Smartphone-based Utility of the Vestibulo-ocular Reflex
NCT ID: NCT06856746
Last Updated: 2025-10-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
35 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-04-21
2025-07-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
1. Can a prototype mHealth application accurately measure outcomes associated with standard dynamic gaze stabilization tests (e.g., static visual acuity, perception time, and maximal head velocity measurements)?
2. How well does a prototype mHealth application identify patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction when compared to healthy volunteers?
3. Does a prototype mHealth application differ in identifying patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction when compared to a commercially-available computer system that uses a gold-standard head-mounted sensor for gaze stabilization testing (GST)?
Participants will:
Perform the well-established GST protocol using a commercially-available computer system that uses a gold-standard head-mounted sensor Perform the well-established GST protocol a novel mHealth application
The following outcomes will be measured:
1. Standard visual acuity (SVA): The smallest readable target based on the user's best-aided vision
2. A perception time test (PTT): The shortest time a target can be accurately identified
3. A dynamic gaze stability test (GST): The maximal head velocity at which a patient can accurately identify the orientation of a presented visual target
This pilot clinical study will provide evidence to further support the use of mobile technology as a low-cost, accessible alternative for vestibular function assessment, particularly for patients in resource-limited settings.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Virtual Environments for Vestibular Rehabilitation
NCT04268745
Spatial Orientation and Vestibular Function
NCT02212847
Early Rehabilitation Using Head Impulse Test for Acute Vestibular Deficit
NCT06660082
Effects of Vestibular Training on Postural Control of Healthy Adults Using Virtual Reality
NCT05941039
Computerized Vestibular Rehabilitation
NCT03589859
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
As telehealth has expanded rapidly in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an increasing need for remote, real-time VOR teleassessments that can provide clinicians and patients with quantifiable, velocity-specific gaze stability data. While some computer-based remote VOR assessment tools exist, they often suffer from limitations in user satisfaction and accuracy. The Gaze Stabilization Test (GST), developed by Goebel et al., provides clinicians with velocity-specific data associated with the VOR's contribution to gaze stabilization. However, this test is typically performed in a clinical setting with specialized equipment, limiting access for many patients.
This pilot clinical study aims to validate a mHealth application (mVOR) prototype as a low-cost, accessible alternative to traditional VOR assessments. By leveraging the head- and eye-tracking capabilities of modern smartphones, this proof-of-concept prototype seeks to provide a novel, mobile-based framework for measuring visual acuity, head velocity, and gaze estimation in patients undergoing vestibular rehabilitation.
Study Objectives \& Hypothesis
Primary Objectives:
To determine whether a prototype mHealth application can accurately assess static visual acuity, perception time, and maximal head velocity in individuals with unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction (UVD).
To compare the accuracy of the mVOR application against a commercially-available, in-office GST system that identifies patients with UVD.
Hypothesis:
The investigators hypothesize that by using the native head and eye-tracking capabilities of smartphones, one can obtain gaze stability (GST) measurements using a mobile platform that provides visual acuity and velocity-specific data comparable to a commercially-available, in-office GST system.
If validated, the mVOR could serve as an platform for effective, low-cost alternatives for telemonitoring vestibular function and enhancing remote rehabilitation programs for individuals with balance disorders.
Anticipated sample size: 50 (25 healthy volunteers and 25 patients with UVD)
Data Analysis
Within-group comparisons:
Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests (depending on data distribution) will compare participants' GST and mVOR scores.
Between-group comparisons:
Independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests will compare UVD vs. healthy volunteer group.
ROC Curve Analysis:
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves will assess the accuracy of mVOR vs. computerized GST in distinguishing patients with UVD
Potential Benefits \& Clinical Significance Increased Accessibility: The mVOR app provides an affordable, mobile alternative to in-office based GST system, expanding access to vestibular rehabilitation.
Telehealth \& Home Monitoring: This study could support remote vestibular assessments, particularly for patients in rural or underserved communities.
Clinical Validation: If the mVOR performs comparably to the in-office based GST, it may be integrated into clinical practice as a validated tool for assessing vestibular function.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Unilateral vestibular dysfunction (UVD)
This group includes with unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction identified via the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and meet the following study criteria:
Inclusion criteria:
* \> 18 y/o
* Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits and study procedures.
* History of unilateral vestibular dysfunction (\>49% asymmetry on bithermal binaural caloric testing) OR surgical ablation of vestibular end organ or nerve, such as via resection of unilateral vestibular schwannoma or labyrinthectomy)
Exclusion criteria:
* No history of vestibular dysfunction
* History of underlying cervical musculoskeletal disease that restricts the neck
* History of cervical dysfunction that prevented them from moving their head, severe visual impairment or blind spots in the field, or central nervous system disorder
No interventions assigned to this group
Healthy volunteers
This group includes with those without a history of unilateral peripheral dysfunction (UVD) and meet the following study criteria:
Inclusion criteria:
* 18 y/o
* Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits and study procedures
Exclusion criteria:
* History of vestibular dysfunction
* History of uncorrected vision
* History of underlying cervical musculoskeletal disease that restricts the neck
* History of cervical dysfunction that prevented them from moving their head, severe visual impairment or blind spots in the field, or central nervous system disorder
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to provide informed consent
* Normal or corrected-to-normal vision (e.g., with glasses or contact lenses)
* Able to sit upright and follow instructions for the duration of the test (\~2-3 hours)
* No known contraindications to head movement (e.g., musculoskeletal or neurological conditions that prevent safe head rotation)
* For vestibular dysfunction group: Participants must have a diagnosed vestibular disorder (e.g., vestibular hypofunction, vestibular neuritis, Meniere's disease, labyrinthitis, vestibular migraine, or post-concussive dizziness)
* For control group: Participants must be free from diagnosed vestibular disorders and report no history of balance issues, dizziness, or vertigo
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive impairment or neurological conditions that could interfere with following instructions (e.g., moderate to severe dementia, uncontrolled seizures, severe traumatic brain injury)
* Severe musculoskeletal or orthopedic conditions affecting the neck or cervical spine that prevent safe head movement (e.g., cervical fusion, severe arthritis, neck instability)
* Acute illness or infection at the time of testing (e.g., flu, COVID-19, severe sinus infection that may impact vestibular function)
* Recent vestibular or neurological surgery (\<6 months prior to study participation)
* Severe hearing loss that prevents understanding spoken instructions
* History of stroke or progressive neurological disorders affecting balance or gaze stability (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, ALS)
* Use of vestibular suppressants (e.g., meclizine, diazepam, scopolamine) within 24 hours of testing
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
NIH
University of Virginia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Bradley Kesser, MD
Department Vice-Chair
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adam Thompson-Harvey, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Virginia
Bradley Kesser, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Virginia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Viginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34. doi: 10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28.
Jacobson GP, Newman CW. The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Apr;116(4):424-7. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1990.01870040046011.
Huang K, Sparto PJ, Kiesler S, Siewiorek DP, Smailagic A. iPod-based in-home system for monitoring gaze-stabilization exercise compliance of individuals with vestibular hypofunction. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Apr 21;11:69. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-69.
Chen PY, Hsieh WL, Wei SH, Kao CL. Interactive wiimote gaze stabilization exercise training system for patients with vestibular hypofunction. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012 Oct 9;9:77. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-77.
Goebel JA, Tungsiripat N, Sinks B, Carmody J. Gaze stabilization test: a new clinical test of unilateral vestibular dysfunction. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Jan;28(1):68-73. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000244351.42201.a7.
Hall CD, Heusel-Gillig L, Tusa RJ, Herdman SJ. Efficacy of gaze stability exercises in older adults with dizziness. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010 Jun;34(2):64-9. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181dde6d8.
Hall CD, Herdman SJ, Whitney SL, Cass SP, Clendaniel RA, Fife TD, Furman JM, Getchius TS, Goebel JA, Shepard NT, Woodhouse SN. Vestibular Rehabilitation for Peripheral Vestibular Hypofunction: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: FROM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION NEUROLOGY SECTION. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016 Apr;40(2):124-55. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000120.
Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Della Santina CC, Schubert MC, Minor LB. Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004. Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 25;169(10):938-44. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.66.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HSR230265
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.