Will Veterans Engage in Prevention After HRA-guided Shared Decision Making?

NCT ID: NCT01828567

Last Updated: 2018-09-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

417 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-01

Study Completion Date

2017-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The VA has committed to disseminate a web-based Healthy Living Assessment(HLA) tool and use it as the cornerstone of a personalized prevention plan to engage patients to improve their health behaviors that lead to high health risk. Health risk assessments done in isolation, however, do not generally lead to behavior change. Our study will test the effectiveness of a Shared Decision Making intervention designed to activate Veterans to enroll in effective prevention programs. The intervention will be conducted over the telephone, by a prevention coach, and will be linked to the patients' primary care team. The co-primary outcomes will be patient activation and patient enrollment in prevention programs; 10-year risk of major cardiac events will also be measured.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Over half of all deaths, and many illnesses, can be attributed to four modifiable risk factors: tobacco use, overweight/obesity, physical inactivity, and alcohol use. There are clear links between these modifiable factors and heart disease, cancer, chronic lung disease, and stroke which continue to be the leading causes of death in the United States. Significant improvements have been made in controlling conditions that lead to heart disease, cancer and stroke (e.g., hypertension and hyperlipidemia). However, the underlying behavioral factors (e.g., obesity, tobacco use, and physical inactivity) have not been addressed as well. Prevention is particularly important for Veterans because of the high prevalence of significant risk factors for poor health. For example, more than 70% of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) patients are overweight (body mass index \[BMI\] 25kg/m2) and one-third are obese (BMI 30kg/m2), which is significantly higher than the US population. Smoking also remains a significant problem among Veterans, with VHA enrollment data from 2010 indicating a prevalence of 20%. Younger Veterans are at particularly high risk for developing chronic illnesses because they are more likely to be overweight/obese and smoke more heavily than non-Veterans.

The investigators propose a two-site, two-arm randomized trial measuring the effectiveness of a Shared Decision Making (SDM) intervention in activating Veterans to enroll in effective prevention services, and improve cardiovascular risk, compared to Veterans Administration (VA) usual care. The study will be performed at the Durham and Ann Arbor Veterans Administration Medical Centers (VAMCs). Each arm will have 225 patients; patients will be VA users with at least one modifiable risk factor (obese, inactive, or tobacco user) who are not currently enrolled in a prevention service. The SDM intervention will be conducted by a prevention coach, telephone based, and will use the output from VHA's Healthy Living Assessment (HLA) to engage Veterans in a conversation where individual preferences are matched to behaviors, and choices for specific prevention services. The resulting prevention action plan will be shared with the Veterans primary care team, and documented in the medical record.

Outcomes will be obtained at baseline, 1 month and 6 months after enrollment by blinded research personnel. The primary outcomes will be: 1) proportion enrolled in effective prevention services; and 2) change in the Patient Activation Measure (PAM). The secondary outcome is 10-year risk of coronary events, as measured by Framingham Risk Score (FRS). Process evaluations of the intervention and its implementation will also be conducted to inform future dissemination and implementation should it prove effective.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Health Risk Appraisal Heart Disease Prevention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT), and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.

Control

Usual care

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach

A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT), and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

To be included in the study, patients must meet the following:

* enrolled in primary care at the Durham or Ann Arbor Health Care Systems
* have one modifiable risk factor identified by a healthy living assessment (physical inactivity, overweight or obese by BMI, or tobacco user)

Exclusion Criteria

Individuals will be excluded if they have any of the following:

* have been hospitalized for a stroke, myocardial infarction or coronary artery revascularization in the past three months
* have an active diagnosis of psychosis
* have any other health condition they feel would impede participation in the study
* reside in a nursing home
* are severely impaired in hearing or speech, so that they cannot respond to telephone calls
* have significant cognitive or memory impairment
* do not have access to a telephone
* are participating in another prevention intervention study
* are already enrolled in a formal prevention service
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eugene Z. Oddone, MD MHSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Laura J. Damschroder, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Oddone EZ, Damschroder LJ, Gierisch J, Olsen M, Fagerlin A, Sanders L, Sparks J, Turner M, May C, McCant F, Curry D, White-Clark C, Juntilla K. A Coaching by Telephone Intervention for Veterans and Care Team Engagement (ACTIVATE): A study protocol for a Hybrid Type I effectiveness-implementation randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 Apr;55:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.01.007. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 28126455 (View on PubMed)

Oddone EZ, Gierisch JM, Sanders LL, Fagerlin A, Sparks J, McCant F, May C, Olsen MK, Damschroder LJ. A Coaching by Telephone Intervention on Engaging Patients to Address Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1487-1494. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4398-6. Epub 2018 May 7.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29736750 (View on PubMed)

Olsen MK, Stechuchak KM, Hung A, Oddone EZ, Damschroder LJ, Edelman D, Maciejewski ML. A data-driven examination of which patients follow trial protocol. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Aug 13;19:100631. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100631. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32913914 (View on PubMed)

Sloan C, Stechuchak KM, Olsen MK, Oddone EZ, Damschroder LJ, Maciejewski ML. Short-Term VA Health Care Expenditures Following a Health Risk Assessment and Coaching Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1452-1457. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05455-z. Epub 2020 Jan 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31898118 (View on PubMed)

Nouri SS, Damschroder LJ, Olsen MK, Gierisch JM, Fagerlin A, Sanders LL, McCant F, Oddone EZ. Health Coaching Has Differential Effects on Veterans with Limited Health Literacy and Numeracy: a Secondary Analysis of ACTIVATE. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Apr;34(4):552-558. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04861-7. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30756302 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CRE 12-288

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Promoting Cholesterol Screening
NCT01930149 COMPLETED NA
Relational Playbook Pilot Study
NCT06456021 COMPLETED NA