Effects of Microprocessor-controlled Knee Joints on Community Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT04112901

Last Updated: 2019-10-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

330 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-15

Study Completion Date

2020-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

About 21% to 35% of people with limb loss are those who lost their limb at trans-femoral level (i.e. above the knee). The increasing number of diabetes-related limb loss (amputation) and the rising proportion of older adult amputees indicates more amputees with limited mobility in the future. Among other factors, prosthesis success highly depends on the function of the knee joints during daily activities.

Presently, there are two categories of prosthetic knee joints; microprocessor-controlled knees (MPKs) and non-microprocessor-controlled knees (n-MPKs). Whilst the n-MPKs are unable to change the knee stiffness, the MPKs alter the joint stiffness and speed of movement according to the users' walking speed.

Although past studies indicate that MPKs could result in reduced risk of falls, improved balance and activity in limited mobility amputees, there is a lack of strong evidence on the effect of MPKs on community outcomes. The aim of this study is to compare activity, mobility, social functioning, depression, anxiety, and health-related quality of life in limited mobility trans-femoral or through-knee (i.e. knee disarticulation) amputees who are users of MPKs prosthesis with users of a prosthesis with n-MPKs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

People With Trans-femoral Amputation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

People with trans-femoral amputation or knee dis-articulation

include individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation or knee disarticulation, with ≤ K2 mobility grade OR SIGAM grade D or below; i.e. able to walk ≤ 50 meters on level ground, who have been users of either microprocessor-controlled knee or non-microprocessor-controlled knee joint for at least 6 months prior to the recruitment date.

Microprocessor-controlled knee joints

Intervention Type DEVICE

Any type of microprocessor-controlled knee joints will be considered; this includes those controlling stance phase only (e.g. Compact C-Leg), swing phase only (e.g. Smart IP), both swing and stance phases (e.g. Reho knee), or power generating knees (e.g. POWER knee Ossur).

Non-microprocessor-controlled knee joints

Intervention Type DEVICE

Any non-microprocessor-controlled knee joints such as prosthesis incorporating hydraulic, polycentric, pneumatic mechanisms, friction or locked knees.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Microprocessor-controlled knee joints

Any type of microprocessor-controlled knee joints will be considered; this includes those controlling stance phase only (e.g. Compact C-Leg), swing phase only (e.g. Smart IP), both swing and stance phases (e.g. Reho knee), or power generating knees (e.g. POWER knee Ossur).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Non-microprocessor-controlled knee joints

Any non-microprocessor-controlled knee joints such as prosthesis incorporating hydraulic, polycentric, pneumatic mechanisms, friction or locked knees.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Unilateral transfemoral amputation or knee disarticulation
* ≤ K2 mobility grade OR SIGAM grade D or below; i.e. able to walk ≤ 50 meters on level ground,
* Users of either MPK or N-MPK for at least 6 months prior to the recruitment date.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Derby

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Reza Safari

Research Fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Reza Safari

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Derby

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Reza Safari, PhD.

Role: CONTACT

+441332592418

Nicola Barnett

Role: CONTACT

01332 592035

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

V1.2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.