Effect of Patient Priorities Care Implementation in Older Veterans With Multiple Chronic Conditions
NCT ID: NCT04922320
Last Updated: 2025-12-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
420 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-15
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patient Priorities Care
A facilitator will schedule a PPC facilitation encounter 2-3 weeks before an upcoming PCP visit. The facilitator conducts a structured assessment using a written conversation guide that begins with general questions establishing what is most important to Veterans about their health and moves toward establishing specific goals (actionable outcomes), and what patients are willing/not willing to do to achieve these goals (care preferences). The result is a structured patient priorities report delivered to PCPs designed to facilitate changes in the patient's care plan to align it with his/her priorities. In the subsequent visit, the PCP will use one or more of the established PPC decisional strategies to align care with patients' priorities. Education for PCPs about the facilitation process, the patient priorities report, and the decisional strategies occurs prior to the PCP seeing any intervention patients. The PCP will document changes in care made to achieve the identified priorities.
Patient Priorities Care
A facilitator will schedule a PPC facilitation encounter 2-3 weeks before an upcoming PCP visit. The facilitator conducts a structured assessment using a written conversation guide that begins with general questions establishing what is most important to Veterans about their health and moves toward establishing specific goals (actionable outcomes), and what patients are willing/not willing to do to achieve these goals (care preferences). The result is a structured patient priorities report delivered to PCPs designed to facilitate changes in the patient's care plan to align it with his/her priorities. In the subsequent visit, the PCP will use one or more of the established PPC decisional strategies to align care with patients' priorities. Education for PCPs about the facilitation process, the patient priorities report, and the decisional strategies occurs prior to the PCP seeing any intervention patients. The PCP will document changes in care made to achieve the identified priorities.
Usual Care
PCPs will not be alerted when an encounter involves a UC group participant. UC participant visits will appear the same as all other unenrolled patient encounters. UC participants will not receive any additional preparation
Usual Care
PCPs will not be alerted when an encounter involves a UC group participant. UC participant visits will appear the same as all other unenrolled patient encounters. PCPs will be trained to address the needs of UC participants based on their typical approach without the use of a facilitator or explicit process for identifying patient priorities. UC participants will not receive any additional preparation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient Priorities Care
A facilitator will schedule a PPC facilitation encounter 2-3 weeks before an upcoming PCP visit. The facilitator conducts a structured assessment using a written conversation guide that begins with general questions establishing what is most important to Veterans about their health and moves toward establishing specific goals (actionable outcomes), and what patients are willing/not willing to do to achieve these goals (care preferences). The result is a structured patient priorities report delivered to PCPs designed to facilitate changes in the patient's care plan to align it with his/her priorities. In the subsequent visit, the PCP will use one or more of the established PPC decisional strategies to align care with patients' priorities. Education for PCPs about the facilitation process, the patient priorities report, and the decisional strategies occurs prior to the PCP seeing any intervention patients. The PCP will document changes in care made to achieve the identified priorities.
Usual Care
PCPs will not be alerted when an encounter involves a UC group participant. UC participant visits will appear the same as all other unenrolled patient encounters. PCPs will be trained to address the needs of UC participants based on their typical approach without the use of a facilitator or explicit process for identifying patient priorities. UC participants will not receive any additional preparation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 3 active health problems on active problem list or prescribed 10 medications
Exclusion Criteria
* end stage renal disease on dialysis
* active serious mental illness (psychosis, schizophrenia, etc)
* active substance use disorder
* complete hearing loss
* dementia
* Non-English speaker (translator required)
* 4 or more no-show appointments in the last 6 months
* the investigators will present a list of eligible patients to PCPs prior to chart review to identify patients who the PCP:
* a) believes cannot participate independently or provide informed consent due to cognitive impairment
* b) "would not be surprised if the patient passed away within the next 12 months?"
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lilian N. Dindo, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT
West Haven, Connecticut, United States
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Chary A, Hernandez N, Rivera AP, Ramont V, Obi T, Santangelo I, Ritchie C, Singh H, Hayden E, Naik AD, Liu S, Kennedy M. Perceptions of Acute Care Telemedicine Among Caregivers for Persons Living with Dementia: A Qualitative Study. J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Jan;43(1):69-77. doi: 10.1177/07334648231198018. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
Cohen AB, Paiva AL, Redding CA, Fried TR. Characteristics of Older Adults Who Cannot Identify a Healthcare Agent. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(5):1313-1314. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06798-2. Epub 2021 Apr 26. No abstract available.
Ouellet GM, Fried TR, Gilstrap LG, O'Leary JR, Austin AM, Skinner JS, Cohen AB. Anticoagulant Use for Atrial Fibrillation Among Persons With Advanced Dementia at the End of Life. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1121-1123. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.1819.
Vaughan EM, Johnson E, Naik AD, Amspoker AB, Balasubramanyam A, Virani SS, Ballantyne CM, Johnston CA, Foreyt JP. Long-Term Effectiveness of the TIME Intervention to Improve Diabetes Outcomes in Low-Income Settings: a 2-Year Follow-Up. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Sep;37(12):3062-3069. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07363-7. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
Naik AD, Walling AM. Getting patients ready for "in the moment" decisions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2474-2477. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17935. Epub 2022 Jul 4. No abstract available.
Lee YK, Fried TR, Costello DM, Hajduk AM, O'Leary JR, Cohen AB. Perceived dementia risk and advance care planning among older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1481-1486. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17721. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
Zang E, Shi Y, Wang X, Wu B, Fried TR. Trajectories of physical functioning among US adults with cognitive impairment. Age Ageing. 2022 Jun 1;51(6):afac139. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac139.
Fried TR. Giving up on the objective of providing goal-concordant care: Advance care planning for improving caregiver outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Oct;70(10):3006-3011. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18000. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
Amenta E, Grigoryan L, Rajan SS, Ramsey D, Kramer JR, Walder A, Chou A, Van JN, Krein SL, Hysong S, Naik AD, Trautner BW. Quantifying the Implementation and Cost of a Multisite Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2023 Jun 30;3(1):e115. doi: 10.1017/ash.2023.198. eCollection 2023.
Dindo L, Chaison A, Rodrigues M, Woods K, Mark A, Boykin D. Feasibility of delivering a virtual 1-day acceptance and commitment therapy workshop to rural veterans through community partnerships. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Jun 20;34:101178. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101178. eCollection 2023 Aug.
Chary AN, Brickhouse E, Torres B, Santangelo I, Carpenter CR, Liu SW, Godwin KM, Naik AD, Singh H, Kennedy M. Leveraging the Electronic Health Record to Implement Emergency Department Delirium Screening. Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):478-486. doi: 10.1055/a-2073-3736. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
Chary A, Brickhouse E, Torres B, Cameron-Comasco L, Lee S, Punches B, Skains RM, Naik AD, Quatman-Yates CC, Kennedy M, Southerland LT, Liu S. Physical therapy consultation in the emergency department for older adults with falls: A qualitative study. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Apr 19;4(2):e12941. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12941. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Freytag J, Mishra RK, Street RL Jr, Catic A, Dindo L, Kiefer L, Najafi B, Naik AD. Using Wearable Sensors to Measure Goal Achievement in Older Veterans with Dementia. Sensors (Basel). 2022 Dec 16;22(24):9923. doi: 10.3390/s22249923.
Razjouyan J, Horstman MJ, Orkaby AR, Virani SS, Intrator O, Goyal P, Amos CI, Naik AD. Developing a Parsimonious Frailty Index for Older, Multimorbid Adults With Heart Failure Using Machine Learning. Am J Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;190:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.11.044. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
Crespo-Ramos G, Bebu I, Krause-Steinrauf H, Hoogendoorn CJ, Fang R, Ehrmann D, Presley C, Naik AD, Katona A, Walker EA, Cherrington A, Gonzalez JS; GRADE Research Group. Emotional distress and cardiovascular disease risk among participants enrolled in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Sep;203:110808. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2023.110808. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
Ritchey KC, Solberg LM, Citty SW, Kiefer L, Martinez E, Gray C, Naik AD. Guiding Post-Hospital Recovery by 'What Matters:' Implementation of Patient Priorities Identification in a VA Community Living Center. Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 Jul 4;8(4):74. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8040074.
Chary AN, Torres B, Brickhouse E, Santangelo I, Godwin KM, Naik AD, Carpenter CR, Liu SW, Kennedy M. Language discordance in emergency department delirium screening: Results from a qualitative interview-based study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Apr;71(4):1328-1331. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18147. Epub 2022 Nov 30. No abstract available.
Chary AN, Naik AD, Kennedy M. Reply to: Expanding options to include language barriers for predicting postoperative delirium in geriatric patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Jan;71(1):294-295. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18083. Epub 2022 Oct 17. No abstract available.
Naik AD. Measuring patient-centered care to improve hospital experiences of older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Dec;70(12):3348-3351. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18048. Epub 2022 Sep 20. No abstract available.
Scholle SH, Naik AD. A Person-Centered Care Dashboard for Individuals With Complex Health Care Needs-Charting a Course for the Future. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2224945. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.24945. No abstract available.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1 I01 HX003211-01A1
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CIN 13-413
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IIR 20-079
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id