A Trial Comparing Approaches to Shared Decision Making Skills Training for Clinicians
NCT ID: NCT02871739
Last Updated: 2019-02-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2016-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of a Web-Based Interactive Patient Decision Aid for the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain and Depression
NCT00525811
Checklist-guided Shared Decision-making for Code Status Discussions in Medical Inpatients.
NCT03872154
CSDM: A Trial to Improve Communication and Shared Decision Making Using a Web-Based Tool
NCT02955563
RCT Regarding SDM Online Training and Face-to-face SDM Training
NCT02674360
Evaluation of a Decision Aid About Life-sustaining Therapies
NCT04034979
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Group 1: Decision aid viewing with feedback Group 2: Decision aid viewing and no feedback Group 3: webinar with feedback Group 4: webinar and no feedback
The pilot study will provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness and feasibility on training formats to determine if:
* Clinicians improved in SDM communication skills
* Clinicians have an increased confidence to use SDM with their patients
* The training is acceptable to clinicians
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DA viewing with SPI Feedback
Group 1 receives three decision aids and feedback on their standardized patient (SPI) interaction rating their shared decision making skills and highlighting opportunities for improvement.
DA viewing
Participants will receive 3 decisions aids to review.
SPI feedback
Rating of shared decision making skills and opportunities for improvement based on transcript of a standardized patient interaction
DA viewing with no SPI Feedback
Group 2 receives three decision aids. This group does not receive any feedback from the SPI.
DA viewing
Participants will receive 3 decisions aids to review.
Webinar with SPI Feedback
Group 3 receives an online, interactive webinar that focuses on SDM skills in clinical encounters and feedback on their standardized patient (SPI) interaction rating their shared decision making skills and highlighting opportunities for improvement.
Webinar
1 hour online, interactive webinar that covers shared decision making skills in clinical encounters.
SPI feedback
Rating of shared decision making skills and opportunities for improvement based on transcript of a standardized patient interaction
Webinar with no SPI Feedback
Group 4 receives an online, interactive webinar that focuses on SDM skills in clinical encounters. This group does not receive any feedback from the SPI.
Webinar
1 hour online, interactive webinar that covers shared decision making skills in clinical encounters.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Webinar
1 hour online, interactive webinar that covers shared decision making skills in clinical encounters.
DA viewing
Participants will receive 3 decisions aids to review.
SPI feedback
Rating of shared decision making skills and opportunities for improvement based on transcript of a standardized patient interaction
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* English speaking
* Physician
* Nurse Practitioner
* Physician Assistant
* Registered Nurse
Exclusion Criteria
* Medical Trainees
* Medical Students
* Medical Assistants
* Social Workers
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Partners HealthCare
OTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Karen Sepucha
Director Health Decision Sciences Center
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Karen Sepucha, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Legare F, Stacey D, Turcotte S, Cossi MJ, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID, Lyddiatt A, Politi MC, Thomson R, Elwyn G, Donner-Banzhoff N. Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 15;(9):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub3.
Davis D. Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1998;28(1):21-39. doi: 10.2190/UA3R-JX9W-MHR5-RC81.
Price EL, Bereknyei S, Kuby A, Levinson W, Braddock CH 3rd. New elements for informed decision making: a qualitative study of older adults' views. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.006. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016P000470
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.