Non-Invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Conventional Ventilation for Preterm Neonates.
NCT ID: NCT07307079
Last Updated: 2025-12-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-01
2025-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Difference Between Non-invasive High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Non-invasive Continuous Airway Pressure Ventilation in COVID-19 With Acute Hypoxemia
NCT05706467
Rescue High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Newborns Who Do Not Respond to Conventional Ventilation
NCT02752438
NHFOV Versus NCPAP to Prevent Exubation Failure
NCT01852916
Ventilatory Parameters and Inflammatory Responses of Neonates Ventilated by Different Modes of Ventilation
NCT01514331
Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial of Two Protocols for Weaning From High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation in Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome Admitted in the NICU of Mansoura University Children Hospital
NCT07202299
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Non-Invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Group
Neonates were managed using a high-frequency oscillatory ventilator with a noninvasive nasal interface. Ventilator settings were adjusted to a mean airway pressure (MAP) of 8-12 cmH₂O, a frequency of 10 Hz, an amplitude adjusted to maintain optimal chest vibration, and an FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ between 90-94%.
Non-Invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation
Neonates were managed using a high-frequency oscillatory ventilator with a noninvasive nasal interface. Ventilator settings were adjusted to a mean airway pressure (MAP) of 8-12 cmH₂O, a frequency of 10 Hz, an amplitude adjusted to maintain optimal chest vibration, and an FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ between 90-94%.
Conventional Ventilation Group
Neonates received invasive ventilation through an endotracheal tube. Settings were adjusted to an initial tidal volume of 4-6 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 4-6 cmH₂O, a respiratory rate of 30-50 breaths per minute, and FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ between 90-94%.
Conventional Mechanical Ventilation
Neonates received invasive ventilation through an endotracheal tube. Settings were adjusted to an initial tidal volume of 4-6 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 4-6 cmH₂O, a respiratory rate of 30-50 breaths per minute, and FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ between 90-94%.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Non-Invasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation
Neonates were managed using a high-frequency oscillatory ventilator with a noninvasive nasal interface. Ventilator settings were adjusted to a mean airway pressure (MAP) of 8-12 cmH₂O, a frequency of 10 Hz, an amplitude adjusted to maintain optimal chest vibration, and an FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ between 90-94%.
Conventional Mechanical Ventilation
Neonates received invasive ventilation through an endotracheal tube. Settings were adjusted to an initial tidal volume of 4-6 mL/kg, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 4-6 cmH₂O, a respiratory rate of 30-50 breaths per minute, and FiO₂ titrated to maintain SpO₂ between 90-94%.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Gestational age between 26 and 36 weeks
* Diagnosed with RDS.
* Failed to respond to nCPAP treatment
Exclusion Criteria
* Early onset sepsis at the time of enrollment
1 Day
28 Days
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Muhammad Aamir Latif
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Muhammad Aamir Latif
Research Consultant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Muhammad Farhan, FCPS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indus Hospital - Recep Tayyip Erdogan Campus, Muzaffargarh
Athar Razzaq, FCPS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Indus Hospital - Recep Tayyip Erdogan Campus, Muzaffargarh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Indus Hospital - Recep Tayyip Erdogan Campus, Muzaffargarh
Muzaffargarh, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DR-FARHAN-INDUS-HOSPITAL
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.