IG vs ID Bitter Administration

NCT ID: NCT03985865

Last Updated: 2019-06-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-03-02

Study Completion Date

2018-05-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We want to investigate whether bitter compounds, denatonium benzoate and quinine hydrochloride, have a distinct effect on gastrointestinal hormone release after infusion into the stomach or duodenum. Furthermore, we want to observe an effect on hunger sensations and hedonic food intake. Moreover, we suggest somatostatin as a driving factor for decreased motilin and ghrelin release after intragastric administration.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Intragastric administration of the bitter tastants denatonium benzoate (DB) or quinine hydrochloride (QHCl) decreases orexigenic hormone levels, and reduces hunger sensations. Contradictory, in vitro studies on human gastric and duodenal tissue showed that DB exposure increased motilin and octanoylated ghrelin levels. DB stimulated somatostatin (SST) release, which is an inhibiting paracrine hormone. We hypothesized that the reduction in hunger ratings and hormone levels is stronger after intragastric compared to intraduodenal administration, and that these differences are mediated by differential SST release. Fourteen healthy female volunteers participated in a randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study. After an overnight fast, DB (1 µmol/kg), QHCl (10 µmol/kg) or placebo were given intragastric or intraduodenal via a feeding tube. Blood samples were taken at regular time points to obtain the hormonal release. Hunger was rated at the same points on a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). Ad libitum milkshake intake was assessed at the end of the experiment and taste was scored on a VAS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intragastric quinine hydrochloride

10 µmol of quinine hydrochloride per kg body weight was administrated into the stomach.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intragastric quinine hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the stomach, and checked with a pH strip. 10 µmol of quinine hydrochloride per kg body weight was administrated into the stomach.

intragastric denatonium benzoate

1 µmol of denatonium benzoate per kg body weight was administrated into the stomach.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intragastric denatonium benzoate

Intervention Type DRUG

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the stomach, and checked with a pH strip. 1 µmol of denatonium benzoate per kg body weight was administrated into the stomach.

Intragastric placebo

0.1 ml of water (placebo) per kg body weight was administrated into the stomach.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Intragastric placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the stomach, and checked with a pH strip. 0.1 ml of water (placebo) per kg body weight was administrated into the stomach.

Intraduodenal quinine hydrochloride

10 µmol of quinine hydrochloride per kg body weight was administrated into the duodenum.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intraduodenal quinine hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the duodenum, and checked with fluoroscopy. 10 µmol of quinine hydrochloride per kg body weight was administrated into the duodenum.

Intraduodenal denatonium benzoate

1 µmol of denatonium benzoate per kg body weight was administrated into the duodenum.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intraduodenal denatonium benzoate

Intervention Type DRUG

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the duodenum, and checked with fluoroscopy. 1 µmol of denatonium benzoate per kg body weight was administrated into the duodenum.

Intraduodenal placebo

0.1 ml of water (placebo) per kg body weight was administrated into the duodenum.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Intraduodenal placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the duodenum, and checked with fluoroscopy. 0.1 ml of water (placebo) per kg body weight was administrated into the duodenum.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intragastric quinine hydrochloride

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the stomach, and checked with a pH strip. 10 µmol of quinine hydrochloride per kg body weight was administrated into the stomach.

Intervention Type DRUG

Intragastric denatonium benzoate

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the stomach, and checked with a pH strip. 1 µmol of denatonium benzoate per kg body weight was administrated into the stomach.

Intervention Type DRUG

Intragastric placebo

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the stomach, and checked with a pH strip. 0.1 ml of water (placebo) per kg body weight was administrated into the stomach.

Intervention Type DRUG

Intraduodenal quinine hydrochloride

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the duodenum, and checked with fluoroscopy. 10 µmol of quinine hydrochloride per kg body weight was administrated into the duodenum.

Intervention Type DRUG

Intraduodenal denatonium benzoate

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the duodenum, and checked with fluoroscopy. 1 µmol of denatonium benzoate per kg body weight was administrated into the duodenum.

Intervention Type DRUG

Intraduodenal placebo

A nasogastric feeding tube was positioned into the duodenum, and checked with fluoroscopy. 0.1 ml of water (placebo) per kg body weight was administrated into the duodenum.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

IG QHCl IG DB IG PLC ID QHCl IG DB ID PLC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject is female between 18 and 65 years of age.
* Subject has a BMI between 18 and 25 kg/m² and has a stable body weight for at least 3 consecutive months at the start of the study and keeps a stable weight during the study visits.
* Women of child-bearing potential agree to apply during the entire duration of the trial a highly effective method of birth control, which is defined as those which result in a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used constantly and correctly such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptive method, or some intrauterine devices (IUDs), sexual abstinence, or vasectomized partner. Women of non-childbearing potential may be included if surgically sterile (tubal ligation or hysterectomy) or postmenopausal with at least 2 year without spontaneous menses.
* Subject understands the study procedures and agrees to participate in the study by giving written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject is under age of legal consent, male, pregnant or breastfeeding.
* Subject with a BMI ≥ 18 kg/m² or BMI ≤ 25 kg/m².
* Subject has current symptoms or a history of gastrointestinal or other significant somatic or psychiatric diseases or drug allergies.
* Subject has diabetes.
* Subject has a significant heart, lung, liver or kidney disease.
* Subject has any history of a neurological disorder.
* Subject has a history of abdominal surgery. Those having undergone a simple appendectomy more than 1 year prior to the screening visit may participate.
* Subject shows abnormal eating behavior or has an eating disorder.
* History or current use of drugs that can affect glycaemia, gastrointestinal function, motility or sensitivity or gastric acidity.
* History or current use of centrally acting medication, including antidepressants, antipsychotics and/or benzodiazepines (in the last year before screening visit).
* Subject consumes excessive amounts of alcohol, defined as \>14 units per week.
* Subject is currently (defined as within approximately 1 year of the screening visit) a regular or irregular user (including "recreational use") of any illicit drugs (including marijuana) or has a history of drug (including alcohol) abuse. Further, patient is unwilling to refrain from the use of drugs during this study.
* High caffeine intake (\> 500 ml coffee daily or equivalent).
* Inability or unwillingness to perform all of the study procedures, or the subject is considered unsuitable in any way by the principal investigator.
* Recent participation (\<30 days) or simultaneous participation in another clinical study.
* Subjects with lactose intolerance.
* Subjects with quinine allergy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan Tack

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UZ Leuven

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

TARGID

Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Verbeure W, Deloose E, Toth J, Rehfeld JF, Van Oudenhove L, Depoortere I, Tack J. The endocrine effects of bitter tastant administration in the gastrointestinal system: intragastric versus intraduodenal administration. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jul 1;321(1):E1-E10. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00636.2020. Epub 2021 May 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34029163 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S551166

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Postprandial Hemodynamics
NCT01027507 COMPLETED