Twin Block, Pain Medications and Third Molar Extractions

NCT ID: NCT04880707

Last Updated: 2025-10-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-11

Study Completion Date

2026-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Each year, over 3.5 million, mostly, healthy young adults, have their third molar teeth ('wisdom teeth') removed under sedation and are often given opioid prescriptions for managing their pain. Wisdom molar removal is one of the most common reasons for opioid prescriptions to be given to adolescents. There is a national thrust to reduce both the dose and the duration of such opioid prescriptions because even short-term opioid exposures increase risk for narcotic addiction and misuse. Non-opioid options to manage pain will still allow for sufficient pain control without risking addiction, and hence, a fundamental component of our response to combat the current national opioid crisis.

The investigators are going to study a promising option- the Twin Block dental anesthetic injection. The Twin block involves injecting the standard dental numbing medication in a way that 'numbs' the 'jaw-clencher' muscles on the side of the face. The investigators found that the Twin block relieved jaw pain stemming from these muscles, in a quick and sustained manner, even in patients whose pain following wisdom tooth removal primarily came from 'taut' and tender jaw-clencher muscles. However, what is not known is- how often do patients who have their wisdom teeth removed under sedation, end up in significant pain from taut and tender jaw-clencher muscles? Will using the twin block effectively reduce pain in such patients? In this pilot study, the investigators will examine wisdom molar extraction patients one day after their procedure. Those with significant pain (pain rated ≥ 5 on a 0-10 scale) in their jaw-clencher muscles, will get either the Twin block injection or a placebo. The investigators will track both 1) pain before and after the injection, and 2) pain medication usage over a 7-day period to see if both pain and opioid dosage come down with the Twin block. This study can support a simple, safe and inexpensive means to reduce pain after a common procedure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Annually, over 3.5 million predominantly young and healthy individuals undergo outpatient third molar tooth extractions and routinely receive postoperative opioid prescription (Moore, Nahouraii et al. 2006). This procedure is among the most prevalent instances of opioid prescriptions to adolescents and is the subject of a national debate, given the CDC's mandate for minimizing the number and duration of opioid prescriptions (Volkow, McLellan et al. 2011, Dowell, Haegerich et al. 2016, Moore, Dionne et al. 2016). Targeting such a prevalent practice by supplementing postoperative analgesia with non-opioid options as well as optimizing and tracking opioid usage will significantly reduce prescription opioid use/misuse. The Twin Block is a local anesthetic nerve block that eases muscle pain emanating from the jaw muscles and has been anecdotally shown to be effective in relieving post-operative pain in patients who developed muscle pain following third molar extractions. However, the incidence of acute muscle pain following third molar extractions is not well established. Accordingly, the aims of this study are two-fold:

A. Objectives This study has 2 objectives: 1) To estimate the incidence of acute muscle pain involving the temporalis and masseter muscles (the jaw closer muscles that are commonly implicated in resulting in jaw muscle pain), following third molar extractions and 2) Conduct a double-blind prospective study to compare the efficacy of Twin Block in relieving postextraction pain in those patients determined to experience muscle pain following the procedure B. Hypotheses / Research Question(s) Hypothesis 1: The incidence of post-third molar extraction muscle pain is at least 40% Hypothesis 2: Twin block reduces post-extraction muscle pain by 50% 1.2 Research Significance The twin block is a simple and effective local anesthetic nerve block for 'numbing' the innervation to the masseter and temporalis muscles, two key jaw clencher muscles, with emerging data corroborating efficacy in the diagnosis and management of both acute and chronic myogenous orofacial pain (Quek, Young et al. 2014, Ananthan et al. 2017). 1.3 Research Design and Methods The study is designed as a prospective evaluation of patients undergoing third molar extractions under intravenous sedation to identify those developing post-extraction muscle pain on the day following the procedure. Subsequently, such patients will be prospectively randomized to receive the Twin block to deliver either the dental local anesthetic or saline as a placebo. Post-injection muscle pain will be evaluated 15 minutes following the administration of the injection. All patients will be provided similar directions and prescriptions for pain management. All patients will be contacted to document/report their daily pain medications and queried one week after the extraction/s for their overall pain experience and any adverse effects from the injection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Triple blind, randomized prospective pilot study comparing post wisdom molar extraction pain comparing placebo or Twin block local anesthetic nerve block injection
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
The patient, Twin block administrator and assessor assessing jaw muscle pain will all be unaware of whether the patient received sterile saline (placebo) or local anesthetic in the Twin Block injection.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Twin Block with Local Anesthetic

Following lower third molar extraction under intravenous sedation, the patient randomized to this arm with receive the Twin block local anesthetic nerve block using the standard dental local anesthetic, i.e,. 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, on the day after extraction, if the patient has pain greater than or equal to 5 on 10 in their jaw-closer muscles (Numerical Pain rating scale).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Twin block local anesthetic nerve block using standard dental anesthetic

Intervention Type DRUG

2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine is the standard dental local anesthetic in universal use. This drug will be administered as the Twin block local anesthetic nerve block targeting the branches of the mandibular nerve supplying the temporalis and masseter muscles.

Twin Block with sterile normal saline

Following lower third molar extraction under intravenous sedation, the patient randomized to this arm with receive the Twin block using sterile normal saline, on the day after extraction, if the patient has pain greater than or equal to 5 on 10 in their jaw-closer muscles (Numerical Pain rating scale).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Twin block with placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Instead of the standard dental anesthetic, sterile normal saline will be delivered using the Twin block injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Twin block local anesthetic nerve block using standard dental anesthetic

2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine is the standard dental local anesthetic in universal use. This drug will be administered as the Twin block local anesthetic nerve block targeting the branches of the mandibular nerve supplying the temporalis and masseter muscles.

Intervention Type DRUG

Twin block with placebo

Instead of the standard dental anesthetic, sterile normal saline will be delivered using the Twin block injection

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients requiring extraction/s of at least 1 lower wisdom (third) molar that is partially/fully 'impacted', under intravenous sedation, are eligible to participate in this study so long as they

1. are older than 18 years of age,
2. are healthy,
3. have no cognitive/intellectual disability,
4. have no past/recent pain or reduced range of motion in their jaw joint/ muscle complex, no trauma or surgery in their jaw region.
5. have an electronic device such as a smart phone or a tablet/ computer with internet connection.
6. are willing to participate in the study and not be excluded by the following criteria below.

Exclusion Criteria

* Any patients, even if satisfying the criteria above, may not take part if they have any of the following:

1. Compromised ability to guard their self-interest, for e.g., prisoners, children, pregnant women, patients with intellectual/cognitive disability are not enrolled in the study.
2. Those patients who present with infection/inflammation involving the third molars slated for extractions, on the day of their procedure, may not take part in the study.
3. In addition, those who have had opioid pain medication/s in the past to address short-term or long-standing pain, or those who are on long term prescription of anti-inflammatory pain medication, are unable to participate.
4. Those with long standing pain of the jaw joint or muscles.
5. Finally, those patients who are allergic to/unable to tolerate either the dental local anesthetic or its components, opioids, acetaminophen ('Tylenol') or ibuprofen ('Motrin' or 'Advil') also may not take part in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

New Jersey Health Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Gayathri Subramanian

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gayathri Subramanian, PhD, DMD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark NJ

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rutgers School of Dental Medicine

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Gayathri Subramanian, PhD, DMD

Role: CONTACT

973 972 3418

Brahmleen Kaur, DMD

Role: CONTACT

973 972 3126

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Gayathri Subramanian, PhD, DMD

Role: primary

973-972-3418

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Quek S, Young A, Subramanian G. The twin block: a simple technique to block both the masseteric and the anterior deep temporal nerves with one anesthetic injection. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014 Sep;118(3):e65-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.01.227. Epub 2014 Feb 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24703404 (View on PubMed)

Quek SYP, Gomes-Zagury J, Subramanian G. Twin Block in Myogenous Orofacial Pain: Applied Anatomy, Technique Update, and Safety. Anesth Prog. 2020 Jun 1;67(2):103-106. doi: 10.2344/anpr-67-01-03.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32633773 (View on PubMed)

Kanti V, Ananthan S, Subramanian G, Quek SYP. Efficacy of the twin block, a peripheral nerve block for the management of chronic masticatory myofascial pain: A case series. Quintessence Int. 2017 Oct 6:725-729. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a39094. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28990015 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro2020002007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain Control Following Third Molar Surgery
NCT06514222 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1