Pain Control Following Third Molar Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06514222

Last Updated: 2024-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2024-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this study, the investigators recruited patients undergoing surgical removal of impacted third molar teeth. Participants will be randomly divided into two groups Group 1: The patient will receive 400mg of ibuprofen plus 1000mg of Paracetamol simultaneously every 8 hours for two days.

Group 2- The patient will receive 400mg ibuprofen and 1000mg Paracetamol at 4 hours in intervals for two days. With a total of 3 doses of ibuprofen and 3 doses of paracetamol per day Then, pain control will be assessed using various primary and secondary outcome scales.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar is one of the most common procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Ten million third molars are extracted from approximately 5 million people in the United States each year. Research suggests that wisdom tooth removal has an immediate negative impact on patients' working and social lives: in one study, patients took an average of 1.6 days off work, with over one-third of patients stating that the surgery had affected their performance at work. Postoperative complications may include swelling, bruising, and limited mouth opening, along with difficulty with eating, which can be a major concern to patients and has not been appreciated by healthcare professionals in the past. However, patients are often most concerned about postoperative pain, which may be severe. Approximately one in two patients will experience pain despite analgesic therapy, even one week after surgery. The inflammatory response to surgical trauma is associated with edema, discomfort, dehiscence, and trismus, and these factors may affect the patient's everyday life. The control of these symptoms is frequently based on pharmacological manipulation of local and systemic pain and inflammation mediators. Combining two analgesic agents with distinct mechanisms or sites of action, such as combining a peripherally acting analgesic with a centrally acting analgesic, has been advocated for many years. A common example is the analgesic formulation containing acetaminophen combined with the opioid hydrocodone or paracetamol with ibuprofen. The pain control of single showed that the maximum effect is recorded in the first 2 to 3 hours. Combining two agents tends to increase the effect for 6 to 8 hours. However, as both medication actions commence simultaneously in the latter combination, they are likely to fade in the same way. This may make the patient likely to overdose on such medicine to ensure the continuity of pain relief. This research aims to test the combination of classical pain medication but in a novel alternate way to minimize the dosage and avoid the risk of side effects and toxicity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Operative Pain Impacted Third Molar Tooth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A single-center, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The evaluators responsible for data collection and analyses are blinded to the analgesic medication regime used by the patients

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

study

patient will receive 400mg ibuprofen and 1000mg Paracetamol at 4 hours in intervals for two days. With a total of 3 doses of ibuprofen and 3 doses of paracetamol per day

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Paracetamol and Ibuprofen. The combination of the Paracetamol and Ibuprofen will be given together every 8 hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 1- The patient will receive 400mg ibuprofen plus 1000mg Paracetamol simultaneously every 8 hours for two days.

Control

The patient will receive 400mg of ibuprofen plus 1000mg of Paracetamol simultaneously every 8 hours for two days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Paracetamol and Ibuprofen. The combination of the Paracetamol and Ibuprofen will be given alternatively every four hours

Intervention Type DRUG

Group 2- The patient will receive 400mg ibuprofen and 1000mg Paracetamol at 4 hours in intervals for two days. With a total of 3 doses of ibuprofen and 3 doses of paracetamol per day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Paracetamol and Ibuprofen. The combination of the Paracetamol and Ibuprofen will be given together every 8 hours

Group 1- The patient will receive 400mg ibuprofen plus 1000mg Paracetamol simultaneously every 8 hours for two days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Paracetamol and Ibuprofen. The combination of the Paracetamol and Ibuprofen will be given alternatively every four hours

Group 2- The patient will receive 400mg ibuprofen and 1000mg Paracetamol at 4 hours in intervals for two days. With a total of 3 doses of ibuprofen and 3 doses of paracetamol per day

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥18 years,
2. Need for surgical extraction of at least one fully or partially impacted lower third molar with a degree of difficulty of 5 points or more on the Pedersen scale,
3. ASA I-II status according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists, and
4. No allergy to the drugs under study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Pregnancy
2. Breastfeeding
3. ASA III or above
4. Consumption of antibiotics in the week before surgery; and
5. Clinical evidence of acute infection on the day of surgical intervention
6. Radiographic evidence of peri-radicular pathology in impacted teeth requiring extraction
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sharjah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kamis Gaballah

Program Director for MDS-Oral Surgery, Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kamis Gaballah, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Sharjah

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University dental Hospital

Sharjah city, , United Arab Emirates

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Arab Emirates

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Friedman JW. The prophylactic extraction of third molars: a public health hazard. Am J Public Health. 2007 Sep;97(9):1554-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.100271. Epub 2007 Jul 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17666691 (View on PubMed)

Colorado-Bonnin M, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Quality of life following lower third molar removal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006 Apr;35(4):343-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.08.008. Epub 2005 Nov 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16280233 (View on PubMed)

Ogden GR, Bissias E, Ruta DA, Ogston S. Quality of life following third molar removal: a patient versus professional perspective. Br Dent J. 1998 Oct 24;185(8):407-10. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809827.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9828502 (View on PubMed)

Savin J, Ogden GR. Third molar surgery--a preliminary report on aspects affecting quality of life in the early postoperative period. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Aug;35(4):246-53. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(97)90042-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9291262 (View on PubMed)

Kim K, Brar P, Jakubowski J, Kaltman S, Lopez E. The use of corticosteroids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medication for the management of pain and inflammation after third molar surgery: a review of the literature. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 May;107(5):630-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.11.005. Epub 2009 Jan 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19157919 (View on PubMed)

Mehra P, Reebye U, Nadershah M, Cottrell D. Efficacy of anti-inflammatory drugs in third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;42(7):835-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.02.017. Epub 2013 Mar 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23535007 (View on PubMed)

Hersh EV, Pinto A, Moore PA. Adverse drug interactions involving common prescription and over-the-counter analgesic agents. Clin Ther. 2007;29 Suppl:2477-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.003.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18164916 (View on PubMed)

Bailey E, Worthington H, Coulthard P. Ibuprofen and/or paracetamol (acetaminophen) for pain relief after surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth, a Cochrane systematic review. Br Dent J. 2014 Apr;216(8):451-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.330.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24762895 (View on PubMed)

Gaballah K, Eldohaji T, Tannir ME, Shaban R, Habib R, Ali K. Pain control following impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a comparison of the effectiveness of two different protocols. Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 3;15(1):11519. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89744-0.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40181005 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC-23-03-25-01-S

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.