Postoperative Analgesia Following Wisdom Teeth Removal: Ropivacaine Versus Placebo

NCT ID: NCT01541059

Last Updated: 2025-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-08-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the superiority of local analgesia with ropivacaine versus placebo on postoperative pain during the first 24 hours following bilateral surgery of all four third molars under general anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The secondary objectives of this study are to compare regional anesthesia by ropivacaine versus placebo for the bilateral resection of all four third molars under general anesthesia, in terms of:

A. intraoperative use of propofol and remifentanil B. postoperative pain (EVN) at different time points C. in-hospital analgesic consumption D. time to first rescue analgesic request E. time spent in the post interventional treatment room F. length of hospital stay G. side effects H. analgesic consumption at home I. analgesic consumption (total) J. patient satisfaction K. Chronic pain after surgery

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Third Molar Extraction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Patients in this arm will have standard anesthesia with the injection of placebo solution into the vestibular of each tooth to be extracted

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection of saline solution into the vestibular capsule of each tooth to be extracted.

Ropivacaine

Patients in this arm will have general anesthesia with injection of ropivacaine into the vestibular next to each tooth to be extracted.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivacaine injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Ropivacaine is injected into the vestibular capsule of each tooth to be extracted.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placebo injection

Injection of saline solution into the vestibular capsule of each tooth to be extracted.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ropivacaine injection

Ropivacaine is injected into the vestibular capsule of each tooth to be extracted.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Standard intervention Saline solution Experimental intervention.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patient must have given his/her informed and signed consent
* The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
* The patient is available for 3 months of follow-up
* American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score of 1, 2 or 3
* Patient programmed for surgical removal of all 4 wisdom teeth, excluding all other teeth, under general anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria

* The patient is participating in another study
* The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
* The patient is over 18 years old and under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
* The patient (or legal representative)refuses to sign the consent
* It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
* The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
* Ineffective contraceptive
* Addiction or chronic pain treated with morphine
* Contra-indication for regional anesthesia (eg congenital or acquired coagulopathy, infection, allergy)
* Contra-indication to local anesthetics, general anesthetics and analgesics used in the protocol.
* Difficult cooperation, psychiatric disorders that could interfere with assessments
* Hypersensitivity to ropivacaine or other local anesthetics with amide links
* Contra-indication for the use of NaCl 0.9%: all states of sodium and water retention (especially heart failure, edema and ascites syndrome associated with cirrhosis)
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jacques Ripart, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

Nîmes, Gard, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ghezal H, Bouvet S, Kabani S, Ripart J, Cuvillon P. Ropivacaine versus placebo on postoperative analgesia and chronic pain following third molar extraction: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Apr;121(2):113-117. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31326593 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-004972-13

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

LOCAL/2011/JR/HG-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Reducing Pain From Wisdom Molar Extractions
NCT05335070 RECRUITING PHASE2
Pain Control Following Third Molar Surgery
NCT06514222 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1