Individual Response to Different Volumes of Resistance Training
NCT ID: NCT02179307
Last Updated: 2015-11-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-08-31
2015-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will include 25 women and 25 men and will consist of a 12-week resistance training protocol. Each study participant will act as their own control, performing both the low- (1-set) and the moderate-volume (3-sets) protocol, allocated to either the dominant or non-dominant leg, in a stratified and randomized fashion.
Primary outcome measures are thigh muscle cross section area and unilateral knee extension strength. Additionally, muscle fiber type composition will be evaluated as well as additional parameters of muscular function.
The primary hypothesis is that low-volume protocols will be beneficial for individuals with glycolytic muscle phenotypes, whereas the opposite will be true for individuals with more aerobic phenotypes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Adults
NCT06107855
Muscle Typology and Strength Training Adaptations
NCT05108181
Effects of Different Volumes of Resistance Training
NCT06449300
Upper Versus Lower Limb Responses to Higher Versus Lower Load Resistance Training in Young Men
NCT03993483
The Role of Mechanical Stress and Muscle Fatigue in Strength Gains
NCT01216774
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm label 1-Set, 3-Set
12-week progressive strength training protocol of different volumes
12-week progressive strength training protocol
Every study participant will complete 12 weeks of progressive strength training with one leg performing 1-set per exercise per session and the contralateral leg performing 3-sets per exercise per session. Allocation of dominant/non-dominant leg to either 1- or 3-set protocol will be done in a stratified, randomized fashion (stratified with regard to sex and baseline strength).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
12-week progressive strength training protocol
Every study participant will complete 12 weeks of progressive strength training with one leg performing 1-set per exercise per session and the contralateral leg performing 3-sets per exercise per session. Allocation of dominant/non-dominant leg to either 1- or 3-set protocol will be done in a stratified, randomized fashion (stratified with regard to sex and baseline strength).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non-smoking
* Able to tolerate resistance exercise training
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosed mental health disorder
* Intolerance to local anesthetic
* No experience with exercise training
* Performing regular resistance training (more than 1 session per week during last 12 months)
* Impaired strength/ neuromuscular function due to previous injury
* Recurrent pain in lower back, knee or shoulders
* Taking prescribed medication that may affect outcome of training intervention
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sykehuset Innlandet HF
OTHER
Revmatismesykehuset AS
OTHER
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stian Ellefsen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lillehammer University College
Lillehammer, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Trainsome 2014#002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.