Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
111 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-08-25
2017-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Virtual Reality Visual Field Testing as an Alternative in Childhood Eye Disease
NCT05150197
Vision In Preschoolers Study (VIP Study)
NCT00038753
Ocular Screening in Children and Young Adults at Risk for Increased Intracranial Pressure
NCT03286426
Evaluation of Different Color Vision Tests in Children
NCT02464241
Validation of the GoCheck KidsĀ® Eye Screeningtest in Infants in Flanders
NCT05484453
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In one study, Peek Acuity visual assessments have been shown to be comparable to that determined by the ophthalmology clinic in patients aged 55 years and older. This study also found that the Peek Acuity is efficient, with an average exam time of 77 seconds compared to 82 seconds using the standard Snellen eye chart.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Peek Acuity Screening
Cell phone application to be used for visual acuity screening.
Peek Acuity
Cell phone application for visual acuity screening
Standard Visual Screening
Standard visual acuity screening administered at Duke University Eye Center regarded as the gold standard.
Standard Visual Screening
Visual screening exam conducted in Duke University Eye Center
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Peek Acuity
Cell phone application for visual acuity screening
Standard Visual Screening
Visual screening exam conducted in Duke University Eye Center
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 3 to less than 18 years of age
Exclusion Criteria
* Over 18 years of age
* Less than 3 years of age
3 Years
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sarah K Jones
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Duke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke UMC
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barry JC, Konig HH. Test characteristics of orthoptic screening examination in 3 year old kindergarten children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;87(7):909-16. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.7.909.
Miller JM, Dobson V, Harvey EM, Sherrill DL. Cost-efficient vision screening for astigmatism in native american preschool children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Sep;44(9):3756-63. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0970.
Anstice N, Spink J, Abdul-Rahman A. Review of preschool vision screening referrals in South Auckland, New Zealand. Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Jul;95(4):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00713.x. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
Simons K. Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996 Jul-Aug;41(1):3-30. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)81990-x.
Schmucker C, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R, Antes G, Lange S, Lagreze W, Kleijnen J. Diagnostic accuracy of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors: a systematic review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;247(11):1441-54. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1150-2. Epub 2009 Aug 11.
Alexander P, Rahi JS, Hingorani M. Provision and cost of children's and young people's eye services in the UK: findings from a single primary care trust. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;93(5):645-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.149203. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
Joish VN, Malone DC, Miller JM. A cost-benefit analysis of vision screening methods for preschoolers and school-age children. J AAPOS. 2003 Aug;7(4):283-90. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(03)00116-2.
Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IA, Weiss HA, Jordan S, Kuper H, Burton MJ. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;133(8):930-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1468.
Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine Section on Ophthalmology; American Association of Certified Orthoptists; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus; American Academy of Ophthalmology. Eye examination in infants, children, and young adults by pediatricians: organizational principles to guide and define the child health care system and/or improve the health of all children. Ophthalmology. 2003 Apr;110(4):860-5. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00414-7.
Zhao L, Stinnett SS, Prakalapakorn SG. Visual Acuity Assessment and Vision Screening Using a Novel Smartphone Application. J Pediatr. 2019 Oct;213:203-210.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00083577
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.