Impact of the Wingate Test on Post-activation Potentiation
NCT ID: NCT06779409
Last Updated: 2025-07-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
35 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-14
2025-04-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. will the Wingate bike test create a different change in counter movement jump height compared to a back squat?
2. What is the best recovery period after each test where the counter movement jump is the highest?
3. What person-specific factors predict success of the Wingate bike test as a activation activity for the counter movement jump? Participants will visit the lab 3 times, once to give informed consent and measure their 1 repetition max (RM) back squat, and twice to perform each intervention and measure vertical jump height.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Supramaximal Walkouts and Back Squat Performance
NCT05988762
Post-activation Performance Enhancement Improves
NCT06825065
Kettlebell Training Measured Across Power and Performance
NCT02731625
Kettlebell Swings and Paraspinal Muscle Function
NCT06069271
Effects of Back Squat Exercise with or Without Blood Flow Restriction in Healthy Adolescent Basketball Athletes
NCT06684093
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Back squat
Participants will perform 2 sets of 3 repetitions at 85% of their 1 repetition maximum weight for the back squat
Back squat
2 sets of 3 repetitions of a back squat, set to 85% of the 1 repetition maximum weight
Wingate test
Participants will perform the Wingate bike test, with resistance at 7.5% of body weight, with a maximal effort for 30 seconds.
Wingate test
30 second maximal effort cycling test, with resistance at 7.5% bodyweight
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Back squat
2 sets of 3 repetitions of a back squat, set to 85% of the 1 repetition maximum weight
Wingate test
30 second maximal effort cycling test, with resistance at 7.5% bodyweight
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* successful completion of the physical activity readiness questionnaire plus
* at least 1 year of back squat weight training experience
Exclusion Criteria
* females with known pregnancy
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Erin McCallister, DPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
LSU Health Shreveport School of Allied Health Professions
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sirieiro P, Nasser I, Dobbs WC, Willardson JM, Miranda H. The Effect of Set Configuration and Load on Post-Activation Potentiation on Vertical Jump in Athletes. Int J Exerc Sci. 2021 Aug 1;14(4):902-911. doi: 10.70252/CCLW6758. eCollection 2021.
Jo E, Judelson DA, Brown LE, Coburn JW, Dabbs NC. Influence of recovery duration after a potentiating stimulus on muscular power in recreationally trained individuals. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 Feb;24(2):343-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181cc22a4.
Esformes JI, Bampouras TM. Effect of back squat depth on lower-body postactivation potentiation. J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Nov;27(11):2997-3000. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31828d4465.
Lowery RP, Duncan NM, Loenneke JP, Sikorski EM, Naimo MA, Brown LE, Wilson FG, Wilson JM. The effects of potentiating stimuli intensity under varying rest periods on vertical jump performance and power. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Dec;26(12):3320-5. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318270fc56.
McCann MR, Flanagan SP. The effects of exercise selection and rest interval on postactivation potentiation of vertical jump performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1285-91. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d6867c.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00002860
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.