The Effects of Autonomy and Perceptions on Resistance Training Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT05371587

Last Updated: 2025-03-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

129 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-05-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

120 participants will be randomized into one of two groups that will perform resistance training at a gym three time per week for three months. One group will follow common resistance training guidelines, whereas the other will exercise according to their preferences and perception of effort. The groups will be compared on the following primary outcomes after six and 12 weeks: body composition, physiological and performance tests. The groups will be compared on the following secondary outcomes every two weeks: enjoyment and satisfaction levels. Adherence rates will be measured throughout the intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Develop and test the non-inferiority of a new RT prescription model, entitled The Autonomy and Perceptions Approach to Resistance Training (APART). This approach is simple to follow, individualized, and autonomy supportive. Accordingly, it may assist trainees to overcome some of the limitations of the standard RT prescription approach. Under APART, trainees choose the loads they lift for each exercise according to their preferences, and then complete as many repetitions as required until reaching a specific rating of perceived effort (RPE) value on a 0 (no effort) to 10 (maximal effort) scale (e.g., 8/10). For this non-inferiority randomized controlled trial, the investigators will recruit 120 healthy, sedentary participants, between the ages of 18 and 45, who will be block-randomized by gender and age (18-27, 28-45) to either the APART or the standard groups. Following two baseline-testing sessions and two guided familiarization sessions, participants will independently complete three RT sessions per week for 12 weeks. The following primary outcomes will be assessed after six and 12 weeks: (ⅰ) body composition including fat free mass; (ⅱ) performance measures, including maximal strength and strength endurance; and (ⅲ) physiological measures, including blood profile and hemodynamics. The following secondary outcomes will be measured every two weeks: (ⅳ) psychological measures, including self-efficacy, autonomy, and enjoyment; and (ⅴ) adherence measures, which will be monitored throughout the intervention. If APART will be found to be non-inferior to the standard RT prescription, it can provide a simple and easy to follow alternative to the standard RT prescriptions, which also highlights trainees' preferences and individual abilities. This, in turn, might contribute to future participation and adherence to RT.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Strength Training

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A parallel two-armed, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Participants are allocated using sealed envelops, they receive their arm identification "A" or "B" without information regarding the intervention or group differences. Data will be analyzed using the identification letter without treatment allocation information.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A - Standard resistance training prescription

Standard resistance training prescription: participants will perform three sessions per week comprised of six resistance training exercises - horizontal leg press, lat-pulldown, knee extension, chest press, leg curls and shoulder press. They will perform 3 sets of 10 repetitions using 65% percent of the maximal load that can be lifted once according to a one repetition maximum (1RM) test. Their progression model will be as follows:

Weeks 1-3 65%1RM; Weeks 4-6 70%1RM; 1RM reassessment at week 6; Weeks 7-9 70% of the updated 1RM; Weeks 10-12 75%1RM.

Prior to beginning of the program four visits will take place:

1. Laboratory visit for measuring physiological and anthropometric outcomes (see outcomes section)
2. 1RM testing
3. Endurance and maximal voluntary contraction testing + introduction with the exercise program
4. A second introduction session with the exercise program

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard prescription

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard resistance training prescription, based on international organization's guidelines.

B- Autonomy and perceptions approach to resistance training (APART)

Participants will perform 3 sessions/week of the same exercises. They will perform 3 sets of each exercise, self-select the load they lift in each set and perform repetitions aiming to reach a level of effort of 7-8 on a 0-10 rating of perceived effort scale (RPE) at the end of the set. Their progression model will be as follows: Weeks 1-3 RPE 7/10; Weeks 4-12 RPE 8/10. The selected RPE score of 7 and then 8 out of 10 has been shown to lead to increases in maximal strength in previous research. Prior to beginning of the program four visits will take place:

1. Laboratory visit (similar to standard).
2. 1RM testing where the principles of perceived effort will be introduced.
3. Endurance and maximal voluntary contraction testing + introduction with the exercise program. Participants will practice how to self-select the load they prefer and then perform repetitions leading to the target RPE score.
4. A second introduction session with the exercise program and the RPE construct.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Autonomy and Perceptions Approach to Resistance Training (APART)

Intervention Type OTHER

Alternative resistance training prescription based on trainees' autonomy and perceptions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Autonomy and Perceptions Approach to Resistance Training (APART)

Alternative resistance training prescription based on trainees' autonomy and perceptions.

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard prescription

Standard resistance training prescription, based on international organization's guidelines.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* No health issues preventing resistance training
* Body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 ("normal") and 29.9 ("overweight")
* Body weight \> 50 Kg
* Without RT experience or with little experience (i.e. less than once a week in the past 12 months).

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants who responded positively to any of the health sections and did not provide medical clearance
* Pregnant women or less than six months after childbirth
* BMI values outside of the specified range
* Body weight \< 50 Kg
* RT experience exceeding the specified cut-off (see above)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tel Aviv University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Israel Halperin

Principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Israel Halperin, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tel Aviv University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tel Aviv University

Tel Aviv, Israel, Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Westcott WL. Resistance training is medicine: effects of strength training on health. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2012 Jul-Aug;11(4):209-16. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31825dabb8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22777332 (View on PubMed)

Bennie JA, De Cocker K, Smith JJ, Wiesner GH. The epidemiology of muscle-strengthening exercise in Europe: A 28-country comparison including 280,605 adults. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0242220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242220. eCollection 2020.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33237930 (View on PubMed)

Phillips SM, Winett RA. Uncomplicated resistance training and health-related outcomes: evidence for a public health mandate. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2010 Jul-Aug;9(4):208-13. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181e7da73.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20622538 (View on PubMed)

Iwatsuki T, Abdollahipour R, Psotta R, Lewthwaite R, Wulf G. Autonomy facilitates repeated maximum force productions. Hum Mov Sci. 2017 Oct;55:264-268. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28865313 (View on PubMed)

Thompson PD, Arena R, Riebe D, Pescatello LS; American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's new preparticipation health screening recommendations from ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription, ninth edition. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2013 Jul-Aug;12(4):215-7. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e31829a68cf. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23851406 (View on PubMed)

Helms ER, Byrnes RK, Cooke DM, Haischer MH, Carzoli JP, Johnson TK, Cross MR, Cronin JB, Storey AG, Zourdos MC. RPE vs. Percentage 1RM Loading in Periodized Programs Matched for Sets and Repetitions. Front Physiol. 2018 Mar 21;9:247. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00247. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29628895 (View on PubMed)

Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14(5):377-81.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7154893 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ISF_Halperin_TAU

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Neuro-Athletic Training Effects in Young Adults
NCT07310030 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA