Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Accelerated Rehabilitation Protocol Based on Multimodal Analgesia Optimization for Uni-compartmental Knee Prosthesis Surgery
NCT ID: NCT04916158
Last Updated: 2021-06-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-01-07
2022-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Thus, based on the recommendations of the French Society of Anesthesia and Resuscitation, on improved rehabilitation after heavy orthopedic surgery on the lower limb published in 2019 the objective of this study is to evaluate the relevance of a protocol concerning prosthetic knee replacement (PUC) in ambulatory care, based on optimized pain control.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Bone Scintigraphy and Unicompartimental Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03145090
NOCTURNAL PAIN After Knee Arthroplasty : Incidence and Risk Factor: an Observational Study
NCT03998943
Evaluation of Anesthetic Techniques in Outpatient Total Joint Replacement Surgery in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System
NCT04203732
Feasibility Study of Peripheral Venous Cannulation Pain in Predicting Acute Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT06002724
Can Multimodal Medical Strategies Can Delay Total Knee Replacement?
NCT06643845
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Anticipating pain control represents a major asset for ambulatory management. As early as the end of the 1990s, it was demonstrated that pain control is the main parameter in ambulatory surgery .prosthetic knee surgery is a very painful surgery. The efficiency of the adductor canal block is effective in this context. It reduces the motor block obtained at the level of the femoral block, which is particularly interesting for ambulatory management with a view to the patient's planned fast walking. The IPACK (interspace between popliteal artery and the capsule posterior knee) is designed to block the small sensory branches of the sciatic nerve that travel in this space without affecting the motor components. The IPACK block provides analgesia only for the posterior knee and would probably be ineffective alone for postoperative analgesia,so it is often performed with an adductor canal block in a multimodal analgesic pathway. Although this block is performed in several institutions, data is still emerging on its effectiveness. For example, a randomized trial in a single institution involving 86 patients undergoing GPT revealed that the combination of IPACK, adductor canal block and periarticular infiltration improved postoperative analgesia and reduced opioid consumption compared to periarticular injection alone .
Thus, based on the SFAR recommendations on improved rehabilitation after heavy orthopedic surgery on the lower limb published in 2019 , we set up a protocol for a feasibility study of prosthetic knee replacement (PUC) on an outpatient basis, based on optimized pain control.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* \>18 and \< 85 years of age,
* Score ASA 1-2,
* No cognitive impairment,
* No thromboembolic TCDA,
* Without CI to local anesthetics, analgesics,
* Accepting outpatient care
* No opposition formulated
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, ...)
* Refusal to participate
* Support for a total knee prosthesis,
* Emergency surgery or revision surgery,
* ASA3-4,
* SAOS not fitted,
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics,
* Outpatient discharge criteria not met.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Brest
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHRU de Brest
Brest, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Claire-Marine Grayo
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
29BRC20.0324
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.