Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Adults
NCT ID: NCT06107855
Last Updated: 2023-10-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-01
2023-03-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Compare the effects of low-dose Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training on untrained healthy adults' quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength.
2. Qualitatively explore perceptions of Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Individual Response to Different Volumes of Resistance Training
NCT02179307
The Effect of Peak Force At Long and Short Muscle Lengths and the Impact on Muscle Growth and Strength
NCT06666127
Impact of Strength and Power Training on Golf Performance and Swing Biomechanics
NCT04004468
Effects of Resistance Training in Untrained Older Adults
NCT02253615
Upper Versus Lower Limb Responses to Higher Versus Lower Load Resistance Training in Young Men
NCT03993483
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Maximal-intent Resistance Training
The MI group was instructed and encouraged to deliberately commit to exerting maximal effort and force during the concentric phase of the leg press with the intention of achieving the greatest velocity possible.
Leg Press Resistance Training Machine
Participants used said unilateral leg press at 60% one-repetition max for either 3 sets x 5 reps, or 5 sets x 5 reps, at either maximal- or controlled-tempo-intent.
Controlled-tempo Resistance Training
While the CT group followed the metronome for both eccentric and concentric phases.
Leg Press Resistance Training Machine
Participants used said unilateral leg press at 60% one-repetition max for either 3 sets x 5 reps, or 5 sets x 5 reps, at either maximal- or controlled-tempo-intent.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Leg Press Resistance Training Machine
Participants used said unilateral leg press at 60% one-repetition max for either 3 sets x 5 reps, or 5 sets x 5 reps, at either maximal- or controlled-tempo-intent.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Uninjured
* Had no cardiovascular or neuromuscular conditions
* Had not participated in lower-limb RT in the previous six months.
Exclusion Criteria
* Had underlying health condition(s) that prevented them from participating in RT
* Regularly met or exceeded the UK recommended PA guideline of 150-minutes of moderate to intense PA per week.
30 Years
59 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northumbria University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gill Barry, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northumbria University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nortuhmbria University
Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pearson LT, Behm DG, Goodall S, Mason R, Stuart S, Barry G. Effects of maximal-versus submaximal-intent resistance training on functional capacity and strength in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 16;14(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00526-x.
Pearson LT, Fox KT, Keenan A, Behm DG, Stuart S, Goodall S, Barry G. Comparison of low-dose maximal-intent versus controlled-tempo resistance training on quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength in untrained healthy adults: a comparative effectiveness study. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Mar 23;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00847-z.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
45459
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.