Impact of the Wingate Test on Post-activation Potentiation

NCT ID: NCT06779409

Last Updated: 2025-07-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-14

Study Completion Date

2025-04-25

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this trial is to see if using a maximal effort, short cycling test is better at activating muscles to improve vertical jump height compared to a maximal effort back squat. The study looks to answer three questions:

1. will the Wingate bike test create a different change in counter movement jump height compared to a back squat?
2. What is the best recovery period after each test where the counter movement jump is the highest?
3. What person-specific factors predict success of the Wingate bike test as a activation activity for the counter movement jump? Participants will visit the lab 3 times, once to give informed consent and measure their 1 repetition max (RM) back squat, and twice to perform each intervention and measure vertical jump height.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Participants will be asked to come to the lab for three visits. On the first visit, they will perform informed consent, have anthropometrics taken, and will provide data to assess weightlifting history and factors that may influence the impact of each intervention. They will perform a 1 repetition max (RM) test for the back squat in order to properly dose the back squat potentiation activity. Visits 2 and 3 will be randomized; one will use the back squat (control) and the other will use the Wingate bike test (experimental) to potentiate vertical jump height as measured by the counter movement jump (CMJ). In each session, a warm up will be performed and the baseline CMJ will be performed. The intervention will be performed, either the 30 second Wingate protocol which is a maximal effort cycling test, or the back squat at a high percent of the 1 RM. The CMJ will be reassessed at 3, 6, and 9 minutes after completed each intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Performance Enhancement Muscle Activation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Back squat

Participants will perform 2 sets of 3 repetitions at 85% of their 1 repetition maximum weight for the back squat

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Back squat

Intervention Type OTHER

2 sets of 3 repetitions of a back squat, set to 85% of the 1 repetition maximum weight

Wingate test

Participants will perform the Wingate bike test, with resistance at 7.5% of body weight, with a maximal effort for 30 seconds.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Wingate test

Intervention Type OTHER

30 second maximal effort cycling test, with resistance at 7.5% bodyweight

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Back squat

2 sets of 3 repetitions of a back squat, set to 85% of the 1 repetition maximum weight

Intervention Type OTHER

Wingate test

30 second maximal effort cycling test, with resistance at 7.5% bodyweight

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* healthy adult
* successful completion of the physical activity readiness questionnaire plus
* at least 1 year of back squat weight training experience

Exclusion Criteria

* inability to back squat at least 1.4 times body weight
* females with known pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Erin McCallister, DPT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

LSU Health Shreveport School of Allied Health Professions

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sirieiro P, Nasser I, Dobbs WC, Willardson JM, Miranda H. The Effect of Set Configuration and Load on Post-Activation Potentiation on Vertical Jump in Athletes. Int J Exerc Sci. 2021 Aug 1;14(4):902-911. doi: 10.70252/CCLW6758. eCollection 2021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34567370 (View on PubMed)

Jo E, Judelson DA, Brown LE, Coburn JW, Dabbs NC. Influence of recovery duration after a potentiating stimulus on muscular power in recreationally trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Feb;24(2):343-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc22a4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20072066 (View on PubMed)

Esformes JI, Bampouras TM. Effect of back squat depth on lower-body postactivation potentiation. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Nov;27(11):2997-3000. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828d4465.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23442291 (View on PubMed)

Lowery RP, Duncan NM, Loenneke JP, Sikorski EM, Naimo MA, Brown LE, Wilson FG, Wilson JM. The effects of potentiating stimuli intensity under varying rest periods on vertical jump performance and power. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Dec;26(12):3320-5. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318270fc56.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23007485 (View on PubMed)

McCann MR, Flanagan SP. The effects of exercise selection and rest interval on postactivation potentiation of vertical jump performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1285-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d6867c.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20393352 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00002860

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Training Intrinsic Foot Muscles
NCT03670563 COMPLETED NA