Basic Care Revisited_Communication for Patient Participation

NCT ID: NCT02401919

Last Updated: 2015-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

175 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

COMMUNICATION - Feasibility and effectiveness 'Tell-us Cards' in hospital patients

* Objective - To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of 'Tell-us Cards' on patient participation in basic care in hospital settings.
* Design - Cluster randomised controlled early trial design (Phase 2B, MRC Framework). Patients of two surgical and two medical wards (n=140) will be included in this study. Before and after the introduction of the intervention, assessments will take place in patients and nurses at these wards.
* Intervention - The 'Tell-us card' is a tool to elicit patients preferences and needs in basic care. Patients are invited to write down their specific questions and concerns. The cards are handed out to patients admitted to the hospital (daily). Patients and informal caregivers are invited to use the cards to state their preferences. Nurses are instructed to use the cards as a tool in their dialogue with the patient in making care plans, during ward rounds or for discharge information sessions.
* Comparison - Usual care
* Primary outcome - Patient perception of participation in care (Individualized Care Scale (ICS)
* Secondary - Use and content of the 'Tell-us Cards' actions taken by nurses as a consequence of what patients 'tell them' by means of the 'Tell-us Cards', Quality from the Patients' perspective (QPP), EQ-5D, and CQ satisfaction with communication \& care in general

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Feasibility and effectiveness of the 'Tell-us Card' Communication Tool on hospital patients' perception of participation and quality of Care.

The use of 'Tell-us Cards' in basic care is an intervention facilitating communication for enhanced patient participation in basic care. The effectiveness of the card is tested by Jangland et al (18) in a population of patients admitted to the hospitals surgical wards. The use of the 'Tell-us Card' in this patient group resulted in significant improvements in patients abilities to participate in decisions about their nursing and medical care. In our study we will investigate feasibility and effectiveness of the 'Tell-us cards' in three different hospital settings; patients admitted to the hospitals' surgical and medical wards and in patients attending the hospitals' emergency department.

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate feasibility and effectiveness of 'Tell-us Cards' for patients participation in basic care in three different hospital settings. Description of the Intervention: The 'Tell-us card' (18) is a tool to elicit patients preferences and needs in basic care. Patients are invited to write down their specific questions and concerns for the day or before discharge. 'Tell-us Cards' are handed out on a daily basis to patients admitted to the hospital. Patients and their informal caregivers are invited to use the 'Tell-us Card' to state their preferences in basic care during their stay in the hospital. Nurses are instructed to use the 'Tell-us card' as a tool in their dialogue with the patient in making care plans, during ward rounds or for discharge information sessions.

Design: Feasibility and effectiveness of the 'Tell-us Card' will be tested in a controlled early trial design (Phase 2B, MRC Framework). Trained nurses will be handing out the 'Tell-us Cards' on a daily basis to patients admitted to the hospital. Baseline assessments on patient participation will be conducted at all wards in patients and nurses before the introduction of the 'Tell-us Cards'. For the baseline assessment; Nurses and patients will be asked to fill in a questionnaire. The nurses receive a questionnaire in their postbox at the ward they are working on with an envelope for returning the questionnaire to the researcher. Patients will be asked to fill in a questionnaire one week after discharge from the hospital or one week after their visit to the emergency department. Assessment of effects of the intervention in patients at T1 will start 3 months after the introduction of the 'Tell-us Cards' at the intervention wards. Nurses will be asked to fill in the questionnaire again 6 months after they filled in the first questionnaire.

Patients \& Settings: Hospital patients admitted to two surgical wards and two medical wards (n=4x35=140) will be included in this study. One surgical ward, one medical ward will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control group. Baseline and follow up assessments will take place in 35 patients per assessment per ward, resulting in 165 assessments at baseline, and 165 assessments at follow-up. Outcomes: Primary outcome is patient perception of participation in individualised care. For measurement of patient participation in patients admitted to the hospital we will use the Individualized Care Scale for patients (19-23). Secondary outcomes will comprehend perception of quality of care, assessed with the Quality from the Patients' perspective (QPP) questionnaire (24, 25) as well as the use and content of the 'Tell-us Cards' and the actions taken by nurses as a consequence of what patients 'tell them' by means of the 'Tell-us Cards'. As generic tools we will use the EQ-5D for measurement of Quality of life (www.euroqol.org) and one question from the consumer Quality index for patient experience (www.centrumklantervaringindezorg). Furthermore nurses' perception of individualised care will be assessed at baseline and follow-up with the Individualized Care Scale for nurses.

Analysis: Results are clustered at ward level. We will therefore perform a random effects regression model to estimate the effects on (surgical and medical) patients' perceptions of Individualised Care for the intervention versus the usual care group at follow-up. In this analysis, ward will be entered as random effect, and covariates in the model are patients' perceptions of Individualised Care at each ward at baseline.

Descriptive analysis will reveal the topics patients regard as most important during their stay. A thorough process analysis on the use of the Card en the actions taken as a consequence of the content of the cards, will give insight in feasibility and effectiveness of the 'Tell-us Card' in daily practice.

Timeline (21 months): 1-6 (6m):Preparation time; 7-9 (3m):T0-Baseline assessment; 10-12 (3m):'Tell-us Card' Intervention Introduction; 13-15 (3m):T1-assessment; 16-21 (6m):Data analysis and study reporting

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Communication Patient Participation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tell-us Card Intervention

Patients in the experimental arm will receive a Tell-us Card on a daily basis during their stay in the hospital. With this card patients are invited to state what is important to them for that day or before discharge from the ward.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tell-us Card

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients will be invited on a daily basis, during their stay in the hospital, to state what is important for them at that moment or before discharge

Care as usual

In the control arm, patients will receive care as usual.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tell-us Card

Patients will be invited on a daily basis, during their stay in the hospital, to state what is important for them at that moment or before discharge

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Speaking the Dutch language

Exclusion Criteria

* No serious cognitive impairments
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Radboud University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ria Nijhuis-van der Sande, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Radboud University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Radboud university medical center

Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis

's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, Netherlands

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Maud Heinen, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+31 (0)24 3619750

Getty Huisman-deWaal, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+31 (0)24 3619750

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Riny van der Ven

Role: primary

Joost van de Mortel

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jangland E, Carlsson M, Lundgren E, Gunningberg L. The impact of an intervention to improve patient participation in a surgical care unit: a quasi-experimental study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 May;49(5):528-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.10.024. Epub 2011 Nov 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22104043 (View on PubMed)

Suhonen R, Schmidt LA, Katajisto J, Berg A, Idvall E, Kalafati M, Land L, Lemonidou C, Valimaki M, Leino-Kilpi H. Cross-cultural validity of the Individualised Care Scale - a Rasch model analysis. J Clin Nurs. 2013 Mar;22(5-6):648-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04238.x. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22882146 (View on PubMed)

Suhonen R, Gustafsson ML, Katajisto J, Valimaki M, Leino-Kilpi H. Nurses' perceptions of individualized care. J Adv Nurs. 2010 May;66(5):1035-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05256.x. Epub 2010 Mar 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20337793 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

520002003

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Nurse Caring Communication Engagement
NCT07136350 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Communication During Hospitalization About Resuscitation Trial
NCT02984124 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
Proactive Health Support
NCT03628469 COMPLETED NA