + introduction with the exercise program
4. A second introduction session with the exercise program
Standard prescription
Standard resistance training prescription, based on international organization's guidelines.
B- Autonomy and perceptions approach to resistance training (APART)
Participants will perform 3 sessions/week of the same exercises. They will perform 3 sets of each exercise, self-select the load they lift in each set and perform repetitions aiming to reach a level of effort of 7-8 on a 0-10 rating of perceived effort scale (RPE) at the end of the set. Their progression model will be as follows: Weeks 1-3 RPE 7/10; Weeks 4-12 RPE 8/10. The selected RPE score of 7 and then 8 out of 10 has been shown to lead to increases in maximal strength in previous research. Prior to beginning of the program four visits will take place:
1. Laboratory visit (similar to standard).
2. 1RM testing where the principles of perceived effort will be introduced.
3. Endurance and maximal voluntary contraction testing + introduction with the exercise program. Participants will practice how to self-select the load they prefer and then perform repetitions leading to the target RPE score.
4. A second introduction session with the exercise program and the RPE construct.
Autonomy and Perceptions Approach to Resistance Training (APART)
Alternative resistance training prescription based on trainees' autonomy and perceptions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Autonomy and Perceptions Approach to Resistance Training (APART)
Alternative resistance training prescription based on trainees' autonomy and perceptions.
Standard prescription
Standard resistance training prescription, based on international organization's guidelines.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 ("normal") and 29.9 ("overweight")
* Body weight \> 50 Kg
* Without RT experience or with little experience (i.e. less than once a week in the past 12 months).
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women or less than six months after childbirth
* BMI values outside of the specified range
* Body weight \< 50 Kg
* RT experience exceeding the specified cut-off (see above)
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tel Aviv University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Israel Halperin
Principle investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Israel Halperin, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tel Aviv University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv, Israel, Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Westcott WL. Resistance training is medicine: effects of strength training on health. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2012 Jul-Aug;11(4):209-16. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31825dabb8.
Bennie JA, De Cocker K, Smith JJ, Wiesner GH. The epidemiology of muscle-strengthening exercise in Europe: A 28-country comparison including 280,605 adults. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0242220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242220. eCollection 2020.
Phillips SM, Winett RA. Uncomplicated resistance training and health-related outcomes: evidence for a public health mandate. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2010 Jul-Aug;9(4):208-13. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181e7da73.
Iwatsuki T, Abdollahipour R, Psotta R, Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Autonomy facilitates repeated maximum force productions. Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Oct;55:264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
Thompson PD, Arena R, Riebe D, Pescatello LS; American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):215-7. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31829a68cf. No abstract available.
Helms ER, Byrnes RK, Cooke DM, Haischer MH, Carzoli JP, Johnson TK, Cross MR, Cronin JB, Storey AG, Zourdos MC. RPE vs. Percentage 1RM Loading in Periodized Programs Matched for Sets and Repetitions. Front Physiol. 2018 Mar 21;9:247. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00247. eCollection 2018.
Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ISF_Halperin_TAU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.