Postoperative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Comparison Between General and Spinal Anesthesia

NCT ID: NCT03176758

Last Updated: 2017-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-06-01

Study Completion Date

2018-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Total knee arthroplasty may be conducted either under general anesthesia or spinal block. previous studies have shown that spinal block leads to less complications. The investigators aim to find whether post-operative pain is also diminished under spinal block compared to general anesthesia

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients who will be registered for a total knee replacement in Meir Medical Center and that will agree to participate in the study will be enrolled into one of two groups: the first, which will be the default choice for all patients, will be operated under a spinal block. Patients who will ask specifically for general anesthesia, or those in which the anesthesiologist will prefer general anesthesia due to medical reasons will be enrolled into the second group. For both groups the surgeon will add intraoperative peri-articular infiltration of local Marcaine injections, which was previously shown to diminish postoperative pain. The postoperative pain will be evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale at different point during the first 48 hours following operation. Physiotherapy achievements will also be recorded. The investigators will try to find whether one of the two groups suffered less pain or had achieved better results in physical therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Knee Replacement Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The participant will be non-randomly enrolled into two groups. The default treatment, which was found as the preferred method by numerous investigators will be offered to all participants. Those who will ask for the second option (general anesthesia) or those who will not be aligble for spinlal block will be enrolled in the second group.
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Spinal block

Intrathecal 10 mg Heavy Marcaine, 200 mcg Morphine + High volume local anesthesia infiltration Bupivacaine 5mg/ml + adrenaline 5 mcg/ml 3mg/kg ideal body weight diluted with 100cc Normal Saline

\+ Total Knee Replacement ( which will not be the intervention of interest)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Spinal Block

Intervention Type DRUG

Intrathecal 10 mg Heavy Marcaine, 200 mcg Morphine + High volume local anesthesia infiltration Bupivacaine 5mg/ml + adrenaline 5 mcg/ml 3mg/kg IBW diluted with 100cc Normal Saline

Total knee replacement

Intervention Type DEVICE

A total knee arthroplasty surgery, which is not the intervention of interest

General anesthesia

1-3 mg IV propofol 0.5 mg/kg IV Rocuronium + Fentanyl 2-3 mcg/kg + Morphine 0.1mg/kg IV Maintenance: Volatile anesthetic + High volume local anesthesia infiltration Bupivacaine 5mg/ml + adrenaline 5 mcg/ml 3mg/kg ideal body weight diluted with 100cc Normal Saline

\+ Total Knee Replacement ( which will not be the intervention of interest)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

General anesthetic

Intervention Type DRUG

1-3 mg IV propofol 0.5 mg/kg IV Rocuronium + Fentanyl 2-3 mcg/kg + Morphine 0.1mg/kg IV Maintenance: Volatile anesthetic + High volume local anesthesia infiltration Bupivacaine 5mg/ml + adrenaline 5 mcg/ml 3mg/kg IBW diluted with 100cc Normal Saline

Total knee replacement

Intervention Type DEVICE

A total knee arthroplasty surgery, which is not the intervention of interest

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Spinal Block

Intrathecal 10 mg Heavy Marcaine, 200 mcg Morphine + High volume local anesthesia infiltration Bupivacaine 5mg/ml + adrenaline 5 mcg/ml 3mg/kg IBW diluted with 100cc Normal Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

General anesthetic

1-3 mg IV propofol 0.5 mg/kg IV Rocuronium + Fentanyl 2-3 mcg/kg + Morphine 0.1mg/kg IV Maintenance: Volatile anesthetic + High volume local anesthesia infiltration Bupivacaine 5mg/ml + adrenaline 5 mcg/ml 3mg/kg IBW diluted with 100cc Normal Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Total knee replacement

A total knee arthroplasty surgery, which is not the intervention of interest

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Neurological block

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all patient who will undergo total knee arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria

* patients who will not agree to participate in the study
* patients who will die during the research timeframe
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Meir Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

David segal

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

david segal, MD

Role: CONTACT

529423951

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Turnbull ZA, Sastow D, Giambrone GP, Tedore T. Anesthesia for the patient undergoing total knee replacement: current status and future prospects. Local Reg Anesth. 2017 Mar 8;10:1-7. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S101373. eCollection 2017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28331362 (View on PubMed)

Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC, Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Xu D, Salviz EA. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):321-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295df80.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23788068 (View on PubMed)

Manickam B, Perlas A, Duggan E, Brull R, Chan VW, Ramlogan R. Feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided block of the saphenous nerve in the adductor canal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):578-80. doi: 10.1097/aap.0b013e3181bfbf84.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19916251 (View on PubMed)

Macfarlane AJ, Prasad GA, Chan VW, Brull R. Does regional anesthesia improve outcome after total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Sep;467(9):2379-402. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0666-9. Epub 2009 Jan 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19130163 (View on PubMed)

Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16651569 (View on PubMed)

Memtsoudis SG, Sun X, Chiu YL, Stundner O, Liu SS, Banerjee S, Mazumdar M, Sharrock NE. Perioperative comparative effectiveness of anesthetic technique in orthopedic patients. Anesthesiology. 2013 May;118(5):1046-58. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318286061d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23612126 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0094-17-MMC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.