Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Adults

NCT ID: NCT06107855

Last Updated: 2023-10-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-08-01

Study Completion Date

2023-03-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aims of this study were to:

1. Compare the effects of low-dose Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training on untrained healthy adults' quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength.
2. Qualitatively explore perceptions of Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Quality of Life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Maximal-intent Resistance Training

The MI group was instructed and encouraged to deliberately commit to exerting maximal effort and force during the concentric phase of the leg press with the intention of achieving the greatest velocity possible.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Leg Press Resistance Training Machine

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants used said unilateral leg press at 60% one-repetition max for either 3 sets x 5 reps, or 5 sets x 5 reps, at either maximal- or controlled-tempo-intent.

Controlled-tempo Resistance Training

While the CT group followed the metronome for both eccentric and concentric phases.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Leg Press Resistance Training Machine

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants used said unilateral leg press at 60% one-repetition max for either 3 sets x 5 reps, or 5 sets x 5 reps, at either maximal- or controlled-tempo-intent.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Leg Press Resistance Training Machine

Participants used said unilateral leg press at 60% one-repetition max for either 3 sets x 5 reps, or 5 sets x 5 reps, at either maximal- or controlled-tempo-intent.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants were eligible if they were between 30-60 years old
* Uninjured
* Had no cardiovascular or neuromuscular conditions
* Had not participated in lower-limb RT in the previous six months.

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants were excluded if they had either taken part in any lower-limb RT in the last six months
* Had underlying health condition(s) that prevented them from participating in RT
* Regularly met or exceeded the UK recommended PA guideline of 150-minutes of moderate to intense PA per week.
Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

59 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northumbria University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gill Barry, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Northumbria University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nortuhmbria University

Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pearson LT, Behm DG, Goodall S, Mason R, Stuart S, Barry G. Effects of maximal-versus submaximal-intent resistance training on functional capacity and strength in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 16;14(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00526-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35842655 (View on PubMed)

Pearson LT, Fox KT, Keenan A, Behm DG, Stuart S, Goodall S, Barry G. Comparison of low-dose maximal-intent versus controlled-tempo resistance training on quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength in untrained healthy adults: a comparative effectiveness study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Mar 23;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00847-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38521946 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

45459

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Quantification of Internal Training Load
NCT06164249 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA