The Efficacy of the Whisperflow CPAP System Versus Nasal High Flow in Patients at High Risk for Postextubation Failure

NCT ID: NCT02918786

Last Updated: 2016-09-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

140 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2017-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered by the variable generator WhisperFlow System with high flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated patient who are at risk for postextubation failure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Postextubation respiratory failure is not an uncommon condition after discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Subsequently reintubation and mechanical ventilation for postextubation respiratory failure may lead to increasing of hospital morbidity and mortality and and prolonging intensive care and hospital stay. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation to prevent the postextubation failure in patients with high risk for extubation failure.

The variable generator whisper flow system ((Philips Respironics, Murrysville, PA, USA) is the one of widely used continuous positive airway pressure(CPAP) device in UK. This device employs an oxygen-driven venturi to entrain air and generates high fresh gas flow up to 140 liter per minute. The oxygen/air mixture enters the breathing circuit and exits through a threshold resistor namely CPAP valve. Whisperflow is able to provide the flow into the breathing system via oronasal mask which exceeds the peak inspiratory flow rate of the patient and may improve work of breathing as well as gas exchange. In daily clinical practice, the investigators apply this device with humidifier in patients with weaning difficulty and patients who are at risk for postextubation failure.

High-flow nasal oxygen therapy(HFNO) is a device which heated and humidified oxygen is distributed to the nose at high flow rates. With the high flow rate (up to 60 Liter per minute), it generates low level of positive airway pressure. Physiological benefits of HFNO comprises decreasing of the dead space, work of breathing and the low level of positive airway pressure associated with better lung recruitment. Furthermore, the fraction of inspired oxygen can be adjusted and measured by changing the fraction of oxygen in the driving gas.

In the present randomized, controlled trial, the investigators will compare two devices for oxygen therapy, with low levels of continuous positive airway pressure, nasal high-flow oxygen therapy and CPAP of 5 cmH2O delivered by the variable generator WhisperFlow System with oronasal mask , in critically ill patients who are at risk for postextubation failure. The investigators hypothesize that nasal high-flow is superior to CPAP the in terms of reintubation rate.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Continuous positive airway pressure

After extubation, patients will receive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered by the variable generator WhisperFlow System (control) Intervention:Device : CPAP of 5 cmH2O delivered by the variable generator WhisperFlow System for 48 hours

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CPAP

Intervention Type DEVICE

After extubation, patients will receive CPAP at 5 cmH2O delivered by the variable generator WhisperFlow System. The FiO2 will be adjusted in order to obtain a SpO2 between 92% and 98% in hypoxemic patients and between 88% and 95% in hypercapnic patients.

Nasal high-flow

After extubation, patients will receive oxygen therapy through the nasal high-flow (intervention) Intervention: Device: Nasal high-flow

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nasal high-flow

Intervention Type DEVICE

After extubation, the patients will receive oxygen delivered through the nasal high-flow system (Optiflow™). The FiO2 will be adjusted in order to obtain a SpO2 between 92% and 98% in hypoxemic patients and between 88% and 95% in hypercapnic patients. Gas flow will be set until maximal level of 60 LPM.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nasal high-flow

After extubation, the patients will receive oxygen delivered through the nasal high-flow system (Optiflow™). The FiO2 will be adjusted in order to obtain a SpO2 between 92% and 98% in hypoxemic patients and between 88% and 95% in hypercapnic patients. Gas flow will be set until maximal level of 60 LPM.

Intervention Type DEVICE

CPAP

After extubation, patients will receive CPAP at 5 cmH2O delivered by the variable generator WhisperFlow System. The FiO2 will be adjusted in order to obtain a SpO2 between 92% and 98% in hypoxemic patients and between 88% and 95% in hypercapnic patients.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Mechanical ventilation \> 48 hours and
* high risk for extubation failure namely , congestive heart failure, ineffective cough and excessive tracheobronchial secretions, more than one failure of a weaning trial, more than one co-morbid condition, patients who had hypercapnia, and upper airway obstruction without immediately required intubation

Exclusion Criteria

* age\<18 years
* pregnancy
* tracheostomy
* uncontrolled cardiac ischemia or arrhythmias
* unstable hemodynamic status
* documented swallowing problem
* documented cervical spine injury
* Facial anatomical abnormalities interfering with the mask fit
* agitated or uncooperative state
* lack of informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ramathibodi Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pongdhep Theerawit

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ramathibodi Hospital

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Pongdhep Theerawit, MD

Role: CONTACT

662011619

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Pongdhep Theerawit, MD

Role: primary

662011619

Yuda Sutherasan, MD

Role: backup

662011619

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Maggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, Montini L, De Gaetano A, Navalesi P, Antonelli M. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;190(3):282-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25003980 (View on PubMed)

Nava S, Gregoretti C, Fanfulla F, Squadrone E, Grassi M, Carlucci A, Beltrame F, Navalesi P. Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients. Crit Care Med. 2005 Nov;33(11):2465-70. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000186416.44752.72.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16276167 (View on PubMed)

Glover GW, Fletcher SJ. Assessing the performance of the Whisperflow continuous positive airway pressure generator: a bench study. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):875-81. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep077. Epub 2009 Apr 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19380311 (View on PubMed)

Coplin WM, Pierson DJ, Cooley KD, Newell DW, Rubenfeld GD. Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 May;161(5):1530-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9905102.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10806150 (View on PubMed)

Nava S, Hill N. Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Lancet. 2009 Jul 18;374(9685):250-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60496-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19616722 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ID 12-58-11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.