Bupivacaine Supplementation For Postoperative Pain Control In Surgical Removal Of Mandibular Third Molars

NCT ID: NCT02353676

Last Updated: 2015-02-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Control of postoperative pain is a foremost goal in achieving a satisfactory postoperative recovery. Surgical removal of lower third molars is accompanied by postoperative pain that is at its peak in the first 12 hours. Our study evaluates if the use of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride for the surgical removal of lower third molars with a postoperative 0.5% bupivacaine supplementation would result in lesser postoperative pain and a decrease in ingestion of oral analgesics to control the pain when compared to a placebo.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study intends to enroll 100 patients \[ASA 1\] with bilateral symmetrical impacted mandibular third molars requiring surgical removal under local anesthesia. 2% Lidocaine hydrochloride with epinephrine bitartrate 1: 80000 in 3ml quantity will be utilized to achieve local anesthesia at the surgical site on both quadrants. Additional supplementation postoperative at the surgical site will be provided with either 1.5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:80000 epinephrine solution or saline based on a split mouth randomized study design using a color and number coded envelop. All procedures will be performed by a single surgeon using a similar technique, under identical conditions at one month apart intervals. Pain scores will be assessed by the patient based on a 10cm Visual Analog Scale at intervals of 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours. The duration of soft tissue anesthesia postoperatively will be recorded by the patient. The number of analgesics ingested over 120 hours will be recorded by the patient. Results will be evaluated statistically by the Wilcoxon test and two tailed test to determine the ratio. Statistical significance will be considered at p \< 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia, Local

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BUPIVACAINE GROUP

1.5 ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine solution to be injected into the operative site postoperatively.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

1.5 ml of 0.55 bupivacaine solution to be used as postoperative anesthetic agent for prolonged analgesia

PLACEBO GROUP

1.5 ml of saline solution to be injected into the opposite site postoperatively.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

SALINE

Intervention Type OTHER

1.5 ml of placebo (saline solution) to be injected into the opposite site postoperatively.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bupivacaine

1.5 ml of 0.55 bupivacaine solution to be used as postoperative anesthetic agent for prolonged analgesia

Intervention Type DRUG

SALINE

1.5 ml of placebo (saline solution) to be injected into the opposite site postoperatively.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ANAWIN

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* healthy ASA \[American Society of Anaesthesiologists\] class 1 patients with mandibular bilateral, symmetrical, impacted third molars indicated for extraction.

Exclusion Criteria

* unilateral impacted and bilateral asymmetrical impacted molars;
* those who misused alcohol, had chronic pain,
* those who took narcotic drugs, beta-blockers, or any analgesic drug within 24 hours before the operation
* those with known hypersensitivity to amide types of local anesthetics.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cosmozone Dental Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

pavan MANOHAR PATIL

DIRECTOR

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COSMOZONE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Jaw Muscle Pain Post Wisdom Molar Surgery
NCT07094542 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2
Pain Control Following Third Molar Surgery
NCT06514222 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1
Hyaluronidase Enzymes and Local Anesthesia
NCT06980363 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE1