Trial Outcomes & Findings for Will Veterans Engage in Prevention After HRA-guided Shared Decision Making? (NCT NCT01828567)
NCT ID: NCT01828567
Last Updated: 2018-09-10
Results Overview
Proportion of veterans enrolled in effective prevention services including weight loss, healthy eating, physical activity, and smoking cessation programs.
COMPLETED
NA
417 participants
1 and 6 months (cumulative)
2018-09-10
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Intervention
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach: A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to PACT, and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
|
Control
Usual care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
208
|
209
|
|
Overall Study
1 Month
|
172
|
192
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
177
|
199
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
31
|
10
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Intervention
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach: A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to PACT, and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
|
Control
Usual care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
27
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Excluded - did not meet criteria
|
4
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Will Veterans Engage in Prevention After HRA-guided Shared Decision Making?
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Intervention
n=208 Participants
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach: A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to PACT, and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
|
Control
n=209 Participants
Usual care
|
Total
n=417 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=5 Participants
|
56.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7 • n=7 Participants
|
55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
172 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
184 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
356 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
90 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
79 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
169 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
110 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
209 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
208 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
209 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
417 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 and 6 months (cumulative)Population: Unknowns were removed from the denominator: Intervention n=29; control n=15.
Proportion of veterans enrolled in effective prevention services including weight loss, healthy eating, physical activity, and smoking cessation programs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention
n=179 Participants
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach: A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to PACT, and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
|
Control
n=194 Participants
Usual care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Enrollment in Prevention Services
|
91 participants
|
56 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline assessmentPatient Activation Measures (PAM) assesses patients capacity to manage their health. Improvement in PAM scores indicate responsiveness to interventions and improvements in self-management behaviors. Minimum score is a zero and maximum is one hundred. Higher score is better. The protocol specifies co-primary outcomes with enrollment in prevention services specified as the most clinically relevant
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention
n=208 Participants
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach: A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to PACT, and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
|
Control
n=209 Participants
Usual care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Activation Measures (PAM)
|
62.4 average score
Standard Deviation 12.7
|
60.6 average score
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 month assessmentPatient Activation Measures (PAM) assesses patients capacity to manage their health. Improvement in PAM scores indicate responsiveness to interventions and improvements in self-management behaviors. Minimum score is a zero and maximum is one hundred. Higher score is better. The protocol specifies co-primary outcomes with enrollment in prevention services specified as the most clinically relevant
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention
n=172 Participants
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach: A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to PACT, and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
|
Control
n=192 Participants
Usual care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Activation Measures
|
63.7 average score
Standard Deviation 13.8
|
61.4 average score
Standard Deviation 11.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months assessmentsPatient Activation Measures (PAM) assesses patients capacity to manage their health. Improvement in PAM scores indicate responsiveness to interventions and improvements in self-management behaviors. Minimum score is a zero and maximum is one hundred. Higher score is better. The protocol specifies co-primary outcomes with enrollment in prevention services specified as the most clinically relevant
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention
n=177 Participants
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach: A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to PACT, and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
|
Control
n=199 Participants
Usual care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Activation Measures
|
67.0 average score
Standard Deviation 13.0
|
63.2 average score
Standard Deviation 13.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: Unknowns were removed from the denominator: Intervention n=7; control n=2.
The Framingham Risk Score is a gender-specific algorithm used to estimate the 10-year cardiovascular risk of an individual. This is not a scale however, lower score indicates less risk.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention
n=201 Participants
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach: A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to PACT, and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
|
Control
n=207 Participants
Usual care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Framingham Risk Score
|
21.8 average score
Standard Deviation 16.8
|
22.7 average score
Standard Deviation 16.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 monthsPopulation: Unknowns were removed from the denominator: Intervention n=22; control n=18.
The Framingham Risk Score is a gender-specific algorithm used to estimate the 10-year cardiovascular risk of an individual. This is not a scale however, lower score indicates less risk.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intervention
n=155 Participants
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach: A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to PACT, and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
|
Control
n=181 Participants
Usual care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Framingham Risk Score
|
22.4 average score
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
22.5 average score
Standard Deviation 16.3
|
Adverse Events
Intervention
Control
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Intervention
n=208 participants at risk
Primary care phone-based prevention coaching using shared decision making following a Healthy Living Assessment
Shared decision making with a Prevention Coach: A series of two phone sessions with a prevention coach. The first to engage the veteran to choose a preferred prevention program and link them to PACT, and a follow-up call one month later to assess the progress of the prevention plan.
|
Control
n=209 participants at risk
Usual care
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Study Safety Protocol
|
0.48%
1/208 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.00%
0/209 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/208 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.96%
2/209 • Number of events 2 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Study Safety Protocol
|
1.9%
4/208 • Number of events 4 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.96%
2/209 • Number of events 2 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.96%
2/208 • Number of events 2 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.00%
0/209 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Important Medical Event
|
0.48%
1/208 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.00%
0/209 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/208 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.48%
1/209 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.00%
0/208 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.48%
1/209 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
General disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.48%
1/208 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.00%
0/209 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.96%
2/208 • Number of events 2 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.00%
0/209 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Investigations
Protocol Deviation
|
21.6%
45/208 • Number of events 45 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
17.2%
36/209 • Number of events 36 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.48%
1/208 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.48%
1/209 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
0.00%
0/208 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
1.4%
3/209 • Number of events 3 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Important Medical Event
|
0.48%
1/208 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
1.4%
3/209 • Number of events 3 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Important Medical Event
|
0.96%
2/208 • Number of events 2 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.48%
1/209 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Hospitalization
|
2.4%
5/208 • Number of events 5 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.96%
2/209 • Number of events 2 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Important Medical Event
|
0.48%
1/208 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.00%
0/209 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Emergency Room Visit
|
0.48%
1/208 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.00%
0/209 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hospitalization
|
0.96%
2/208 • Number of events 2 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
1.4%
3/209 • Number of events 3 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Important Medical Event
|
0.48%
1/208 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.00%
0/209 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Hospitalization
|
0.48%
1/208 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
0.48%
1/209 • Number of events 1 • Through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Adverse events information was collected from participants if they reported events at the 1 month and 6 month outcome assessments. Adverse event information was also collected from patients through contact with the coach interventionist or if during updating of clinical records it was discovered that an adverse event had occurred with a patient. Adverse events were monitored/assessed without regard to the specific Adverse Event Terms.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Eugene Z Oddone, MD, MPSc
Durham VA Center of Innovation in Primary Care
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place