Checklist-guided Shared Decision-making for Code Status Discussions in Medical Inpatients.
NCT ID: NCT03872154
Last Updated: 2024-03-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2663 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-13
2023-04-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Trial Comparing Approaches to Shared Decision Making Skills Training for Clinicians
NCT02871739
Impact of a Decision Aid on Patient Decision Making in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients
NCT01077037
CSDM: A Trial to Improve Communication and Shared Decision Making Using a Web-Based Tool
NCT02955563
Coaching Doctors in Ethical Decision-making (CODE)
NCT05167019
Development of a Web-Based Interactive Patient Decision Aid for the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain and Depression
NCT00525811
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
In this group (intervention), physicians will conduct checklist-guided shared decision making to determine the patient's code status. Additionally, physicians will be given a decision aid, which they are told to use to illustrate impact and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrests.
Ancillary project (patients considered as futile): In this group (intervention), physicians will conduct checklist-guided communication.
Checklist-guided shared decision-making
Physicians will receive a checklist and a decision aid for shared decision-making during code status discussion.
Ancillary project: Physicians will receive a checklist to communicate the futility.
Usual Care
In this group (control), physicians will conduct code status discussions as usually.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Checklist-guided shared decision-making
Physicians will receive a checklist and a decision aid for shared decision-making during code status discussion.
Ancillary project: Physicians will receive a checklist to communicate the futility.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
\- residents on the medical wards will be the primary level of randomization.
2. patient level - any adult (\>18 years) patient that is admitted for in-hospital care will be eligible.
Exclusion Criteria
2. patient level
* patients unable to complete questionnaires or unable to follow code status discussions due to (1) intoxication, (2) paracusis; (3) serious psychiatric conditions (e.g., psychosis, depression with suicidal tendency, stupor), (4) cognitive impairment (e.g. dementia, delirium).
* patients prior included in this study (i.e., patients who are hospitalized for the second time)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Clinical Trial Unit, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
OTHER
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sabina Hunziker, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospial Basel
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Universitätsspital Basel
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Arpagaus A, Arpagaus L, Becker C, Gross S, Gossi F, Bissmann B, Zumbrunn SK, Schuetz P, Leuppi JD, Aujesky D, Hug B, Peters T, Bassetti S, Hunziker S. Checklist-Guided Code Status Discussions in Patients for Whom Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Is Considered Futile: An Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2533638. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.33638.
Becker C, Gross S, Beck K, Amacher SA, Vincent A, Mueller J, Loretz N, Blatter R, Bohren C, Urben T, Arpagaus A, Schaefert R, Schuetz P, Kaegi-Braun N, Stalder L, Leuppi JD, Aujesky D, Baumgartner C, Hug B, Schmieg H, Delfine V, Peters T, Templeton AJ, Bassetti S, Hunziker S. A Randomized Trial of Shared Decision-Making in Code Status Discussions. NEJM Evid. 2025 May;4(5):EVIDoa2400422. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2400422. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Code status 2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.