Effect of Innovative Thinking Development Program on Some Approaches of Nursing Students
NCT ID: NCT04743648
Last Updated: 2021-04-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
164 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-15
2021-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis:
H0: The innovative approaches, critical thinking tendencies and competence perceptions of nursing students included in ITDP do not change.
H1: Individual innovativeness, critical thinking disposition and self-efficacy scale scores of nursing students in the experimental group will change after ITDP.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Creative Thinking Problem Solving and Communication Skills
NCT04940728
7E Model in Nursing Education
NCT06689306
Creative Drama-Based Stress Management Program on Stress, Coping, and Emotional Intelligence
NCT07202182
The Effect of "Persons With Disability Friendly Nursing Education Program"
NCT05257252
Developing Nursing Students' Intercultural Sensitivity Levels
NCT05941026
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this study, there is a non-randomized experimental group and two control groups (total 164 nursing students). Experimental and control groups were determined by lots. Data collected through online forms.
The developed educational program was implemented to students in the experimental group through an online platform. The trainings lasted 6 weeks and different applications were made with themes appropriate to the content. In addition, a whatsapp group was opened and posts about innovation thinking exercises were made.
The research data were collected a 'Personal Information Form', 'Individual Innovativeness Scale', 'Marmara Critical Thinking Trends Scale' and 'Self-Efficacy Scale' in pre test and post tests.The efficiency of the program was determined by applying an 'Success Test' to the experimental group.
Personal Information Form: The twenty-one question 'Personal Information Form' consists of sociodemographic questions and questions related to innovation.
Individual Innovation Scale (IIS): The scale was developed in 1977. The scale was adapted to Turkish in 2014. The scale adapted to nursing is 5-point Likert type. It consists of three sub-dimensions and a total of 18 questions. These sub dimensions are; resistance to change sub-dimension, opinion leadership sub-dimension and risk-taking sub-dimension. According to the score obtained from the scale; Scores of 57 and below are classified as 'traditionalist', those who score between 58-65 as 'skeptical', those who score between 66 and 74 as 'questioning', those who score between 75 and 82 as 'pioneer', and those who score 82 and above as 'innovative'. Scale Cronbach Alpha value is 0.82. The Cronbach Alpha value of the scale for this study is 0.94.
Marmara Critical Thinking Trends Scale (MCTTS): The scale was developed in 2018. The scale consists of 28 items and 6 sub-dimensions. The scale is in 5-point Likert type. Scale sub-dimensions; reasoning, reaching judgment, searching for evidence, searching for truth, open-mindedness and systematicity. The high score obtained from each sub-dimension of the scale indicates that the individual has the feature in the relevant sub-dimension. Scale Cronbach Alpha value is 0.91. The Cronbach Alpha value of the scale for this study is 0.93.
Self-Efficacy Scale (SES):The scale was developed in 1983.The scale was adapted to Turkish in 1999. It is a 5-point Likert type consisting of 23 items. The 4 sub-dimensions of the scale are starting behavior, maintaining behavior, completing behavior and struggling with obstacles. The high total score obtained from the scale indicates that the general efficacy perception is high, and the low general efficacy perception is low. Scale Cronbach Alpha value is 0.81. The Cronbach Alpha value of the scale for this study is 0.88.
Evaluation of Data SPSS 23.0 statistical package program was used for statistical analysis and evaluation of the data. Whether the data showed normal distribution was checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Independent samples t test and Mann Whitney U test were used to compare data between groups according to normality test. Paired samples t test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare the pre-test and post-test values within the group. The Chi-square test and two ratio tests were used to analyze categorical data. Significance level was taken as p \<0.05.
Information:
No budget was received from any institution for the research. Ethics committee approval was obtained and verbal consent was obtained from the participants.
There is no conflict of interest.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention Group
After determining the experimental and control groups, pre-tests were performed.The program was applied to students in the experimental group.The program was implemented for six weeks based on the theme of innovative thinking.The program developed a training program based on the Tyler Taba model. This model, which is often used in developing educational programs, includes all the necessary steps to teach and accept a new concept. In the ITDP training program, an interactive educational content has been created in which knowledge will be transformed into behavior.In the training, subjects were taught in units, workshops were held, seminars were given. Post-tests were applied at the end of the training.
Innovative Thinking Development Program (ITDP)
With the implementation of the program, nursing students are expected to develop innovative thinking skills.
Control Group I
Pre-test and post-tests were applied to the non-intervention group
No interventions assigned to this group
Control Group II
Pre-test and post-tests were applied to the non-intervention group
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Innovative Thinking Development Program (ITDP)
With the implementation of the program, nursing students are expected to develop innovative thinking skills.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Being open to communication,
* Being a fourth year nursing student,
* Not to be an innovation and entrepreneurship course in the curriculum,
* Students have online access opportunities.
Exclusion Criteria
* Not being open to communication,
* Not being a fourth year nursing student,
* To come by undergraduate transfer and to have taken innovation and entrepreneurship course at the faculty he came from,
* Students do not have online access facilities.
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ondokuz Mayıs University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ilknur Aydin Avci
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
İlknur Aydın Avcı, Prof
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ondokuz Mayıs University
Samsun, Atakum, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019/340
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.