Comparison Between Dual Energy/Subtraction CT With MRI for the Identification of Predictors of Malignancy in Cystic Pancreatic Lesions

NCT ID: NCT03320733

Last Updated: 2024-03-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2023-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cystic pancreatic lesions are increasingly detected incidentally in imaging studies, reportedly in up to 45% of the abdominal Magnetic Resonance (MR) examinations. The majority of these lesions have potential to become cancer, therefore requiring surgery or imaging follow-up to monitor the development of features indicative of malignant transformation. Abdominal MR is the current standard of care for the follow-up of pancreatic cysts (PCs). However, MR is expensive and access is limited, In our institution, more than 35 MR studies for assessment of PCs were performed each month in 2015, placing a significant burden on the health care system that includes contributing to longer MR wait times for other indications.

The investigators will compare MR to two new computed tomography (CT) techniques - dual energy CT (DECT) and Subtraction imaging - with regards to their ability to detect features associated with increased risk of malignancy (enhancing septa and mural nodules) in PCs. For cases where there is disagreement between these 2 CT techniques and MR, histopathology of the surgical specimen or the results of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) will serve as reference standard.

Using DECT or Subtraction instead of MR for the assessment and follow-up of PCs would save significant healthcare costs and MR slots, which could be released to other indications and to reduce waiting times. Furthermore, if DECT and/or Subtraction imaging end up demonstrating to be superior to MR for this purpose, patients with cystic pancreatic lesions could have a direct benefit.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

With the rapid technological advancement, growth and widespread use of cross-sectional imaging, there has been increased detection of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCs). The reported incidence of pancreatic cysts varies widely, with some studies reporting incidental pancreatic cysts detected in 0.7-2.6 % of asymptomatic adults undergoing imaging. The incidence reportedly increases with age with a greater than 8% detection rate in those over age 80 years. The prevalence of a cystic pancreatic lesion in one autopsy series was as high as 24%. For MRI, the frequency of detection of a pancreatic cyst is significantly higher than that of CT, with a reported prevalence of 13-45 % for MRI. Consequently, there has been a significant increased number of MRs ordered for follow-up of these lesions. In our institution, more than 35 MR studies for assessment of PCs were performed each month in 2015. This represents greater than 5% of all abdominal/pelvic MR examinations, and this number appears to be growing. The impact on health care system - particularly on health care costs as well as MR waiting times for patients with other conditions - is significant. For instance, in our institution, the average waiting period in 2015 for an outpatient MR enterography for patients with Crohn's disease is over 6 months.

Recently, dual energy CT (DECT) has proven to be robust and clinically useful for many abdominal applications (including solid pancreatic masses). The investigators expect V2R kVmAS DECT and Subtraction imaging - two promising techniques which have scarcely been investigated in abdominal disease processes in the literature - to prove to be very useful for the characterization of pancreatic cysts and to demonstrate comparable diagnostic accuracy compared to MR

The aim of the study is to investigate whether optimized DECT and/or Subtraction imaging protocols allow for characterization of cystic pancreatic lesions (in particular, the presence of enhancing septa and mural nodules) with a diagnostic accuracy equivalent to or greater than MRI.

This is a prospective, single-institution study in patients who are being evaluated or followed for known pancreatic cystic lesions who are planned for a CT and MRI scan. All MRI scans performed during the study period will be monitored prospectively to identify consecutive patients undergoing MRI for assessment or follow-up of pancreatic cystic lesions and meeting the study inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Patients will be divided into two groups:

\- Group 1 includes patients who will undergo surgery for their pancreatic cysts: For these patients, a pre-operative CT abdomen is routinely performed for surgical planning purposes. The treating surgeon will contact the study team to arrange for the CT scan - which will include a DECT scan - to be performed on the appropriate scanner.

\- Group 2 includes patients who are undergoing surveillance. For these patients, the standard of care is typically to follow these patients annually with serial MRI scans.

In cases where findings on MRI are in doubt, a CT scan - which will include a DECT scan - will be requested as a problem solving tool and part of the standard of care.

For most patients, a CT scan is not required as part of the standard of care. In these cases, patients will be recruited and consented for an additional CT scan - which will include a DECT scan - to be performed within 6 months of their MRI. This CT scan is in addition to the standard of care. The patient will be recruited at the time of the first follow-up appointment with their treating surgeon after their MRI scan.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Cyst

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgical

Includes patients who will undergo surgery for their pancreatic cysts.

In addition to the routine pre-operative CT abdomen performed for surgical planning purposes, these patients will receive Dual Energy CT scan with subtraction imaging before surgery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dual energy CT scan with subtraction imaging

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The single source V2R kmAS dual energy CT system has several theoretical advantages compared, such as perfectly matched X-ray paths and the possibility of performing dual-energy processing using projection data.

Subtraction imaging is an accurate deformable registration algorithm that allows creation of iodine maps from matched pre- and post-contrast acquisitions. This algorithm can be applied to both single and dual energy CT.

Surveillance

Includes patients who are undergoing surveillance for their pancreatic cysts.

Dual Energy CT scan with subtraction imaging will be performed in addition to the standard-of-care surveillance method of MRI scans.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dual energy CT scan with subtraction imaging

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The single source V2R kmAS dual energy CT system has several theoretical advantages compared, such as perfectly matched X-ray paths and the possibility of performing dual-energy processing using projection data.

Subtraction imaging is an accurate deformable registration algorithm that allows creation of iodine maps from matched pre- and post-contrast acquisitions. This algorithm can be applied to both single and dual energy CT.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dual energy CT scan with subtraction imaging

The single source V2R kmAS dual energy CT system has several theoretical advantages compared, such as perfectly matched X-ray paths and the possibility of performing dual-energy processing using projection data.

Subtraction imaging is an accurate deformable registration algorithm that allows creation of iodine maps from matched pre- and post-contrast acquisitions. This algorithm can be applied to both single and dual energy CT.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients of all ethnic groups older than 40 years old
* Cystic pancreatic lesions larger than 1 cm documented by MR
* Scheduled for surgery (Group 1) or undergoing surveillance (Group 2) for a pancreatic cyst by a hepatobiliary surgeon at UHN (University Health Network)

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with contraindication for contrast-enhanced CT or MRI
* Pregnancy
* Patients who do not consent to the study
* Patients younger than 40 years old or with pancreatic cysts less than 1 cm
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luis Guimaraes, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Toronto, Department of Medical Imaging

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Toronto, Department of Medical Imaging

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-5314.0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

MR Urography vs CT Urography
NCT02606513 COMPLETED NA