Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
520 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-09-30
2018-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Relevance of Whole-body Computed Tomography Prescription in the Emergency Department : an Identification Tool for Low Risk Patients
NCT05588791
Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CT) Bladder
NCT00913536
Dose Reduction in Thoracic CT
NCT00188461
Interest of the SPECT-CT Scan SUVspect in the New Generation of Gamma-cameras With Semiconductor
NCT03414021
Low Tube Voltage Computed Tomographic (CT) Urography Using Low Concentration Iodine Contrast Agent
NCT01855204
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Part of the evaluation study of the new CT system is to monitor 520 patients who will undergo a clinically indicated CT scan on the new system. Identical to standard-of-care (SOC) quality insurance, the investigators will use the existing monitoring software (Radiometric, JDMI) in order to capture the data in the existing database. The investigators will also capture quality data through the existing CT image quality feedback tool. After installation of the new CT system, the investigators will maintain the radiation dose as currently applied in the standard JDMI wide imaging protocols and examine 20 patients on the new system; radiation dose and image quality feedback will be recorded in the identical fashion to standard operating procedures (CT image quality and radiation dose committee). Subsequently, the investigators will drop the dose by approx. 10% for each scanning protocol and scan the subsequent 250 patients while concurrently analyzing the impact on the collective dose to the patient population. Based on the expected increase in image noise, the investigators will calculate the possible additional dose reduction in percent and modify all protocols accordingly for the subsequent 250 patients. This step-down approach ensures that no CT scan will be performed with too little dose, and that all CT scans remain diagnostic.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CT scanner
Regular CT imaging of the abdomen and pelvis
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Health Network, Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Patrik Rogalla
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UHN
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zhang G, Marshall N, Jacobs R, Liu Q, Bosmans H. Bowtie filtration for dedicated cone beam CT of the head and neck: a simulation study. Br J Radiol. 2013 Aug;86(1028):20130002. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130002. Epub 2013 May 31.
Mail N, Moseley DJ, Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. The influence of bowtie filtration on cone-beam CT image quality. Med Phys. 2009 Jan;36(1):22-32. doi: 10.1118/1.3017470.
Tkaczyk JE, Du Y, Walter D, Wu X, Li J, Toth T. Simulation of CT dose and contrast-to-noise as function of bowtie shape. Proc SPIE 2004;5368:403-410
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16-5477
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.