C-Leg 3 and C-Leg 4 Study in Transfemoral Amputees

NCT ID: NCT02765035

Last Updated: 2021-10-14

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

18 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-04-30

Study Completion Date

2018-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this post-market study is to confirm that the microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee components (C-Leg 3 and C-Leg 4) in comparison to mechanical knee joints can bring additional benefit to the users primarily on level walking and secondarily in safety, stair and hill mobility, activities of daily living, satisfaction and preference.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

During the last two decades many microprocessor controlled knee joints (MPK) appeared on the market.The newly developed C-Leg 4 aims to provide improved standing function while in the same time offering technology of knee´s previous version (C-Leg 3). Since added functional benefit of a knee joint cannot be anticipated just due to the fact that the knee is controlled by the microprocessor, the aim of this post-market study is to evaluate the safety, functional mobility and satisfaction of the microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee components C-Leg 3 and C-Leg 4 in comparison to mechanical knee joints. Additional goal is to improve the methodological quality of research conducted in the field.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

C-Leg 3, then C-Leg 4

Participants are first fitted with a C-Leg 3, receive physical therapy, acclimate for 90 days and are then assessed in the clinic. They then receive a C-Leg 4, receive additional physical therapy and acclimate for 30 days after which they are again assessed in the clinic.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

C-Leg 4

Intervention Type DEVICE

Microprocessor Controlled Knee

C-Leg 3

Intervention Type DEVICE

Microprocessor Controlled Knee

C-Leg 4, then C-Leg 3

Participants are first fitted with a C-Leg 4, receive physical therapy, acclimate for 90 days and are then assessed in the clinic. They then receive a C-Leg 3, receive additional physical therapy and acclimate for 30 days after which they are again assessed in the clinic.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

C-Leg 4

Intervention Type DEVICE

Microprocessor Controlled Knee

C-Leg 3

Intervention Type DEVICE

Microprocessor Controlled Knee

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

C-Leg 4

Microprocessor Controlled Knee

Intervention Type DEVICE

C-Leg 3

Microprocessor Controlled Knee

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Person is \>18 years old.
* Person is a unilateral transfemoral or knee-disarticulation amputee with stabilized residual limb.
* Person is a K2, K3 or K4 ambulator based on Medicare Functional Classification Level (MFCL).
* Person is currently fitted with a prosthesis using a non-microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee for at least 6 months.
* Person was never fitted with microprocessor controlled prosthetic knee joint.
* Person is willing and able to independently provide informed consent.
* Person is willing to comply with study procedures.
* Person wears prosthesis daily and ≥ 8 hours/day.
* Person is walking on average 1km/day.
* Person is walking not slower than 3km/h (\~0.8m/s) (based on 10m walk test conducted during recruiting).
* Person is walking on level ground in a step over step manner.

Exclusion Criteria

* Person is under 18 years of age.
* Person who weighs more than 136kg.
* Person who weighs less than 50kg.
* Person who is pregnant.
* Person has a history of chronic skin breakdown on the residual limb.
* Person has conditions that would prevent participation and pose increased risk (e.g. unstable cardiovascular conditions that preclude physical activity such as walking).
* Person falls ≥ once a week due to the reasons that could not be corrected by the new prosthesis (for ex. problems with vestibular system).
* Person is using under arm axillary crutches or walker.
* Person in an emergency, life threatening situation.
* Person is unwilling/unable to follow instructions.
* Person who is not available to follow the entire study protocol.
* Person who is participating in another study or intends to participate in another study during this study duration.
* Person who cannot personally provide their consent.
* Person who is not wearing prosthesis 8hours/day on average.
* Person who has a score on 10m walk test less than 3km/h (\~0.8m/s) (based on 10m walk test conducted during recruiting).
* Person who walks on average less than 1km per day.
* Person who is not able to walk on level ground in a step over step manner.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Otto Bock Healthcare Products GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephan Domayer, Prim.Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Orthopedic Rehabilitation Center SKA Zicksee

Sankt Andrä am Zicksee, Burgenland, Austria

Site Status

University Leuven

Pellenberg, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Belgium

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PD-PS00120010A-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id