EMBOLIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH TOTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS WITH PAIN RESISTANT TO MEDICAL TREATMENT

NCT ID: NCT04566315

Last Updated: 2024-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-06

Study Completion Date

2022-09-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to evaluate at 3 months in a prospective study, the effectiveness of arterial embolization of neo-vessels in patients with a painful total knee prosthesis despite a well-conducted medical treatment

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To date, no study has attempted to measure the effects of arterial embolization on pain in patients with total knee prosthesis. It would be interesting to evaluate, in a therapeutic trial with a good level of evidence, this alternative to drug treatments that are often poorly tolerated, contraindicated or failing in this population of elderly subjects often presenting co-morbidities. This pilot study will be used to calculate the number of patients to be included in a comparative, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. In addition to the evaluation of the undesirable effects of arterial embolization, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness at 3 and 6 months of embolization of the neovessels on pain, stiffness, physical activity, quality of life and consumption of analgesics and anti-inflammatories.

Evaluation criteria: modification of the pain item in the EVA (Analog Visual Scale), EQ-5D (quality of life scale), and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) self-questionnaire collected in the 15 days preceding the procedure and then at 3 and 6 months ; the use of analgesics and anti-inflammatories; adverse events.

Study population: Patients aged 40 to 80 years with a painful total knee joint. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score must be greater than or equal to 50 mm for at least 3 months optimal medical treatment, and for whom, no surgical retreatment is indicated.

The expected benefits are the improvement of the treatment of patients in therapeutic impasse, wearing a total knee prosthesis whose pain is rebellious and disabling. More generally, the investigators expect an improvement in the quality of life of these patients currently without satisfactory alternative care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ARTERIAL EMBOLIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH TOTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS

SYMPTOMATIC EFFECTIVENESS OF MICROPARTICLE ARTERIAL EMBOLIZATION IN PATIENTS WITH TOTAL KNEE PROSTHESIS WITH PAIN RESISTANT TO MEDICAL TREATMENT

Group Type OTHER

Arteriography knee arteriography

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

arteriography and an injection of inert microparticles of 75 μm in neovessels

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arteriography knee arteriography

arteriography and an injection of inert microparticles of 75 μm in neovessels

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Man or woman aged 40 to 80.
* Total knee joint or bilateral Pain with EVA ≥ 50 mm evolving for at least 3 months despite the initiation of a well conducted medical treatment according to current recommendations including analgesics, NSAIDs, rehabilitation and weight loss

Exclusion Criteria

* Minor person.
* Protected adults under the law. Patients deprived of their liberties. Subject not cooperative or unable to meet the requirements of the protocol.
* Subject participating in another clinical trial or in period of exclusion from a previous clinical trial. Severe visceral failure.
* Local infection. Algoneurodystrophy.
* Prosthesis loosening.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
* Allergy to contrast media.
* Chronic or acute renal failure (clearance \<30 ml / min).
* Hemostasis disorders (blood platelet count \<50,000 / mm3 or patient TCA / control TCA\> 1.2 or TP \<50%).
* Operative indication for removal of the retained prosthesis.
* Patient with obliterating arterial disease of the lower limbs.
* Contraindication to lidocaine: Known hypersensitivity to lidocaine hydrochloride, to local amide anesthetics or to any of the excipients.
* Patients with recurrent porphyria
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jacques Sedat, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU de Nice

Nice, CHU de NICE, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-A01447-32

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

19-AOIP-04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.