Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus High Frequency Jet Ventilation for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia
NCT04774848
Non-Invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Conventional Ventilation for Preterm Neonates.
NCT07307079
Non-Invasive Ventilation Versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Cardiogenic Pulmonary Edema: a Multicentre Study
NCT00785174
Physiological Effects of Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation Versus High-flow Nasal Cannula in Critically Ill Patients At High Risk of Extubation Failure
NCT05012696
High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy With or Without NIV During the Weaning Period
NCT03121482
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Nasal CPAP has been shown to improve the success rate of extubation from mechanical ventilation by preventing post extubation atelectasis with resultant improvements in gas exchange. However in many of the most premature infants, poorly developed control of respiratory drive is a major problem and despite treatment with caffeine, mechanical ventilation is needed. High frequency nasal ventilation may support ventilation enough during apneic periods to mitigate the need for traditional mechanical ventilation. Use of non-invasive modes may result in a decrease in the incidence and or severity of chronic lung problems and developmental disability of this group of infants.
Extremely premature infants (GA \<28 weeks) less than 7 days old will be randomized to either NHFV or nCPAP following the first attempt at extubation and removal from mechanical ventilation. All infants will have received at least a loading dose of caffeine citrate (10 mg/kg of caffeine base equivalent prior to extubation. Initial nCPAP level will be determined by clinical staff but will be at least equal to the level of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) used during mechanical ventilation. A similar level of pressure will be used as initial mean airway pressure (MAP) in infants receiving HFNV.
The primary outcome will be need for reintubation during the first 7 days after extubation attempt due to preset criteria. Crossover to the other modality will not be allowed during this period. Infants may remain on HFNF beyond the 7 day primary endpoint if deemed necessary by the clinical staff. Weaning of HFNV to nCPAP will be allowed during the 7 day primary study period and reinstitution of HFNF will be allowed for those initially randomized to that mode of respiratory support.
The magnitude of the effect size cannot be determined as there are no studies to base a sample size calculation on. A pragmatic sample size of 20 infants was selected (10 in each arm) to allow estimation of any potential effect size. Further study(ies) will need to be performed to show conclusively efficacy (or lack) of NHFV to prevent post-extubation respiratory failure or its use in preventing chronic lung disease or improving developmental outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Nasal CPAP
Nasal CPAP using Infant flow
CPAP
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation using Infant Flow CPAP machine
NHFOV
Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation using Dräger Babylog® VN500 ventilator machine
NHFOV
Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CPAP
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation using Infant Flow CPAP machine
NHFOV
Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Intubated and ventilated in the first 24 hours of life
* Extubated in the first week of life
* Parental consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Major congenital malformation
* Severe perinatal asphyxia
* Airway abnormalities
* Pneumothorax
15 Minutes
7 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Manitoba
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Yaser Ali
Fellow, Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ronald J Baier, M.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
HSC Neonatology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Boniface General Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Health Sciences Center, NICU
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B2013: 040
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.