Passive Microprocessor-controlled Knees vs. Active Microprocessor-controlled Knees After Transfemoral Amputation
NCT ID: NCT06406491
Last Updated: 2024-05-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
10 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-04-23
2024-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Rehabilitation After Transfemoral Amputation in Moderately Active Patients
NCT06045468
Use of Passive, Adaptive, and Active Prosthetic Knees in Persons With Unilateral, Transfemoral Amputation
NCT02219230
Metabolic Cost of Walking With Passive vs. Powered Microprocessor Controlled Knees
NCT05048355
The Effect of Different Microprocessor Knee Prostheses on Mobility and Gait Parameters in Transfemoral Amputees
NCT04966936
Effects of Microprocessor-controlled Knee Joints on Community Outcomes
NCT04112901
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The target group includes individuals with transfemoral amputation or knee disarticulation, aged 18 and above, with anticipated moderate to high mobility levels, and currently using an electronic prosthetic knee. The study plans to enroll participants nearing the end of their prosthetic cycle, allowing for comparison between different prosthetic options.
Key objectives include comparing walking distance, stair climbing, and hill ascent between passive and active prostheses, as well as evaluating mobility, daily functionality, quality of life, and fear of falling.
The study design is prospective with a pre-post design, aiming for an intra-individual comparison between active and passive prostheses. It outlines inclusion and exclusion criteria, study procedures, and discontinuation criteria for both individual and overall study termination.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Subjects
Baseline measurements for all subjects is carried out with their own passive microprocessor-controlled knee prosthesis. After 4 weeks of use of active microprocessor-controlled knee, second measurement is carried out. All subjects follow the same study path.
active microprocessor-controlled knee
Active microprocessor-controlled knees are motorized prosthesis, actively supporting the users while walking, getting up, and climbing stairs.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
active microprocessor-controlled knee
Active microprocessor-controlled knees are motorized prosthesis, actively supporting the users while walking, getting up, and climbing stairs.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* passive microprocessor-controlled knee
* resupply with new prosthesis within the next few months
* K-Level 2 or 3
* body weight no more than 125 kg
* German speakers
Exclusion Criteria
* unable to give informed consent
* body weight more than 125 kg
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
OTHER
Median
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Johannes Schroeter
Clinical Director and Head of Orthopaedic Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Johannes Schröter, Dr. med.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
MEDIAN Reha-Center Wiesbaden Sonnenberg
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MEDIAN Clinics
Wiesbaden, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Probsting E, Blumentritt S, Kannenberg A. [Changes in the Locomotor System as a Consequence of Amputation of a Lower Limb]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2017 Feb;155(1):77-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-112821. Epub 2016 Sep 15. German.
Hunt GR, Hood S, Gabert L, Lenzi T. Can a powered knee-ankle prosthesis improve weight-bearing symmetry during stand-to-sit transitions in individuals with above-knee amputations? J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 May 2;20(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01177-w.
Hunt GR, Hood S, Gabert L, Lenzi T. Effect of Increasing Assistance From a Powered Prosthesis on Weight-Bearing Symmetry, Effort, and Speed During Stand-Up in Individuals With Above-Knee Amputation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2023;31:11-21. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3214806. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
Ledoux ED, Goldfarb M. Control and Evaluation of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis for Stair Ascent. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Jul;25(7):917-924. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2656467. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Intuy2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.