CT KUB in Renal Cysts

NCT ID: NCT07187791

Last Updated: 2025-09-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-10-01

Study Completion Date

2027-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. Primary (main):

1\. Determine the diagnostic accuracy of CT KUB in differentiating between benign and suspicious renal cysts according to the Bosniak classification.
2. Secondary (subsidiary):

1. Assess interobserver agreement in CT KUB interpretation among radiologists with varying levels of expertise.
2. Identify limitations and pitfalls in the use of non-contrast CT KUB for characterizing renal cysts.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Renal cysts are among the most frequently encountered incidental findings(1) on abdominal imaging, particularly with the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging. Most simple cysts are benign and require no further evaluation.

However, complex cystic lesions pose a diagnostic challenge, necessitating accurate characterization to distinguish benign from malignant lesions.(2).

While CT KUB is highly effective for detecting urinary tract stones, there are several limitations and pitfalls we should be aware of as Limited Soft Tissue Assessment as without contrast, masses, infections, or vascular lesions may not be clearly visible also some tumors called isodensity tumors, have similar intensity values to the surrounding normal tissues.(3).

Segmentation of kidney tumors on CT KUB images adds challenges compared to contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images, due to low contrast and lack of multiphase images. On CECT images, the kidney tumors have different intensity values compared to the normal tissues.(4).

Validating CT KUB's accuracy in assessing renal cysts could have significant implications for clinical decision making, especially in resource-limited or urgent care settings

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CT KUB Renal Cyst

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CT scan

All Patients will undergo CT KUB cyst evaluation Qualitatively regarding Gross Picture in Imaging and Quantitavely using Hausfield units then patients will undergo Abdomianl ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients referred for CT KUB with detectable Renal cysts

Exclusion Criteria

* 1-Patients with known renal tumors.
* 2-Inadequate imaging quality: CT KUB with severe motion/streak artifact or incomplete anatomical coverage preventing lesion assessment.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Thomas Nabeel Mikha Saied

Resident Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Thomas Nabeel Saied, Resident Doctor

Role: CONTACT

+201012056837

Hisham Mostafa Imam, Professor

Role: CONTACT

+201223971369

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Forookhi, A., Bicchetti, M., Lucciola, S. et al. The thin line that made the difference: a case report on a Bosniak IIF renal cystic mass treated with cyst decortication. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 53, 115 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43055-022-00791-3

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Smith AD, Remer EM, Cox KL, Lieber ML, Allen BC, Shah SN, Herts BR. Bosniak category IIF and III cystic renal lesions: outcomes and associations. Radiology. 2012 Jan;262(1):152-60. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110888. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22106359 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CT in Renal cysts

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

MR Urography vs CT Urography
NCT02606513 COMPLETED NA
Cone Beam CT for Breast Imaging
NCT01880580 COMPLETED
Rapid Abdominal Diagnosis With AI & Radiology
NCT07040358 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
IA Model for Acute Appendicitis in CT
NCT06175169 RECRUITING NA
CT and Radiologist RCT
NCT03121131 COMPLETED NA