Implementing Shared Decision Making (SDM) For Individualized CV Prevention (SDM4IP)
NCT ID: NCT04450914
Last Updated: 2025-05-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
112127 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-05-10
2025-04-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Trial Comparing Approaches to Shared Decision Making Skills Training for Clinicians
NCT02871739
Impact of a Decision Aid on Patient Decision Making in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients
NCT01077037
Treatment Decisions for Multi-vessel CAD
NCT02611050
Shared Decision-making: Effects on Cardiac Risk Factor Modification Behavior
NCT00714935
Communicating Multiple Disease Risks
NCT02621671
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The challenge therefore is to identify strategies to increase adoption of this type of SDM in real-world clinical practices. This 4-year study - proposed by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in preventive cardiology, SDM, and implementation science - aims to integrate an SDM tool (the CV Prevention Choice tool) in the primary care practices of three diverse health care systems in the U.S. and study both the tool and tailored strategies that foster its adoption and routine use. The study will use a mixed method, hybrid implementation-effectiveness (Type III) step-wedge clustered randomized trial design to determine:
* Implementation effectiveness (Aim 1) by evaluating the settings (including local workflow and policies) in which the CV Prevention Choice tool is implemented and the engagement of users in implementation strategies; implementation outcomes (e.g., reach, adoption) associated with these strategies; and how implementation fosters routine adoption of SDM and the CV Prevention Choice tool in primary care practices, and
* SDM effectiveness (Aim 2) estimated by the extent to which individual CV prevention plans are feasible and congruent with each person's estimated CV risk and preferences.
The investigators hypothesize that efforts to assess local needs and use them to develop tailored implementation approaches will foster greater adoption of SDM in practice. They further hypothesize that individual preventive care plans will be congruent with estimated risk when clinicians adopt the SDM tool. The broad goal is to promote patient-centered care that effectively reduces the substantial burden of CV disease among Americans. By the project's end, the investigators expect to have (a) identified the most effective implementation strategies to embed SDM in routine practice and (b) estimated the effectiveness of SDM to achieve feasible and risk-concordant CV prevention in primary care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Health Systems - First Step
Each health system will consist of clinicians who are affiliated with primary care practices and patients who are eligible for CV primary prevention discussions. In the first step, health systems will be assigned to usual care (passive implementation of CV Prevention Choice).
CV Prevention Choice Tool
The CV Prevention Choice SDM tool is a shared decision making intervention. It is embedded in the electronic health record and uses EHR data to estimate and display cardiovascular risk for individual patients and then foster conversations between clinicians and patients about available options for preventive care based on individual risk and preferences.
Health Systems - Second Step
Each health system will consist of clinicians who are affiliated with primary care practices and patients who are eligible for CV primary prevention discussions. In the second step, health systems (in an order to be determined by randomization and staggered over time) will move into active implementation.
CV Prevention Choice Tool
The CV Prevention Choice SDM tool is a shared decision making intervention. It is embedded in the electronic health record and uses EHR data to estimate and display cardiovascular risk for individual patients and then foster conversations between clinicians and patients about available options for preventive care based on individual risk and preferences.
Implementation Facilitation Strategies
During the active implementation stage, health systems will deploy tailored implementation facilitation and other tailored implementation strategies aimed at increasing adoption and use of shared decision making using CV Prevention Choice.
Health Systems - Third Step
Each health system will consist of clinicians who are affiliated with primary care practices and patients who are eligible for CV primary prevention discussions.In the third step, all health systems will move to maintenance implementation.
CV Prevention Choice Tool
The CV Prevention Choice SDM tool is a shared decision making intervention. It is embedded in the electronic health record and uses EHR data to estimate and display cardiovascular risk for individual patients and then foster conversations between clinicians and patients about available options for preventive care based on individual risk and preferences.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CV Prevention Choice Tool
The CV Prevention Choice SDM tool is a shared decision making intervention. It is embedded in the electronic health record and uses EHR data to estimate and display cardiovascular risk for individual patients and then foster conversations between clinicians and patients about available options for preventive care based on individual risk and preferences.
Implementation Facilitation Strategies
During the active implementation stage, health systems will deploy tailored implementation facilitation and other tailored implementation strategies aimed at increasing adoption and use of shared decision making using CV Prevention Choice.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient Participants: Adult patients (ages 40-75 years) with or without diabetes who have not experienced an atherothrombotic clinical event and receive preventive care at a participating primary care practice will be eligible to participate.
Exclusion Criteria
40 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jennifer L. Ridgeway
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jennifer Ridgeway, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Victor Montori, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Wellstar Health System
Marietta, Georgia, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Altru Health System
Grand Forks, North Dakota, United States
VHC Health
Arlington, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ridgeway JL, Branda ME, Gravholt D, Brito JP, Hargraves IG, Hartasanchez SA, Leppin AL, Gomez YL, Mann DM, Nautiyal V, Thomas RJ, Behnken EM, Torres Roldan VD, Shah ND, Khurana CS, Montori VM. Increasing risk-concordant cardiovascular care in diverse health systems: a mixed methods pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized implementation trial of shared decision making (SDM4IP). Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Apr 21;2(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00145-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20-002772
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.