Low-dose Whole Body Computed Tomography Scanning

NCT ID: NCT03425032

Last Updated: 2018-11-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

520 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Computed tomography represents the mainstay for diagnosing various diseases in the whole body. Over the past decade, enormous efforts were undertaken by both CT manufacturers and radiologist to reduce the radiation dose to patients. Today, the dose is significantly lower that it was before the era of multislice CT and iterative reconstruction methods. The X-ray beam originating from the tube in a CT system contains a spectrum of different energies, whereby the "harder" beams with higher energy penetrate the patient better, and the "softer" beams will be absorbed through the patient's tissues. Recent research has been shown that the radiation dose can be further reduced by improved primary beam filtering in CT. This study is intended to compare the radiation dose in clinically indicated, routine CT examination while maintaining a diagnostic image quality, on a new CT system with modified primary beam filtering.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

At the Joint Department of Medical Imaging (JDMI), the investigators periodically adjust the radiation dose and modify the clinical imaging protocols in order to continuously optimize image quality in CT. The investigators have formalized the process of radiation dose adjustments by implementing a CT dose committee that meets on a monthly basis and reviews imaging protocols (SOP). The committee includes radiologists, technologists, vendor representative (if needed), managers and the radiation protection officer. Part of the review is the investigator's in-house developed Coral image quality review program as well as the clinically used radiation dose monitoring software (Radiometric).

Part of the evaluation study of the new CT system is to monitor 520 patients who will undergo a clinically indicated CT scan on the new system. Identical to standard-of-care (SOC) quality insurance, the investigators will use the existing monitoring software (Radiometric, JDMI) in order to capture the data in the existing database. The investigators will also capture quality data through the existing CT image quality feedback tool. After installation of the new CT system, the investigators will maintain the radiation dose as currently applied in the standard JDMI wide imaging protocols and examine 20 patients on the new system; radiation dose and image quality feedback will be recorded in the identical fashion to standard operating procedures (CT image quality and radiation dose committee). Subsequently, the investigators will drop the dose by approx. 10% for each scanning protocol and scan the subsequent 250 patients while concurrently analyzing the impact on the collective dose to the patient population. Based on the expected increase in image noise, the investigators will calculate the possible additional dose reduction in percent and modify all protocols accordingly for the subsequent 250 patients. This step-down approach ensures that no CT scan will be performed with too little dose, and that all CT scans remain diagnostic.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Computed Tomography Image Quality

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CT scanner

Regular CT imaging of the abdomen and pelvis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Genesis TSX-350A CT scanner

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients who are clinically scheduled for a CT of the body (any part, or a combination of different parts).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Patrik Rogalla

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UHN

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zhang G, Marshall N, Jacobs R, Liu Q, Bosmans H. Bowtie filtration for dedicated cone beam CT of the head and neck: a simulation study. Br J Radiol. 2013 Aug;86(1028):20130002. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130002. Epub 2013 May 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23728948 (View on PubMed)

Mail N, Moseley DJ, Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. The influence of bowtie filtration on cone-beam CT image quality. Med Phys. 2009 Jan;36(1):22-32. doi: 10.1118/1.3017470.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19235370 (View on PubMed)

Tkaczyk JE, Du Y, Walter D, Wu X, Li J, Toth T. Simulation of CT dose and contrast-to-noise as function of bowtie shape. Proc SPIE 2004;5368:403-410

Reference Type RESULT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

16-5477

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cone Beam CT for Breast Imaging
NCT01880580 COMPLETED