Cell Phone Application for Vision Assessment

NCT ID: NCT03212222

Last Updated: 2019-06-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

111 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-25

Study Completion Date

2017-12-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate how visual acuity assessed with Peek Acuity (a cell phone application to check visual acuity) among preschool and school-aged children 3 to less than18 years of age (1) compares to the standard visual acuity exam in the ophthalmology clinic and (2) performs as a screening test for ocular abnormalities that warrant referral for an eye exam.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Current recommendations suggest that children begin visual acuity screening as early as possible with most children capable at 3 years old though some may not be able to cooperate until 4 years of age. While visual acuity screening is standard in schools and pediatric clinics, the specificity of the exams has been questioned. A number of community screening exams rely on outdated and flawed methods that may not accurately access the vision of all children. Because many children who fail these vision screenings are referred to ophthalmology clinics without a true visual acuity deficit, a more accurate but accessible, cost effective, and feasible vision screening exam is necessary. One solution is a smart phone application designed to assess visual acuity, called Peek Acuity. The application is available for android operating system and can be downloaded as a free beta from the Google Play Store. A short tutorial walks users through the application. The application displays a single letter "E" in 4 positions, 0, 90, 180, and 270 degrees (rolling "E") that does not require English comprehension. Patients are instructed to point in the direction of the arms of the "E." The examiner records the responses by swiping the screen in the direction the patient points. The application uses responses to calculate visual acuity and typical exams can be completed within 2 minutes.

In one study, Peek Acuity visual assessments have been shown to be comparable to that determined by the ophthalmology clinic in patients aged 55 years and older. This study also found that the Peek Acuity is efficient, with an average exam time of 77 seconds compared to 82 seconds using the standard Snellen eye chart.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Visual Impairment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Patient randomly assigned to either be screened first with standard clinic technique or cell phone application. Patient is then screened with other method.
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Peek Acuity Screening

Cell phone application to be used for visual acuity screening.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Peek Acuity

Intervention Type OTHER

Cell phone application for visual acuity screening

Standard Visual Screening

Standard visual acuity screening administered at Duke University Eye Center regarded as the gold standard.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Visual Screening

Intervention Type OTHER

Visual screening exam conducted in Duke University Eye Center

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Peek Acuity

Cell phone application for visual acuity screening

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard Visual Screening

Visual screening exam conducted in Duke University Eye Center

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Capable and willing to provide consent
* 3 to less than 18 years of age

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable or unwilling to give consent
* Over 18 years of age
* Less than 3 years of age
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sarah K Jones

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke UMC

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Barry JC, Konig HH. Test characteristics of orthoptic screening examination in 3 year old kindergarten children. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003 Jul;87(7):909-16. doi: 10.1136/bjo.87.7.909.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12812897 (View on PubMed)

Miller JM, Dobson V, Harvey EM, Sherrill DL. Cost-efficient vision screening for astigmatism in native american preschool children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Sep;44(9):3756-63. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0970.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12939288 (View on PubMed)

Anstice N, Spink J, Abdul-Rahman A. Review of preschool vision screening referrals in South Auckland, New Zealand. Clin Exp Optom. 2012 Jul;95(4):442-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2012.00713.x. Epub 2012 Apr 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22507224 (View on PubMed)

Simons K. Preschool vision screening: rationale, methodology and outcome. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996 Jul-Aug;41(1):3-30. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(97)81990-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8827927 (View on PubMed)

Schmucker C, Grosselfinger R, Riemsma R, Antes G, Lange S, Lagreze W, Kleijnen J. Diagnostic accuracy of vision screening tests for the detection of amblyopia and its risk factors: a systematic review. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;247(11):1441-54. doi: 10.1007/s00417-009-1150-2. Epub 2009 Aug 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19669781 (View on PubMed)

Alexander P, Rahi JS, Hingorani M. Provision and cost of children's and young people's eye services in the UK: findings from a single primary care trust. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 May;93(5):645-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.149203. Epub 2008 Dec 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19098035 (View on PubMed)

Joish VN, Malone DC, Miller JM. A cost-benefit analysis of vision screening methods for preschoolers and school-age children. J AAPOS. 2003 Aug;7(4):283-90. doi: 10.1016/s1091-8531(03)00116-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12917617 (View on PubMed)

Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IA, Weiss HA, Jordan S, Kuper H, Burton MJ. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug;133(8):930-7. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1468.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26022921 (View on PubMed)

Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine Section on Ophthalmology; American Association of Certified Orthoptists; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus; American Academy of Ophthalmology. Eye examination in infants, children, and young adults by pediatricians: organizational principles to guide and define the child health care system and/or improve the health of all children. Ophthalmology. 2003 Apr;110(4):860-5. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00414-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12689914 (View on PubMed)

Zhao L, Stinnett SS, Prakalapakorn SG. Visual Acuity Assessment and Vision Screening Using a Novel Smartphone Application. J Pediatr. 2019 Oct;213:203-210.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.021. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31326117 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00083577

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Assuring Ophthalmologic Follow up
NCT04959422 WITHDRAWN NA
SPOT Vision Screening
NCT03479021 UNKNOWN
Spectacles Lens in Concussed Kids
NCT03123822 TERMINATED NA