NHFOV Versus NCPAP to Prevent Exubation Failure

NCT ID: NCT01852916

Last Updated: 2015-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

SUSPENDED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to assess whether nasal high frequency ventilation (NHFV) is superior to nasal continuous positive pressure (nCPAP) to prevent tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in preterm infants less than 28 weeks gestation following first attempt at extubation and removal from mechanical ventilation

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Extremely preterm infants frequently need to be placed back on invasive mechanical ventilation following initial attempts to remove them from this mode of respiratory support. Continued mechanical ventilation is thought to be the primary driver in the development of chronic lung disease and a major component in adverse developmental outcome of these infants. Infants fail their first trial of removal from ventilation because of apnea and respiratory failure. Animal studies and early clinical experience suggest that it is possible to effectively provide ventilation via high frequency nasal ventilation. In the animal models this mode of ventilation appears to provide for better lung development and less injury.

Nasal CPAP has been shown to improve the success rate of extubation from mechanical ventilation by preventing post extubation atelectasis with resultant improvements in gas exchange. However in many of the most premature infants, poorly developed control of respiratory drive is a major problem and despite treatment with caffeine, mechanical ventilation is needed. High frequency nasal ventilation may support ventilation enough during apneic periods to mitigate the need for traditional mechanical ventilation. Use of non-invasive modes may result in a decrease in the incidence and or severity of chronic lung problems and developmental disability of this group of infants.

Extremely premature infants (GA \<28 weeks) less than 7 days old will be randomized to either NHFV or nCPAP following the first attempt at extubation and removal from mechanical ventilation. All infants will have received at least a loading dose of caffeine citrate (10 mg/kg of caffeine base equivalent prior to extubation. Initial nCPAP level will be determined by clinical staff but will be at least equal to the level of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) used during mechanical ventilation. A similar level of pressure will be used as initial mean airway pressure (MAP) in infants receiving HFNV.

The primary outcome will be need for reintubation during the first 7 days after extubation attempt due to preset criteria. Crossover to the other modality will not be allowed during this period. Infants may remain on HFNF beyond the 7 day primary endpoint if deemed necessary by the clinical staff. Weaning of HFNV to nCPAP will be allowed during the 7 day primary study period and reinstitution of HFNF will be allowed for those initially randomized to that mode of respiratory support.

The magnitude of the effect size cannot be determined as there are no studies to base a sample size calculation on. A pragmatic sample size of 20 infants was selected (10 in each arm) to allow estimation of any potential effect size. Further study(ies) will need to be performed to show conclusively efficacy (or lack) of NHFV to prevent post-extubation respiratory failure or its use in preventing chronic lung disease or improving developmental outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Nasal CPAP

Nasal CPAP using Infant flow

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CPAP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation using Infant Flow CPAP machine

NHFOV

Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation using Dräger Babylog® VN500 ventilator machine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

NHFOV

Intervention Type DEVICE

Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CPAP

Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation using Infant Flow CPAP machine

Intervention Type DEVICE

NHFOV

Nasal High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Newborn less than 28 weeks gestation at birth
* Intubated and ventilated in the first 24 hours of life
* Extubated in the first week of life
* Parental consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Lack of parental consent
* Major congenital malformation
* Severe perinatal asphyxia
* Airway abnormalities
* Pneumothorax
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Minutes

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Manitoba

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Yaser Ali

Fellow, Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ronald J Baier, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

HSC Neonatology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St. Boniface General Hospital

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Health Sciences Center, NICU

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B2013: 040

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.