Betamethasone and Complications of Lower Third Molar Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07297264

Last Updated: 2025-12-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-03

Study Completion Date

2023-03-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pain, swelling, and trismus are common sequalae of surgical removal of impacted third molars. The aim of this study is to evaluate effect of local administration of betamethasone, into the pterygomandibular space, on these sequalae

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A prospective, single center, double-blind, randomized controlled design study was conducted between January 2022 and February 2023, in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Rizgary teaching hospital, Erbil, Iraq. The participants were patients presented for the surgical removal of bilateral symmetrical impacted lower third molars. To achieve 95% power, a sample size of 40 patients with bilateral impacted third molars was required.

The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the institutional board and was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (1964) and its seventh amendment (2013) and to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) (Figurec1). The objectives of the study, as well as the risks and benefits were explained to the patients and those who agreed to participate have signed a consent form.

The inclusion criteria of the study were: individuals of both genders aging between 18 and 35 years, classified as ASA I according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists, and who have symmetrical bilateral impacted mandibular third molar detected by a panoramic radiograph. Impacted teeth categorized as mesiaoangular (Winter classification) and class II position B (Pell and Gregory classification) were included. The patients had no infection, pain, trismus, and swelling at the time of surgery.

Patients who are smokers, with pericoronitis, active infection, systemic disorders, on long term steroids, pregnant and lactating women were excluded. Patients were also precluded if they had taken analgesics 24 hours before- and antibiotics one week before the surgery, and if the surgical procedure exceeded 30 minutes or if more than three cartridges of local anaesthesia were used during the procedure.

By implementing the split mouth model, each participant underwent two surgical procedures, with an interval of at least 4 weeks between them. Prior to the first procedure, randomization of the first side to be operated (right or left) was performed using the "heads or tails" technique using a coin, where the head represented the right side and tails the left side.

The study group (group I) received 1 ml (6 mg) of betamethasone (CKOÇAK FARMA, Turkey) injection to the pterygomandibular space. Each ml contains 3.0 mg betamethasone acetate and 3.0 mg betamethasone sodium phosphate. The control group (group II) received a corresponding volume of normal saline injected into the pterygomandibular space. To ensure blinding of the study, the solution was injected by a third person, who is not directly involved in the surgery nor in the postoperative visits.

Impacted mandibular third molar surgery was performed under local anesthesia, using 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with 1:80,000 concentration of adrenaline. Inferior alveolar nerve, lingual and buccal nerve block technique were performed. After profound anesthesia was achieved, the betamethasone, or the sham solution, was injected into the pterygomandibular space using 3 ml disposable plastic syringe and gauge 25 hypodermic needle. A standard Ward's incision was designed and the mucoperiosteal fap was reflected to expose the surgical site. A lingual flap was reflected, only when deemed to be necessary. Bone guttering was made using round No.8 and straight fissure carbide bur (no. 703) bur, under copious saline irrigation. The tooth was sectioned or removed as whole. It was then luxated and delivered using elevators and forceps. The socket was thoroughly irrigated with normal saline solution done, after the rough bone margins were trimmed and finally the wound was closed with 3-0 Vicryl suture. The duration of surgery was measured from the time of incision to placement of the last suture.

The patient was given the usual postoperative instructions, including ice pack application to the operated side for 20 minutes, with 20-minute intervals between applications, for the first day. The patient was advised to consume cold liquid diet in the first day, and soft diet for the next 5 days. In addition, twice daily mouth wash with chlorhexidine 0.12% for 5 days, starting the day after surgery. Patients were given three days course of broad-spectrum antibiotic (amoxicillin 500 mg every eight hours or clindamycin 300 mg every eight hours if a penicillin allergy existed) and paracetamol 1g as a rescue analgesic.

The Facial swelling and the degree of trismus was recorded by the same operator, preoperatively and on the first, third, and seventh postoperative days. The pain was recorded by the patient, at 8:00 am, using visual analogue scale (VAS) at 1-5 postoperative days. . The patients rated pain on a 10-cm VAS, from no pain (0) to the most severe pain (10). Number of analgesic tablets consumed by the patients ,during the first five postoperative days, was also calculated. Flexible tape was used for measuring the following facial distances: gonion-lip commissure, gonion-external canthus of the eye, tragus-lip commissure, tragus-soft tissue pogonion. The sum of the preoperative measurements was considered as a baseline for the side of the face being assessed. Subtracting the preoperative measurement from the postoperative one indicated the amount of facial swelling. The degree of trismus was assessed by measuring the distance between the incisal edges of the upper and lower central incisors, on maximum mouth opening, using a digital vernier Statistical analyses was performed using the statistical package SPSS software 25.0. Comparisons between the groups was carried out using an independent t test. The significance level was set at P \< 0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Morbidity Third Molars Extraction Steroid Injection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

betamethasone treated side

Betamethasone was administered into the pterygomandibular space immediately before surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Betamethasone

Intervention Type DRUG

The study group (group I) received 1 ml (6 mg) of betamethasone (CKOÇAK FARMA, Turkey) injection to the pterygomandibular space. Each ml contains 3.0 mg betamethasone acetate and 3.0 mg betamethasone sodium phosphate

Control side

normal saline was administered into the pterygomandibular space immediately before surgery

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

normal saline

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Betamethasone

The study group (group I) received 1 ml (6 mg) of betamethasone (CKOÇAK FARMA, Turkey) injection to the pterygomandibular space. Each ml contains 3.0 mg betamethasone acetate and 3.0 mg betamethasone sodium phosphate

Intervention Type DRUG

normal saline

normal saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Betamethasone injection ino the pterygomandibular space

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* healthy
* no infection
* no pain
* no limitation of mouth opening
* symmetrical bilateral impacted third molars (Mesioangular, CLASS II, Position B

Exclusion Criteria

* Infection
* systemic disease
* smokers
* operation time exceeding 30 minutes
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shehab Ahmed Hamad

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Shehab Ahmed Hamad

Assisstan professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shehab Hamad, FFDRCSI

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kurdistan Higher Council of Medical Specialties

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shehab Ahmed Hamad

Erbil, , Iraq

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Iraq

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Betamethasone in MTM

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id