Will Veterans Engage in Prevention After HRA-guided Shared Decision Making?
NCT ID: NCT01828567
Last Updated: 2018-09-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
417 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-10-01
2017-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Impact of Patient Involvement in Decision-Making About Heart Disease Prevention
NCT00315978
Tailored Communication to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk
NCT01286311
Vet-Harts Pilot Intervention for Veterans With Coronary Heart Disease
NCT01566214
Sharing and Talking About my Preferences
NCT03103828
Web-based Program to Improve Self-management Among Veterans-caregiver Dyads
NCT06001541
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators propose a two-site, two-arm randomized trial measuring the effectiveness of a Shared Decision Making (SDM) intervention in activating Veterans to enroll in effective prevention services, and improve cardiovascular risk, compared to Veterans Administration (VA) usual care. The study will be performed at the Durham and Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Medical Centers (VAMCs). Each arm will have 225 patients; patients will be VA users with at least one modifiable risk factor (obese, inactive, or tobacco user) who are not currently enrolled in a prevention service. The SDM intervention will be conducted by a prevention coach, telephone based, and will use the output from VHA's Healthy Living Assessment (HLA) to engage Veterans in a conversation where individual preferences are matched to behaviors, and choices for specific prevention services. The resulting prevention action plan will be shared with the Veterans primary care team, and documented in the medical record.
Outcomes will be obtained at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after enrollment by blinded research personnel. The primary outcomes will be: 1) proportion enrolled in effective prevention services; and 2) change in the Patient Activation Measure (PAM). The secondary outcome is 10-year risk of coronary events, as measured by Framingham Risk Score (FRS). Process evaluations of the intervention and its implementation will also be conducted to inform future dissemination and implementation should it prove effective.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach
A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT), and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
Control
Usual care
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach
A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT), and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* enrolled in primary care at the Durham or Ann Arbor Health Care Systems
* have one modifiable risk factor identified by a healthy living assessment (physical inactivity, overweight or obese by BMI, or tobacco user)
Exclusion Criteria
* have been hospitalized for a stroke, myocardial infarction or coronary artery revascularization in the past three months
* have an active diagnosis of psychosis
* have any other health condition they feel would impede participation in the study
* reside in a nursing home
* are severely impaired in hearing or speech, so that they cannot respond to telephone calls
* have significant cognitive or memory impairment
* do not have access to a telephone
* are participating in another prevention intervention study
* are already enrolled in a formal prevention service
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eugene Z. Oddone, MD MHSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Laura J. Damschroder, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Oddone EZ, Damschroder LJ, Gierisch J, Olsen M, Fagerlin A, Sanders L, Sparks J, Turner M, May C, McCant F, Curry D, White-Clark C, Juntilla K. A Coaching by Telephone Intervention for Veterans and Care Team Engagement (ACTIVATE): A study protocol for a Hybrid Type I effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;55:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
Oddone EZ, Gierisch JM, Sanders LL, Fagerlin A, Sparks J, McCant F, May C, Olsen MK, Damschroder LJ. A Coaching by Telephone Intervention on Engaging Patients to Address Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1487-1494. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4398-6. Epub 2018 May 7.
Olsen MK, Stechuchak KM, Hung A, Oddone EZ, Damschroder LJ, Edelman D, Maciejewski ML. A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Aug 13;19:100631. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100631. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Sloan C, Stechuchak KM, Olsen MK, Oddone EZ, Damschroder LJ, Maciejewski ML. Short-Term VA Health Care Expenditures Following a Health Risk Assessment and Coaching Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1452-1457. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05455-z. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
Nouri SS, Damschroder LJ, Olsen MK, Gierisch JM, Fagerlin A, Sanders LL, McCant F, Oddone EZ. Health Coaching Has Differential Effects on Veterans with Limited Health Literacy and Numeracy: a Secondary Analysis of ACTIVATE. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Apr;34(4):552-558. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04861-7. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRE 12-288
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.