Ocular Screening in Children and Young Adults at Risk for Increased Intracranial Pressure
NCT ID: NCT03286426
Last Updated: 2022-02-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
3 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-10-26
2018-12-08
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optic Nerve Head Quantification While Reducing Elevated Intracranial Pressure
NCT02558309
Non-Invasive and Non-Contact Intracranial Pressure Waveform Recording Using Dynamic Video Ophthalmoscopy
NCT04046523
Cell Phone Application for Vision Assessment
NCT03212222
Non-invasive Diagnostic for Assessing Elevated Intracranial Pressure
NCT03418753
Advancing Pediatric Retinal Imaging With Auto-aligned OCT
NCT06841575
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Additionally, ICP screening in asymptomatic patients remains limited. Patients being treated with medications for acne, specifically tetracyclines (e.g. minocycline and doxycycline), retinol, and isotretinol, are at particular risk for increased ICP but often are not identified until they are symptomatic (i.e. headaches, visual loss, papilledema). Symptom onset has been documented from 2 weeks up to 1 year from drug initiation. The percentage of patients with subclinical asymptomatic disease is unclear. This study would allow us to describe the presence of subclinical disease in our population and the role/utility of routine non-invasive screening methods.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SCREENING
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vision/Eye Screening
Image of back of each eye along with color vision and visual acuity assessment if able.
Pictor
The back of each eye will be imaged with Pictor. Visual acuity and color vision will be checked if patient able to cooperate with exam.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pictor
The back of each eye will be imaged with Pictor. Visual acuity and color vision will be checked if patient able to cooperate with exam.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Less than 22 years of age
* History of or suspicion for elevated ICP or starting/currently taking high-risk medications associated with increased risk for elevated ICP
Exclusion Criteria
* Over 21 years of age
21 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Duke University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sarah K Jones
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Duke University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Duke UMC
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Xu W, Gerety P, Aleman T, Swanson J, Taylor J. Noninvasive methods of detecting increased intracranial pressure. Childs Nerv Syst. 2016 Aug;32(8):1371-86. doi: 10.1007/s00381-016-3143-x. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
Roberts E, Morgan R, King D, Clerkin L. Funduscopy: a forgotten art? Postgrad Med J. 1999 May;75(883):282-4. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.75.883.282.
Sit M, Levin AV. Direct ophthalmoscopy in pediatric emergency care. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001 Jun;17(3):199-204; quiz 205-7. doi: 10.1097/00006565-200106000-00013.
Petrushkin H, Barsam A, Mavrakakis M, Parfitt A, Jaye P. Optic disc assessment in the emergency department: a comparative study between the PanOptic and direct ophthalmoscopes. Emerg Med J. 2012 Dec;29(12):1007-8. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200038. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Golshani K, Ebrahim Zadeh M, Farajzadegan Z, Khorvash F. Diagnostic Accuracy of Optic Nerve Ultrasonography and Ophthalmoscopy in Prediction of Elevated Intracranial Pressure. Emerg (Tehran). 2015 Spring;3(2):54-8.
Day LM, Wang SX, Huang CJ. Nonmydriatic Fundoscopic Imaging Using the Pan Optic iExaminer System in the Pediatric Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):587-594. doi: 10.1111/acem.13128. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
Friedman DI. Medication-induced intracranial hypertension in dermatology. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2005;6(1):29-37. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200506010-00004.
Chiu AM, Chuenkongkaew WL, Cornblath WT, Trobe JD, Digre KB, Dotan SA, Musson KH, Eggenberger ER. Minocycline treatment and pseudotumor cerebri syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998 Jul;126(1):116-21. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(98)00063-4.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00083580
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.